Forthcoming events in this series


Tue, 31 Jan 2012

14:30 - 15:30
L3

The early evolution of Achlioptas processes

Lutz Warnke
Abstract

In Achlioptas processes, starting from an empty graph, in each step two potential edges are chosen uniformly at random, and using some rule one of them is selected and added to the evolving graph. Although the evolution of such `local' modifications of the Erdös-Rényi random graph processes has received considerable attention during the last decade, so far only rather `simple' rules are well-understood. Indeed, the main focus has been on bounded size rules (where all component sizes larger than some constant B are treated the same way), and for more complex rules hardly any rigorous results are known. In this talk we will discuss a new approach that applies to many involved Achlioptas processes: it allows us to prove that certain key statistics are tightly concentrated during the early evolution of e.g. the sum and product rule.

Joint work with Oliver Riordan.

Tue, 24 Jan 2012

14:30 - 15:30
L3

The phase transition in random graph processes through the lens of PDE and singularity analysis

Mihyun Kang (TU Graz)
Abstract

The phase transition deals with sudden global changes and is observed in many fundamental random discrete structures arising from statistical physics, mathematics and theoretical computer science, for example, Potts models, random graphs and random $k$-SAT. The phase transition in random graphs refers to the phenomenon that there is a critical edge density, to which adding a small amount results in a drastic change of the size and structure of the largest component. In the Erdős--R\'enyi random graph process, which begins with an empty graph on $n$ vertices and edges are added randomly one at a time to a graph, a phase transition takes place when the number of edges reaches $n/2$ and a giant component emerges. Since this seminal work of Erdős and R\'enyi, various random graph processes have been introduced and studied. In this talk we will discuss new approaches to study the size and structure of components near the critical point of random graph processes: key techniques are the classical ordinary differential equations method, a quasi-linear partial differential equation that tracks key statistics of the process, and singularity analysis.

Tue, 22 Nov 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Structure and the Fourier transform

Tom Sanders
(Oxford)
Abstract

We shall discuss how the algebra norm can be used to identify structure in groups. No prior familiarity with the area will be assumed.

Tue, 15 Nov 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Independent sets in hypergraphs

Wojciech Samotij
(Cambridge)
Abstract

We say that a hypergraph is \emph{stable} if each sufficiently large subset of its vertices either spans many hyperedges or is very structured. Hypergraphs that arise naturally in many classical settings posses the above property. For example, the famous stability theorem of Erdos and Simonovits and the triangle removal lemma of Ruzsa and Szemeredi imply that the hypergraph on the vertex set $E(K_n)$ whose hyperedges are the edge sets of all triangles in $K_n$ is stable. In the talk, we will present the following general theorem: If $(H_n)_n$ is a sequence of stable hypergraphs satisfying certain technical conditions, then a typical (i.e., uniform random) $m$-element independent set of $H_n$ is very structured, provided that $m$ is sufficiently large. The above abstract theorem has many interesting corollaries, some of which we will discuss. Among other things, it implies sharp bounds on the number of sum-free sets in a large class of finite Abelian groups and gives an alternate proof of Szemeredi’s theorem on arithmetic progressions in random subsets of integers.

Joint work with Noga Alon, Jozsef Balogh, and Robert Morris.

Tue, 08 Nov 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Embedding trees in sparse graphs

Diana Piguet
(Birmingham)
Abstract

An embedding of a graph H in a graph G is an injective mapping of the vertices of H to the vertices of G such that edges of H are mapped to edges of G. Embedding problems have been extensively studied. A very powerful tool in this area is Szemeredi's Regularity Temma. It approximates the host graph G by a quasirandom graph which inherits many of the properties of G. Unfortunately the direct use of Szemeredi's Regularity Lemma is useless if the host graph G is sparse.

During the talk I shall expose a technique to deal with embedding trees in sparse graphs. This technique has been developed by Ajtai, Komlos,Simonovits and Szemeredi to solve the Erdos-Sos conjecture. Presently the author together with Hladky, Komlos, Simonovits, Stein and Szemeredi apply this method to solve the related conjecture of Loebl, Komlos and Sos (approximate version).

Tue, 25 Oct 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

The board game Hex – history, results, problems

Bjarne Toft
(University of Southern Denmark)
Abstract

Hex was discovered independently by Piet Hein in Copenhagen in 1942 and byJohn Nash in Princeton in 1948.  The game is interesting because its rules are very simple, yet it is not known how to play best possible.  For example, a winning first move for the first player (who does have  a winning strategy) is still unknown. The talk will tell the history of the game and give simple proofs for basic results about it. Also the reverse game of HEX,sometimes called REX, will be discussed. New results about REX are under publication in Discrete Mathematics in a paper:  How to play Reverse Hex (joint work with Ryan Hayward and Phillip Henderson).

Tue, 18 Oct 2011

16:00 - 17:00
L1

LMS Aitken Lecture: "Matroid Representation over Infinite Fields"

Professor Geoff Whittle
(Victoria University of Wellington)
Abstract

 

A canonical way to obtain a matroid is from a finite set of vectors in a vector space over a field F. A matroid that can be obtained in such a way is said to be representable over F. It is clear that when Whitney first defined matroids he had matroids representable over the reals as his standard model, but for a variety of reasons most attention has focussed on matroids representable over finite fields.
There is increasing evidence that the class of matroids representable over a fixed finite field is well behaved with strong general theorems holding. Essentially none of these theorems hold if F is infnite. Indeed matroids representable over the real-- the natural matroids for our geometric intuition -- turn out to be a mysterious class indeed. In the talk I will discuss this striking contrast in behaviour.

 

Tue, 18 Oct 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

LMS Aitken Lecture: "Well-quasi-ordering Binary Matroids"

Professor Geoff Whittle
(Victoria University of Wellington)
Abstract

The Graph Minors Project of Robertson and Seymour is one of the highlights of twentieth-century mathematics. In a long series of mostly difficult papers they prove theorems that give profound insight into the qualitative structure of members of proper minor-closed classes of graphs. This insight enables them to prove some remarkable banner theorems, one of which is that in any infinite set of graphs there is one that is a minor of the other; in other words, graphs are well-quasi-ordered under the minor order.
A canonical way to obtain a matroid is from a set of columns of a matrix over a field. If each column has at most two nonzero entries there is an obvious graph associated with the matroid; thus it is not hard to see that matroids generalise graphs. Robertson and Seymour always believed that their results were special cases of more general theorems for matroids obtained from matrices over nite elds. For over a decade, Jim Geelen, Bert Gerards and I have been working towards achieving this generalisation. In this talk I will discuss our success in achieving the generalisation for binary matroids, that is, for matroids that can be obtained from matrices over the 2-element field.
In this talk I will give a very general overview of my work with Geelen and Gerards. I will not assume familiarity with matroids nor will I assume familiarity with the results of the Graph Minors Project
Tue, 11 Oct 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Induced graph removal

David Conlon
(Oxford)
Abstract

The induced graph removal lemma states that for any fixed graph $H$ on $h$ vertices and any $e\textgreater 0$ there exists $d\textgreater0$ such that any graph $G$ with at most $d n^h$ induced copies of $H$ may be made $H$-free by adding or removing atmost $e n^2$ edges. This fact was originally proven by Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich and Szegedy. In this talk, we discuss a new proof and itsrelation to various regularity lemmas. This is joint work with Jacob Fox.

Tue, 14 Jun 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Ramsey Classes of Graphs and Beyond

Jaroslav Nesetril
(Prague)
Abstract

It is known that generic and universal structures and Ramsey classes are related. We explain this connection and complement it by some new examples. Particularly we disscuss universal and Ramsey classes defined by existence and non-existence of homomorphisms.

Tue, 07 Jun 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Average-case performance of three-dimensional assignment heuristics

Gregory Sorkin
(LSE)
Abstract

The 2-dimensional assignment problem (minimum cost matching) is solvable in polynomial time, and it is known that a random instance of size n, with entries chosen independently and uniformly at random from [0,1], has expected cost tending to π^2/6.  In dimensions 3 and higher, the "planar" assignment problem is NP-complete, but what is the expected cost for a random instance, and how well can a heuristic do?  In d dimensions, the expected cost is of order at least n^{2-d} and at most ln n times larger, but the upper bound is non-constructive.  For 3 dimensions, we show a heuristic capable of producing a solution within a factor n^ε of the lower bound, for any constant ε, in time of order roughly n^{1/ε}.  In dimensions 4 and higher, the question is wide open: we don't know any reasonable average-case assignment heuristic.

Tue, 31 May 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Component structure of the vacant set induced by a random walk on a random graph

Colin Cooper
(King's College London)
Abstract

We consider random walks on two classes of random graphs and explore the likely structure of the the set of unvisited vertices or vacant set. In both cases, the size of the vacant set $N(t)$ can be obtained explicitly as a function of $t$. Let $\Gamma(t)$ be the subgraph induced by the vacant set. We show that, for random graphs $G_{n,p}$ above the connectivity threshold, and for random regular graphs $G_r$, for constant $r\geq 3$, there is a phase transition in the sense of the well-known Erdos-Renyi phase transition. Thus for $t\leq (1-\epsilon)t^*$ we have a unique giant plus components of  size $O(\log n)$ and for $t\geq (1+\epsilon)t^*$ we have only components of  size $O(\log n)$.

In the case of $G_r$ we describe the likely degree sequence, size of the giant component and structure of the small ($O(\log n)$) size components.

Tue, 24 May 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

The degree distribution of random planar graphs

Angelika Steger
(ETH Zurich)
Abstract

A random planar graph $P_n$ is a graph drawn uniformly at random from the class of all (labelled) planar graphs on $n$ vertices. In this talk we show that with probability $1-o(1)$ the number of vertices of degree $k$ in $P_n$ is very close to a quantity $d_k n$ that we determine explicitly. Here $k=k(n) \le c \log n$. In the talk our main emphasis will be on the techniques for proving such results. (Joint work with Kosta Panagiotou.)

Tue, 10 May 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Edge colouring multigraphs

Penny Haxell
(Waterloo)
Abstract

We highlight a technique for studying edge colourings of multigraphs, due to Tashkinov. This method is a sophisticated generalisation of the method of alternating paths, and builds upon earlier work by Kierstead and Goldberg. In particular we show how to apply it to a number of edge colouring problems, including the question of whether the class of multigraphs that attain equality in Vizing's classical bound can be characterised.

This talk represents joint work with Jessica McDonald.

Tue, 03 May 2011

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Hajos’ Conjecture is almost always true

Bruce Reed
(McGill)
Abstract

In 1961 Hajos conjectured that if a graph contains no subdivsion of a clique of order t then its chromatic number is less than t. In 1981, Erdos and Fajtlowicz showed that the conjecture is almost always false. We show it is almost always true. This is joint work with Keevash, Mohar, and McDiarmid.

Tue, 08 Mar 2011
14:30
L3

"Random matroids"

Dominic Welsh
(Oxford)
Abstract

I shall describe some recent results about the asymptotic behaviour of matroids.

Specifically almost all matroids are simple and have probability at least 1/2 of being connected.

Also, various quantitative results about rank, number of bases and number and size of circuits of almost all matroids are given. There are many open problems and I shall not assume any previous knowledge of matroids. This is joint work, see below.

1 D. Mayhew, M. Newman, D. Welsh and G. Whittle,

On the asymptotic properties of connected matroids, European J. Combin. to appear

2 J. Oxley, C. Semple, L. Wasrshauer and D. Welsh,

On properties of almost all matroids, (2011) submitted

Tue, 08 Feb 2011
16:30
SR2

"The C_ell -free process".

Lutz Warnke
Abstract

The $C_\ell$-free process starts with the empty graph on $n$ vertices and adds edges chosen uniformly at random, one at a time, subject to the condition that no copy of $C_\ell$ is created. For every $\ell \geq 4$ we show that, with high probability as $n \to \infty$, the maximum degree is $O((n \log n)^{1/(\ell-1)})$, which confirms a conjecture of Bohman and Keevash and improves on bounds of Osthus and Taraz. Combined with previous results this implies that the $C_\ell$-free process typically terminates with $\Theta(n^{\ell/(\ell-1)}(\log n)^{1/(\ell-1)})$ edges, which answers a question of Erd\H{o}s, Suen and Winkler. This is the first result that determines the final number of edges of the more general $H$-free process for a non-trivial \emph{class} of graphs $H$. We also verify a conjecture of Osthus and Taraz concerning the average degree, and obtain a new lower bound on the independence number. Our proof combines the differential equation method with a tool that might be of independent interest: we establish a rigorous way to `transfer' certain decreasing properties from the binomial random graph to the $H$-free process.

Tue, 16 Nov 2010

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Triangles in tripartite graphs

John Talbot
(UCL)
Abstract

How many triangles must a graph of density d contain? This old question due to Erdos was recently answered by Razborov, after many decades of progress by numerous authors.

We will consider the analogous question for tripartite graphs. Given a tripartite graph with prescribed edges densities between each

pair of classes how many triangles must it contain?

Tue, 09 Nov 2010

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Intersecting families of graphs

David Ellis
(Cambridge)
Abstract

A family of graphs F on a fixed set of n vertices is said to be triangle-intersecting if for any two graphs G,H in F, the intersection of G and H contains a triangle. Simonovits and Sos conjectured that such a family has size at most (1/8)2^{\binom{n}{2}}, and that equality holds only if F
consists of all graphs containing some fixed triangle. Recently, the author, Yuval Filmus and Ehud Friedgut proved a strengthening of this conjecture, namely that if F is an odd-cycle-intersecting family of graphs, then |F| \leq (1/8) 2^{\binom{n}{2}}. Equality holds only if F consists of all graphs containing some fixed triangle. A stability result also holds: an odd-cycle-intersecting family with size close to the maximum must be close to a family of the above form. We will outline proofs of these results, which use Fourier analysis, together with an analysis of the properties of random cuts in graphs, and some results in the theory of Boolean functions. We will then discuss some related open questions.

All will be based on joint work with Yuval Filmus (University of Toronto) and Ehud Friedgut (Hebrew University of Jerusalem).

Tue, 26 Oct 2010

14:30 - 15:30
L3

When not knowing can slow you down

Raphael Clifford
(Bristol)
Abstract

Combinatorial pattern matching is a subject which has given us fast and elegant algorithms for a number of practical real world problems as well as being of great theoretical interest. However, when single character wildcards or so-called "don't know" symbols are introduced into the input, classic methods break down and it becomes much more challenging to find provably fast solutions. This talk will give a brief overview of recent results in the area of pattern matching with don't knows and show how techniques from fields as disperse FFTs, group testing and algebraic coding theory have been required to make any progress. We will, if time permits, also discuss the main open problems in the area.

Tue, 19 Oct 2010

14:30 - 15:30
L3

Sorting under Partial Information and Partial Order Entropy

Jean Cardinal
(Universite Libre de Bruxelles)
Abstract

We revisit the problem of sorting under partial information: sort a finite set given the outcomes of comparisons between some pairs of elements. The input is a partially ordered set P, and solving the problem amounts to discovering an unknown linear extension of P, using pairwise comparisons. The information-theoretic lower bound on the number of comparisons needed in the worst case is log e(P), the binary logarithm of the number of linear extensions of P. In a breakthrough paper, Jeff Kahn and Jeong Han Kim (STOC 1992) showed that there exists a polynomial-time sorting algorithm achieving this bound up to a constant factor. They established a crucial link between the entropy of the input partial order and the information-theoretic lower bound. However, their algorithm invokes the ellipsoid algorithm at each iteration for determining the next comparison, making it unpractical. We develop efficient algorithms for sorting under partial information, derived from approximation and exact algorithms for computing the partial order entropy.

This is joint work with S. Fiorini, G. Joret, R. Jungers, and I. Munro.

Tue, 12 Oct 2010

14:30 - 15:30
L3

A couple of easy cases for counting Euler tours

Mary Cryan
(Edinburgh)
Abstract

The problem of checking existence for an Euler tour of a graph is trivial (are all vertex degrees even?). The problem of counting (or even approximate counting) Euler tours seems to be very difficult. I will describe two simple classes of graphs where the problem can be

solved exactly in polynomial time. And also talk about the many many classes of graphs where no positive results are known.