Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar
|
Tue, 27/04/2010 15:45 |
Jonny Evans (Cambridge) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
| Lagrangian submanifolds are an important class of objects in symplectic geometry. They arise in diverse settings: as vanishing cycles in complex algebraic geometry, as invariant sets in integrable systems, as Heegaard tori in Heegaard-Floer theory and of course as "branes" in the A-model of mirror symmetry. We ask the difficult question: when are two Lagrangian submanifolds isotopic? Restricting to the simplest case of Lagrangian spheres in rational surfaces we will give examples where this question has a complete answer. We will also give some very pictorial examples (due to Seidel) illustrating how two Lagrangians can fail to be isotopic. | |||
|
Tue, 04/05/2010 14:00 |
Maxim Kontsevich (IHES) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L2 |
|
Tue, 04/05/2010 15:45 |
Maxim Kontsevich (IHES) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
|
Tue, 11/05/2010 15:45 |
Tobias Ekholm (Uppsala) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
We show how to compute the symplectic homology of a 4-dimensional Weinstein manifold from a diagram of the Legendrian link which is the attaching locus of its 2-handles. The computation uses a combination of a generalization of Chekanov's description of the Legendrian homology of links in standard contact 3-space, where the ambient contact manifold is replaced by a connected sum of 's, and recent results on the behaviour of holomorphic curve invariants under Legendrian surgery. |
|||
|
Tue, 18/05/2010 14:00 |
Emanuele Macri (Utah) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
SR1 |
We report on joint work with Arend Bayer on the space of stability conditions for the canonical bundle on the projective plane.
We will describe a connected component of this space, generalizing and completing a previous construction of Bridgeland.
In particular, we will see how this space is related to classical results of Drezet-Le Potier on stable vector bundles on the projective plane. Using this, we can determine the group of autoequivalences of the derived category. As a consequence, we can identify a -action on the space of stability conditions, which will give a global picture of mirror symmetry for this example.
In the second hour we will give some details on the proof of the main theorem. |
|||
|
Tue, 18/05/2010 15:45 |
Emanuele Macri (Utah) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
We report on joint work with Arend Bayer on the space of stability conditions for the canonical bundle on the projective plane.
We will describe a connected component of this space, generalizing and completing a previous construction of Bridgeland.
In particular, we will see how this space is related to classical results of Drezet-Le Potier on stable vector bundles on the projective plane. Using this, we can determine the group of autoequivalences of the derived category. As a consequence, we can identify a -action on the space of stability conditions, which will give a global picture of mirror symmetry for this example.
In the second hour we will give some details on the proof of the main theorem. |
|||
|
Tue, 01/06/2010 14:00 |
Denis-Charles Cisinski (Paris 13) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L2 |
Starting from Morel and Voevodsky's stable homotopy theory of schemes, one defines, for each noetherian scheme of finite dimension , the triangulated category of motives over (with rational coefficients). These categories satisfy all the the expected functorialities (Grothendieck's six operations), from
which one deduces that also satisfies cohomological proper
descent. Together with Gabber's weak local uniformisation theorem,
this allows to prove other expected properties (e.g. finiteness
theorems, duality theorems), at least for motivic sheaves over
excellent schemes. |
|||
|
Tue, 01/06/2010 15:45 |
Denis-Charles Cisinski (Paris 13) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
A categorification of cycle class maps consists to define
realization functors from constructible motivic sheaves to other
categories of coefficients (e.g. constructible -adic sheaves), which are compatible with the six operations. Given a field , we
will describe a systematic construction, which associates,
to any cohomology theory , represented in , a
triangulated category of constructible -modules , for
of finite type over , endowed with a realization functor from
the triangulated category of constructible motivic sheaves over .
In the case is either algebraic de Rham cohomology (with ), or is -adic cohomology, one recovers in this way the triangulated categories of -modules or of -adic sheaves. In the case is rigid cohomology (with ), this construction provides a nice system of -adic coefficients which is closed under the six operations. |
|||
|
Tue, 08/06/2010 15:45 |
David Stern (Maseno University) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |

's, and recent results on the behaviour of holomorphic curve invariants under Legendrian surgery.
-action I'
, the triangulated category
of motives over
also satisfies cohomological proper
descent. Together with Gabber's weak local uniformisation theorem,
this allows to prove other expected properties (e.g. finiteness
theorems, duality theorems), at least for motivic sheaves over
excellent schemes.
-adic sheaves), which are compatible with the six operations. Given a field
, we
will describe a systematic construction, which associates,
to any cohomology theory
, represented in
, a
triangulated category of constructible
, for
), or
-modules or of
), this construction provides a nice system of
-adic coefficients which is closed under the six operations.