Logic Seminar
|
Thu, 20/01/2011 17:00 |
Tobias Kaiser (Passau) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 20/01/2011 17:00 |
Professor Tobias Kaiser |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
We are interested in measure theory and integration theory that ¯ts into the |
|||
|
Thu, 27/01/2011 17:00 |
Arno Fehm (Konstanz) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 27/01/2011 17:00 |
Arno Fehm (Konstanz) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
I will present a decidability result for theories of large fields of algebraic numbers, for example certain subfields of the field of totally real algebraic numbers. This result has as special cases classical theorems of Jarden-Kiehne, Fried-Haran-Völklein, and Ershov. The theories in question are axiomatized by Galois theoretic properties and geometric local-global principles, and I will point out the connections with the seminal work of Ax on the theory of finite fields. |
|||
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 17:00 |
Francoise Delon (Paris 7) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
A -relation is the ternary relation induced by an ultrametric distance, in particular a valuation on a field, when we only remember the relation:
iff .
A -structure is a set equipped with a -relation and possibly additional structure.
Following Haskell, Macpherson and Steinhorn, such a structure is said to be -minimal if, in any structure elementarily equivalent to , definable
sets in one-space (in one variable) are Boolean combinations of “cones” or “thick cones” (the generalization of “open” and “closed” balls from ultrametric spaces).
A -field is a field equipped with a -relation compatible with addition and multiplication.
It is known that a -minimal field is valued algebraically closed with induced by the valuation.
There are obvious analogies between o-minimality and -minimality...
and obvious differences!
We investigate more precisely the case of fields. |
|||
|
Thu, 10/02/2011 17:00 |
Philip Welch (Bristol) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 10/02/2011 17:00 |
Philip Welch (Bristol) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Games are ubiquitous in set theory and in particular can be used to build models (often using some large cardinal property to justify the existence of strategies). As a reversal one can define large cardinal properties in terms of such games. We look at some such that build models through indiscernibles, and that have recently had some effect on structures at aleph_2. |
|||
|
Thu, 17/02/2011 16:00 |
Jan Denef (Leuven) |
Logic Seminar Number Theory Seminar |
|
|
We will sketch a new proof of the Theorem of Ax and Kochen that any projective hypersurface over the p-adic numbers has a p-adic rational point, if it is given by a homogeneous polynomial with more variables than the square of its degree d, assuming that p is large enough with respect to the degree d. Our proof is purely algebraic geometric and (unlike all previous ones) does not use methods from mathematical logic. It is based on a (small upgrade of a) theorem of Abramovich and Karu about weak toroidalization of morphisms. Our method also yields a new alternative approach to the model theory of henselian valued fields (including the Ax-Kochen-Ersov transfer principle and quantifier elimination). |
|||
|
Thu, 17/02/2011 16:00 |
Jan Denef (Leuven) |
Logic Seminar Number Theory Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 24/02/2011 17:00 |
Jean-Philippe Rolin (Dijon) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
It is known that the expansion of the real field by some quasianalytic algebras of functions are o-minimal and polynomially bounded. We prove that, for these structures, the preparation theorem for definable functions proved by L. van den Dries and P. Speissegger has an explicit form, from which it is easy to deduce a quantifier elimination result. |
|||
|
Thu, 03/03/2011 17:00 |
Andreas Baudisch (HU Berlin) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 10/03/2011 17:00 |
Jonathan Kirby (University of East Anglia) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
|
Zilber constructed an exponential field B, which is conjecturally isomorphic to the complex exponential field. He did so by giving axioms in an infinitary logic, and showing there is exactly one model of those axioms. Following a suggestion of Zilber, I will give a different list of axioms satisfied by B which, under a number-theoretic conjecture known as CIT, describe its complete first-order theory |
|||
|
Thu, 10/03/2011 17:00 |
Jonathan Kirby (Norwich) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |

-relation is the ternary relation induced by an ultrametric distance, in particular a valuation on a field, when we only remember the relation:
iff
.
A
is said to be
elementarily equivalent to