Forthcoming Seminars
|
Tue, 01/02/2011 11:00 |
Hannah Arnold (AOPP (Oxford University)) |
Applied Dynamical Systems and Inverse Problems Seminar |
DH 3rd floor SR |
| This will be a discussion on Stochastic Parameterisation, led by Hannah. | |||
|
Tue, 01/02/2011 12:00 |
Roberto Percacci (SISSA) |
Quantum Field Theory Seminar |
L3 |
| I define what it means for a quantum field theory to be asymptotically safe and discuss possible applications to theories of gravity and matter. | |||
|
Tue, 01/02/2011 14:15 |
Prof. Paul Linden (G I Taylor Professor of Fluid Mechanics (University of Cambridge)) |
Geophysical and Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics Seminar |
Dobson Room, AOPP |
|
Tue, 01/02/2011 15:45 |
Sergey Mozgovoy (Oxford) |
Algebraic and Symplectic Geometry Seminar |
L3 |
|
Tue, 01/02/2011 17:00 |
Dr David Stewart (Oxford) |
Algebra Seminar |
L2 |
|
Wed, 02/02/2011 11:30 |
Nicholas Cooney (University of Oxford) |
Algebra Kinderseminar |
ChCh, Tom Gate, Room 2 |
| I will give an introduction to Kashiwara's theory of crystal bases. Crystals are combinatorial objects associated to integrable modules for quantum groups that, together with the related notion of crystal bases, capture several combinatorial aspects of their representation theory. | |||
|
Wed, 02/02/2011 16:00 |
Nicholas Touikan (Oxford University) |
Junior Geometric Group Theory Seminar |
SR2 |
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 11:00 |
Austin Yim (Oxford) |
Advanced Logic Class |
SR2 |
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 13:00 |
Raphael Hauser |
Mathematical Finance Internal Seminar |
DH 1st floor SR |
| Optimisation problems involving objective functions defined on function spaces often have a natural interpretation as a variational problem, leading to a solution approach via calculus of variations. An equally natural alternative approach is to approximate the function space by a finite-dimensional subspace and use standard nonlinear optimisation techniques. The second approach is often easier to use, as the occurrence of absolute value terms and inequality constraints poses no technical problem, while the calculus of variations approach becomes very involved. We argue our case by example of two applications in mathematical finance: the computation of optimal execution rates, and pre-computed trade volume curves for high frequency trading. | |||
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 13:00 |
Victoria Hoskins (University of Oxford) |
Junior Geometry and Topology Seminar |
SR1 |
| Consider the action of a complex reductive group on a complex projective variety X embedded in projective space. Geometric Invariant Theory allows us to construct a 'categorical' quotient of an open subset of X, called the semistable set. If in addition X is smooth then it is a symplectic manifold and in nice cases we can construct a moment map for the action and the Marsden-Weinstein reduction gives a symplectic quotient of the group action on an open subset of X. We will discuss both of these constructions and the relationship between the GIT quotient and the Marsden-Weinstein reduction. The quotients we have discussed provide a quotient for only an open subset of X and so we then go on to discuss how we can construct quotients of certain subvarieties contained in the complement of the semistable locus. | |||
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 14:00 |
Prof Des Higham (University of Strathclyde) |
Computational Mathematics and Applications |
Gibson Grd floor SR |
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 14:30 |
Stephen Donkin (York) |
Representation Theory Seminar |
L3 |
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 16:00 |
Jacob Tsimerman (Princeton University) |
Number Theory Seminar |
L3 |
We discuss the following question of Nick Katz and Frans Oort: Given an
Algebraically closed field K , is there an Abelian variety over K of
dimension g which is not isogenous to a Jacobian? For K the complex
numbers
its easy to see that the answer is yes for g>3 using measure theory, but
over a countable field like new methods are required. Building on
work
of Chai-Oort, we show that, as expected, such Abelian varieties exist for
and g>3 . We will explain the proof as well as its connection to
the
Andre Oort conjecture. |
|||
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 16:00 |
OCIAM Members coffee DH common Room |
Differential Equations and Applications Seminar |
DH Common Room |
|
Thu, 03/02/2011 17:00 |
Francoise Delon (Paris 7) |
Logic Seminar |
L3 |
A -relation is the ternary relation induced by an ultrametric distance, in particular a valuation on a field, when we only remember the relation:
iff .
A -structure is a set equipped with a -relation and possibly additional structure.
Following Haskell, Macpherson and Steinhorn, such a structure is said to be -minimal if, in any structure elementarily equivalent to , definable
sets in one-space (in one variable) are Boolean combinations of “cones” or “thick cones” (the generalization of “open” and “closed” balls from ultrametric spaces).
A -field is a field equipped with a -relation compatible with addition and multiplication.
It is known that a -minimal field is valued algebraically closed with induced by the valuation.
There are obvious analogies between o-minimality and -minimality...
and obvious differences!
We investigate more precisely the case of fields. |
|||
|
Fri, 04/02/2011 14:00 |
Dr Edward Codling (University of Essex) |
Mathematical Biology and Ecology Seminar |
L1 |
| Mathematical modelling of the movement of animals, micro-organisms and cells is of great relevance in the fields of biology, ecology and medicine. Movement models can take many different forms, but the most widely used are based on extensions of simple random walk processes. In this talk I will review some of the basic ideas behind the theory of random walks and diffusion processes and discuss how these models are used in the context of modelling animal movement. I will present several case studies, each of which is an extension or application of some of the simple random walk ideas discussed previously. Specifically, I will consider problems related to biased and correlated movements, path analysis of movement data, sampling and processing issues and the problem of determining movement processes from observed patterns. I will also discuss some biological examples of how these models can be used, including chemosensory movements and interactions between zooplankton and the movements of fish. | |||
|
Fri, 04/02/2011 14:15 |
Dr Anke Wiese (Heriot-Watt University) |
Nomura Seminar |
DH 1st floor SR |
| In the Heston stochastic volatility model, the variance process is given by a mean-reverting square-root process. It is known that its transition probability density can be represented by a non-central chi-square density. There are fundamental differences in the behaviour of the variance process depending on the number of degrees of freedom: if the number of degrees of freedom is larger or equal to 2, the zero boundary is unattainable; if it is smaller than 2, the zero boundary is attracting and attainable. We focus on the attainable zero boundary case and in particular the case when the number of degrees of freedom is smaller than 1, typical in foreign exchange markets. We prove a new representation for the density based on powers of generalized Gaussian random variables. Further we prove that Marsaglia's polar method extends to the generalized Gaussian distribution, providing an exact and efficient method for generalized Gaussian sampling. Thus, we establish a new exact and efficient method for simulating the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross process for an attracting and attainable zero boundary, and thus establish a new simple method for simulating the Heston model. We demonstrate our method in the computation of option prices for parameter cases that are described in the literature as challenging and practically relevant. | |||
|
Mon, 07/02/2011 12:00 |
Fay Dowker (Imperial College) |
String Theory Seminar |
L3 |
| Abstract: In the continuum the answer to the title question is "no". But if spacetime is atomic then the answer is yes. And it so happens that there is rather compelling circumstantial evidence that spacetime is actually discrete at the Planck scale. So now the question becomes, why if spacetime is discrete should it take the form of a discrete causal structure or *order*? The answer is that if you don't put causal order in fundamentally you don't get it out – at least that's what known models of "emergent spacetime" indicate. If we want to make life easy for ourselves in quantum gravity, then, we should plump for discrete causal order (a "causal set") as the inner basis for spacetime. That, however raises the spectre of wild nonlocality. I will describe recent progress that shows that this wildness can be tamed. In particular we now have an approximately local action for causal sets and I'll explain what that means. | |||
|
Mon, 07/02/2011 14:15 |
Jochen Heinloth (Amsterdam) |
Geometry and Analysis Seminar |
L3 |
|
Mon, 07/02/2011 14:15 |
Keith Ball |
Stochastic Analysis Seminar |
Eagle House |
|
The talk will explain how a geometric principle gave rise to a new variational description of information-theoretic entropy and how this led to the solution of a problem dating back to the 50's: whether the the central limit theorem is driven by an analogue of the second law of thermodynamics. |
|||

Not Isogenous to a Jacobian
and g>3 . We will explain the proof as well as its connection to
the
Andre Oort conjecture.
-relation is the ternary relation induced by an ultrametric distance, in particular a valuation on a field, when we only remember the relation:
iff
.
A
is said to be
elementarily equivalent to