Decomposition of graphs and $\chi$-boundedness
|
Tue, 02/03/2010 14:30 |
Nicolas Trotignon (Paris) |
Combinatorial Theory Seminar |
L3 |
A graph is -bounded with a function is for all induced subgraph H of G, we have . Here, denotes the chromatic number of , and the size of a largest clique in . We will survey several results saying that excluding various kinds of induced subgraphs implies -boundedness. More precisely, let be a set of graphs. If a is the class of all graphs that do not any induced subgraph isomorphic to a member of , is it true that there is a function that -bounds all graphs from ? For some lists , the answer is yes, for others, it is no.
A decomposition theorems is a theorem saying that all graphs from a given class are either "basic" (very simple), or can be partitioned into parts with interesting relationship. We will discuss whether proving decomposition theorems is an efficient method to prove -boundedness. |
|||

-boundedness
is for all induced subgraph H of G, we have
. Here,
denotes the chromatic number of
, and
the size of a largest clique in
be a set of graphs. If a
is the class of all graphs that do not any induced subgraph isomorphic to a member of