Part 2New SkillsFormulating MathsProof Site map |
Summary
Students often worry a great deal about this question, particularly in the early stages of their undergraduate careers. There is indeed some difficulty in judging what it is permissible to assume, but students are inclined to exaggerate the problem. There are two reasons for saying this. One is that tutors will be much less concerned about a solution in which everything is correct except that you have (knowingly) assumed something which you were really intended to prove than about a solution which contains fallacies or non-sequiturs. The second reason is that, in some of the courses in your first term or two, you will, for a while, be expected to prove things which you have either known for years (such as the existence of nth roots of positive numbers) or which are in some sense obvious (such as the fact that a continuous function which takes positive and negative values must also take the value zero somewhere). Simultaneously, you will be doing other (more applied) courses where these and other familiar or obvious facts are freely used without comment. This can be confusing, but the situation will not last very long. After a while, all courses will be proving facts which you did not know and which are not obvious. When you reach that stage, it should be clearer what you can assume and what you should prove. Nevertheless, it is possible to give some broad guidelines about this question, all of which are valid in some situations:
|
||||
| Design: Paul Gartside, Content: Prof. C. Batty, December 1999. |
|