Forthcoming events in this series


Wed, 14 Nov 2018
16:30
C1

Small polycyclic groups

David Hume
(Oxford University)
Abstract

Polycyclic groups either have polynomial growth, in which case they are virtually nilpotent, or exponential growth. I will give two interesting examples of "small" polycyclic groups which are extensions of $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the Heisenberg group by the integers, and attempt to justify the claim that they are small by sketching an argument that every exponential growth polycyclic group contains one of these.

Wed, 07 Nov 2018
16:00
C1

Boundaries of Hyperbolic Groups

Sam Colvin
(Bristol University)
Abstract

You’re an amateur investigator hired to uncover the mysterious goings on of a dark cult. They call themselves Geometric Group Theorists and they’re under suspicion of pushing humanity’s knowledge too far. You’ve tracked them down to their supposed headquarters. Foolishly, you enter. Your mind writhes as you gaze unwittingly upon the Eldritch horror they’ve summoned… Group Theory! You think fast; donning the foggy glasses of quasi-isometry, you prevent your mind shattering from the unfathomable complexity of The Beast. You spy a weak spot and the phrase `Gromov Hyperbolicity’ flashes across your mind. You peer deeper, further, forever… only to find yourself somewhere rather familiar, strange, but familiar… no, self-similar! You’ve fought with fractals before, this weirdness can be tamed! Your insight is sufficient and The Beast retreats for now.
In other words, given an infinite group, we associate to it an infinite graph, called a Cayley graph, which gives us a notion of the ‘geometry’ of a group. Through this we can ask what kind of groups have hyperbolic geometry, or at least an approximation of it called Gromov hyperbolicity. Hyperbolic groups are quite a nice class of groups but a large one, so we introduce the Gromov boundary of a hyperbolic group and explain how it can be used to distinguish groups in this class.

Wed, 31 Oct 2018
16:00
C1

An Introduction to Seifert Fibred Spaces

Joseph Scull
(Oxford University)
Abstract


A core problem in the study of manifolds and their topology is that of telling them apart. That is, when can we say whether or not two manifolds are homeomorphic? In two dimensions, the situation is simple, the Classification Theorem for Surfaces allows us to differentiate between any two closed surfaces. In three dimensions, the problem is a lot harder, as the century long search for a proof of the Poincaré Conjecture demonstrates, and is still an active area of study today.
As an early pioneer in the area of 3-manifolds Seifert carved out his own corner of the landscape instead of attempting to tackle the entire problem. By reducing his scope to the subclass of 3-manifolds which are today known as Seifert fibred spaces, Seifert was able to use our knowledge of 2-manifolds and produce a classification theorem of his own.
In this talk I will define Seifert fibred spaces, explain what makes them so much easier to understand than the rest of the pack, and give some insight on why we still care about them today.
 

Wed, 24 Oct 2018
16:00
C1

Finding fibres for free factors

Benjamin Brück
(Bielefeld University)
Abstract

"Fibre theorems" in the style of Quillen's fibre lemma are versatile tools used to study the topology of partially ordered sets. In this talk, I will formulate two of them and explain how these can be used to determine the homotopy type of the complex of (conjugacy classes of) free factors of a free group.
The latter is joint work with Radhika Gupta (see https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09380).

Wed, 17 Oct 2018
16:00
C1

Graph products of groups

Motiejus Valiunas
(Southampton University)
Abstract

Graph products are a class of groups that 'interpolate' between direct and free products, and generalise the notion of right-angled Artin groups. Given a property that free products (and maybe direct products) are known to satisfy, a natural question arises: do graph products satisfy this property? For instance, it is known that graph products act on tree-like spaces (quasi-trees) in a nice way (acylindrically), just like free products. In the talk we will discuss a construction of such an action and, if time permits, its relation to solving systems of equations over graph products.

Wed, 10 Oct 2018
16:00
C5

Cubulating Groups

Sam Shepherd
(Oxford University)
Abstract

Cubulating a group means finding a proper cocompact action on a CAT(0) cube complex. I will describe how cubulating a group tells us some nice properties of the group, and explain a general strategy for finding cubulations.

Wed, 13 Jun 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

The l1-homology of one-relator groups

Nicolaus Heuer
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will study the l1-homology of the 2-class in one relator groups. We will see that there are many qualitative and quantitive similarities between the l1-norm of the top dimensional class and the stable commutator length of the defining relation. As an application we construct manifolds with small simplicial volume.

This work in progress is joint with Clara Loeh.

Wed, 06 Jun 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

QI rigidity of commensurator subgroups

Alex Margolis
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

One of the main themes in geometric group theory is Gromov's program to classify finitely generated groups up to quasi-isometry. We show that under certain situations, a quasi-isometry preserves commensurator subgroups. We will focus on the case where a finitely generated group G contains a coarse PD_n subgroup H such that G=Comm(H). Such groups can be thought of as coarse fibrations whose fibres are cosets of H; quasi-isometries of G coarsely preserve these fibres. This  generalises work of Whyte and Mosher--Sageev--Whyte.

Wed, 30 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

The pants graph

Esmee te Winkel
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

In the 80s, Hatcher and Thurston introduced the pants graph as a tool to prove that the mapping class group of a closed, orientable surface is finitely presented. The pants graph remains relevant for the study of the mapping class group, sitting between the marking graph and the curve graph. More precisely, there is a sequence of natural coarse lipschitz maps taking the marking graph via the pants graph to the curve graph.

A second motivation for studying the pants graph comes from Teichmüller theory. Brock showed that the pants graph can be interpreted as a combinatorial model for Teichmüller space with the Weil-Petersson metric.

In this talk I will introduce the pants graph, discuss some of its properties and state a few open questions.

Wed, 23 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Growth in Virtually Abelian Groups

Alex Evetts
(Heriot-Watt University)
Abstract

Elements of a finitely generated group have a natural notion of length: namely the length of a shortest word over the generators that represents the element. This allows us to study the growth of such groups by considering the size of spheres with increasing radii. One current area of interest is the rationality or otherwise of the formal power series whose coefficients are the sphere sizes. I will describe a combinatorial way to study this series for the class of virtually abelian groups, introduced by Benson in the 1980s, and then outline its applications to other types of growth series.

Wed, 16 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Thompson's Group

Sam Shepherd
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Thompson's group F is a group of homeomorphisms of the unit interval which exhibits a strange mix of properties; on the one hand it has some self-similarity type properties one might expect of a really big group, but on the other hand it is finitely presented. I will give a proof of finite generation by expressing elements as pairs of binary trees.

Thu, 10 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Morse subsets of hierarchically hyperbolic spaces

Davide Spriano
(ETH Zurich)
Abstract

When dealing with geometric structures one natural question that arise is "when does a subset inherit the geometry of the ambient space"? In the case of hyperbolic space, the concept of quasi-convexity provides answer to this question. However, for a general metric space, being quasi-convex is not a quasi-isometric invariant. This motivates the notion of Morse subsets. In this talk we will motivate the definition and introduce some examples. Then we will introduce the class of hierarchically hyperbolic groups (HHG), and furnish a complete characterization of Morse subgroups of HHG. If time allows, we will discuss the relationship between Morse subgroups and hyperbolically-embedded subgroups. This is a joint work with Hung C. Tran and Jacob Russell.

Wed, 02 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Treating vertex transitive graphs like groups

Alexander Wendland
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

In 2012 Eskin, Fisher and Whyte proved there was a locally finite vertex transitive graph which was not quasi-isometric to any connected locally finite Cayley Graph. This motivates the study of vertex transitive graphs from a geometric group theory point of view. We will discus how concepts and problems from group theory generalise to this setting. Constructing one framework in which problems can be framed so that techniques from group theory can be applied. This is work in progress with Agelos Georgakopoulos.

Wed, 07 Mar 2018
16:00
C5

Least dilatation of pure surface braids

Marissa Loving
(University of Illinois)
Abstract

 The $n$-stranded pure surface braid group of a genus g surface can be described as the subgroup of the pure mapping class group of a surface of genus $g$ with $n$-punctures which becomes trivial on the closed surface. I am interested in the least dilatation of pseudo-Anosov pure surface braids. For the $n=1$ case, upper and lower bounds on the least dilatation were proved by Dowdall and Aougab—Taylor, respectively.  In this talk, I will describe the upper and lower bounds I have proved as a function of $g$ and $n$.

Wed, 28 Feb 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Dehn functions of one-relator groups

Giles Gardam
(Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)
Abstract


It is a classical theorem of Magnus that the word problem for one-relator groups is solvable; its precise complexity remains unknown. A geometric characterization of the complexity is given by the Dehn function. I will present joint work with Daniel Woodhouse showing that one-relator groups have a rich collection of Dehn functions, including the Brady--Bridson snowflake groups on which our work relies.

Wed, 28 Feb 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Dehn functions of one-relator groups

Giles Gardam
(Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)
Abstract

It is a classical theorem of Magnus that the word problem for one-relator groups is solvable; its precise complexity remains unknown. A geometric characterization of the complexity is given by the Dehn function. I will present joint work with Daniel Woodhouse showing that one-relator groups have a rich collection of Dehn functions, including the Brady--Bridson snowflake groups on which our work relies.
 

Wed, 21 Feb 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

CAT(0) cube complexes with prescribed local geometry and fly maps.

Federico Vigolio
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Cube Complexes with Coupled Links (CLCC) are a special family of non-positively curved cube complexes that are constructed by specifying what the links of their vertices should be. In this talk I will introduce the construction of CLCCs and try to motivate it by explaining how one can use information about the local geometry of a cube complex to deduce global properties of its fundamental group (e.g. hyperbolicity and cohomological dimension). On the way, I will also explain what fly maps are and how to use them to deduce that a CAT(0) cube complex is hyperbolic.

Wed, 14 Feb 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Splittings of free groups

Ric Wade
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will discuss topological and algebraic aspects of splittings of free groups. In particular we will look at the core of two splittings in terms of CAT(0) cube complexes and systems of surfaces in a doubled handlebody.

Wed, 07 Feb 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Flats in CAT(0) spaces

Sam Shepherd
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

CAT(0) spaces are defined as having triangles that are no fatter than Euclidean triangles, so it is no surprise that under special conditions  you find pieces of the Euclidean plane appearing in CAT(0) spaces. What is surprising though is how weak these special conditions seem to be. I will present some well known results of this phenomenon, along with detailed sketch proofs.

Wed, 31 Jan 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Algebraic integers arising as stretch factors of surface homemorphisms

Mehdi Yazdi
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

I will talk about the properties of algebraic integers that can arise as stretch factors of pseudo-Anosoc maps. I will mention a conjecture of Fried on which numbers supposedly arise and Thurston’s theorem that proves a similar result in the context of automorphisms of free groups. Then I will talk about recent developments on the Fried conjecture namely, every Salem number has a power arising as a stretch factor. 

Wed, 24 Jan 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C4

The Algebraic Torus Theorem

Alex Margolis
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

I will discuss a wonderful structure theorem for finitely generated group containing a codimension one polycyclic-by-finite subgroup, due to Martin Dunwoody and Eric Swenson. I will explain how the theorem is motivated by the torus theorem for 3-manifolds, and examine some of the consequences of this theorem.

Wed, 17 Jan 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C4

RAAGs and Stable Commutator Length

Nicolaus Heuer
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Stable commutator length (scl) is a well established invariant of group elements g  (write scl(g)) and  has both geometric and algebraic meaning.

It is a phenomenon that many classes of non-positively curved groups have a gap in stable commutator length: For every non-trivial element g, scl(g) > C for some C>0. Such gaps may be found in hyperbolic groups, Baumslag-solitair groups, free products, Mapping class groups, etc. 
However, the exact size of this gap usually unknown, which is due to a lack of a good source of “quasimorphisms”.

In this talk I will construct a new source of quasimorphisms which yield optimal gaps and show that for Right-Angled Artin Groups and their subgroups the gap of stable commutator length is exactly 1/2. I will also show this gap for certain amalgamated free products.

Thu, 30 Nov 2017
16:00
C4

Antonio Afieri

Antonio Afieri
(Central European University)
Abstract

 In a recent paper Friedl, Zentner and Livingston asked when a sum of torus knots is concordant to an alternating knot. After a brief analysis of the problem in its full generality, I will describe some effective obstructions based on Floer type theories.