Combinatorial Theory Seminar

The saturation number of a graph is a famous and well-studied counterpoint to the Turán number, and the rainbow saturation number is a generalisation of the saturation number to the setting of coloured graphs. Specifically, for a given graph $F$, an edge-coloured graph is $F$-rainbow saturated if it does not contain a rainbow copy of $F$, but the addition of any non-edge in any colour creates a rainbow copy of $F$. The rainbow saturation number of $F$ is the minimum number of edges in an $F$-rainbow saturated graph on $n$ vertices. Girão, Lewis, and Popielarz conjectured that, like the saturation number, for all $F$ the rainbow saturation number is linear in $n$. I will present our attractive and elementary proof of this conjecture, and finish with a discussion of related results and open questions.

A cluster graph is a disjoint union of complete graphs. We consider the random $G(n,p)$ graph on $n$ vertices with connection probability $p$, conditioned on the rare event of being a cluster graph. There are three main motivations for our study.

1. For $p = 1/2$, each random cluster graph occurs with the same probability, resulting in the uniform distribution over set partitions. Interpreting such a partition as a graph adds additional structural information.
2. To study how the law of a well-studied object like $G(n,p)$ changes when conditioned on a rare event; an evidence of this fact is that the conditioned random graph overcomes a phase transition at $p=1/2$ (not present in the dense $G(n,p)$ model).
3. The original motivation was an application to community detection. Taking a random cluster graph as a model for a prior distribution of a partition into communities leads to significantly better community-detection performance.

This is joint work with Martijn Gösgens, Lukas Lüchtrath, Elena Magnanini and Élie de Panafieu.

Let $G$ be a $d$-regular graph of growing degree on $n$ vertices. Form a random subgraph $G_p$ of $G$ by retaining edge of $G$ independently with probability $p=p(d)$. Which conditions on $G$ suffice to observe a phase transition at $p=1/d$, similar to that in the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$, or, say, in a random subgraph of the binary hypercube $Q^d$?

We argue that in the supercritical regime $p=(1+\epsilon)/d$, $\epsilon>0$ a small constant, postulating that every vertex subset $S$ of $G$ of at most $n/2$ vertices has its edge boundary at least $C|S|$, for some large enough constant $C=C(\epsilon)>0$, suffices to guarantee likely appearance of the giant component in $G_p$. Moreover, its asymptotic order is equal to that in the random graph $G(n,(1+\epsilon)/n)$, and all other components are typically much smaller.

We also give examples demonstrating tightness of our main result in several key senses.

A joint work with Sahar Diskin, Joshua Erde and Mihyun Kang.