Given a manifold $M$ and a basepointed labelling space $X$ the space of unordered finite configurations in $M$ with labels in $X$, $C(M;X)$ is the space of finite unordered tuples of points in $M$, each point with an associated point in $X$. The space is topologised so that particles cannot collide. Given a compact submanifold $M_0\subset M$ we define $C(M,M_0;X)$ to be the space of unordered finite configuration in which points `vanish' in $M_0$. The scanning map is a homotopy equivalence between the configuration space and a section space of a certain $\Sigma^nX$-bundle over $M$. Throughout the 70s and 80s this map has been given several unsatisfactory and convoluted definitions. A natural question to ask is whether the map is equivariant under the diffeomorphism group of the underlying manifold. However, any description of the map relies heavily on `little round $\varepsilon$-balls' and so only actions by isometry have any chance at equivariance. The goal of this talk is to give a more natural definition of the scanning map and show that diffeomorphism equivariance is an easy consequence.
