TBD

We will give a relaxed introduction to some of the most classical dynamical systems - Anosov flows. These flows were highly influential in the development of ideas which the audience might be more familiar with. For example, Anosov flows give rise to exponential group growth and taut foliations, both of which we will discuss. Finally, we will talk about some recent work obstructing Anosov flows and their combinatorial analogs - veering triangulations

Property (T) was introduced by Kazhdan in the sixties to show that lattices in higher rank semisimple Lie groups are finitely generated. We will discuss some classical examples of groups that satisfy this property, with a particular focus on SL(3, R).

Graph braid groups are similar to braid groups, except that they are defined as ‘braids’ on a graph, rather than the real plane. We can think of graph braid groups in terms of the discrete configuration space of a graph, which is a CW-complex. One can compute a presentation of a graph braid group using Morse theory. In this talk I will give a few examples on how to compute these presentations in terms of generating circuits of the graph. I will then go through a detailed example of a graph that gives a one-ended braid group.

For a hyperbolic knot there are two types of invariants, the hyperbolic invariants coming from the geometric structure and the classical invariants coming from the topology or combinatorics. It has been observed in many different cases that these seemingly different types of invariants are in fact related. I will give examples of these relationships and discuss in particular a link by Stoimenow between the determinant and volume.  

The Ivanov conjecture is equivalent to the statement that every covering map of surfaces has the so-called Putman-Wieland property. I will discuss my recent work with Vlad Marković, where we prove it for asymptotically all coverings as the degree grows. I will give some overview of our main tool: spectral geometry, which is related to objects like the heat kernel of a hyperbolic surface, or Cheeger connectivity constant.

Questions in algebra, while deep and interesting, can be incredibly difficult. Thankfully, when studying the representation theory of the symmetric groups, one can often take algebraic properties and results and write them in the language of combinatorics; where one has a wide variety of tools and techniques to use. In this talk, we will look at the specific example of the submodule structure of 2-part Specht modules in characteristic 2, and answer which hook Specht modules are uniserial in characteristic 2. We will not need to assume the Riemann hypothesis for this talk.

Join us for a discussion about preparing for PhD and PostDoc Interviews. We will be talking to Melanie Rupflin and Mura Yakerson.