Past Junior Number Theory Seminar

For every positive integer N and every α ∈ [0,1), let B(N, α) denote the probabilistic model in which a random set A of (1,...,N) is constructed by choosing independently every element of (1,...,N) with probability α. We prove that, as N → +∞, for every A in B(N, α) we have |AA| ~ |A|^2/2 with probability 1-o(1), if and only if (log(α^2(log N)^{log 4-1}))(√loglog N) → ∞. This improves on a theorem of Cilleruelo, Ramana and Ramar\'e, who proved the above asymptotic between |AA| and |A|^2/2 when α =o(1/√log N), and supplies a complete characterization of maximal product sets of random sets.

I will briefly introduce the Chabauty-Kim argument for effective finiteness results on "topologically rich enough" curves. I will then introduce the Fontaine-Mazur conjecture and show how it provides an effective proof of Faltings' Theorem.

In the case of non-CM elliptic curves minus a point, following work of Federico Amadio Guidi, I'll show how the relevant input for effective finiteness is provided by the vanishing of adjoint Selmer groups proven by Newton and Thorne.

This talk will be the first in a spin-off series on the Lawrence-Venkatesh approach to showing that every hyperbolic curve$/K$ has finitely many $K$-points. In this talk, we will give the overall outline of the approach and prove several of  the preliminary results, such as Faltings' finiteness theorem for semisimple Galois representations.

In 1966 Chen Jingrun showed that every large even integer can be written as the sum of two primes or the sum of a prime and a semiprime. To date, this weakened version of Goldbach's conjecture is one of the most remarkable results of sieve theory. I will talk about the big ideas which paved the way to this proof and the ingenious trick which led to Chen's success. No prior knowledge of sieve theory required – all necessary techniques will be introduced in the talk.

We will discuss the problem of deciding (algorithmically) whether a variety over a local field K has a K-rational point, surveying some known results. I will then allow K to be an infinite extension (of some arithmetic interest) of a local field and present some recent work.
 

Let C be an elliptic or hyperelliptic curve over a p-adic field K. Then C is equipped with a Galois representation, given by the action of the absolute Galois group of K on the Tate module of C. The behaviour of this representation depends on the reduction type of C. We will focus on the case of C having bad reduction, and acquiring potentially good reduction over a wildly ramified extension of K. We will show that, if C is an elliptic curve, the Galois representation can be completely determined in this case, thus allowing one to fully classify Galois representations attached to elliptic curves. Furthermore, the same can be done for a special family of hyperelliptic curves, obtaining a result which is surprisingly similar to that for the corresponding elliptic curves case.
 

We will survey an analogy between random integers and random permutations, which goes back to works of Erdős and Kac and of Billingsley.
This analogy inspired results and proofs about permutations, originating in the setting of integers, and vice versa.
Extensions of this analogy will be described, involving the generalized Ewens measure on permutations, based on joint work with D. Elboim.
If time permits, an analogous analogy, this time between random polynomials over a finite field and random permutations, will be discussed and formalized, with some applications.
 

Chowla's conjecture from the 1960s is the assertion that the Möbius function does not correlate with its own shifts. I'll discuss some recent works where with collaborators we have made progress on this conjecture.

In this talk, I will talk about two seemingly disjoint topics - Vinogradov’s mean value theorem, a classically important topic of study in additive number theory concerning solutions to a specific system of diophantine equations, and Incidence geometry, a collection of combinatorial results which focus on estimating the number of incidences between an arbitrary set of points and curves. I will give a brief overview of these two topics along with some basic proofs and applications, and then point out how these subjects connect together.

Local-to-global principles are a key tool in arithmetic geometry. Through a theorem of Siegel on representations of totally positive numbers as sums of squares in number fields we give a concrete introduction to the Hasse principle, and briefly talk about other local-to-global principles. No prerequisites from algebraic number theory are assumed, although some familiarity is helpful for context.

I will discuss some of Mazur's work about congruences between Eisenstein series and cusp forms, and then end with an application to class groups of fields $\mathbb{Q}(N^{1/p})$, where $N$ and $p$ are primes.  I will only assume some algebraic number theory.  In particular, nothing about modular forms will be assumed.
 

Given an extension L/K of number fields, we say that the Hasse norm principle (HNP) holds if every non-zero element of K which is a norm everywhere locally is in fact a global norm from L. If L/K is cyclic, the original Hasse norm theorem states that the HNP holds. More generally, there is a cohomological description (due to Tate) of the obstruction to the HNP for Galois extensions. In this talk, I will present work (joint with Rachel Newton) developing explicit methods to study this principle for non-Galois extensions. As a key application, I will describe how these methods can be used to characterize the HNP for extensions whose normal closure has Galois group A_n or S_n. I will additionally discuss some recent generalizations of these methods to study the Hasse principle and weak approximation for multinorm equations as well as consequences in the statistics of these local-global principles.

Sieve methods are analytic tools that we can use to tackle problems in additive number theory. This talk will serve as a gentle introduction to the area. At the end we will discuss recent progress on a variation on the prime $k$-tuples conjecture which involves sums of two squares. No knowledge of sieves is required!

We discuss the problem in representation theory of decomposing restricted representations. We start classically with the symmetric groups via Young diagrams and Young tableaux, and then move into the world of Lie groups. These problems have connections with both physics and number theory, and if there is time I will discuss the Gan-Gross-Prasad conjectures which predict results on restrictions for algebraic groups over both local and global fields. The pre-requisites will build throughout the talk, but it should be accessible to anyone with some knowedge of both finite groups and Lie groups.

In this talk I will give an introduction to random multiplicative functions, and cover the recent developments in this area. I will also explain how RMF's are connected to some of the important open problems in Analytic Number Theory.

In 1983, Faltings proved Mordell's conjecture on the finiteness of $K$-points on curves of genus >1 defined over a number field $K$ by proving the finiteness of isomorphism classes of isogenous abelian varieties over $K$. The "first" major step from Mordell's conjecture to what Faltings did came 15 years earlier when Parshin showed that a certain conjecture of Shafarevich would imply Mordell's conjecture. In this talk, I'll focus on motivating and sketching Parshin's argument in an accessible manner and provide some heuristics on how to get from Faltings' finiteness statement to the Shafarevich conjecture.

A remarkable theorem due to Khovanskii asserts that for any finite subset $A$ of an abelian group, the cardinality of the $h$-fold sumset $hA$ grows like a polynomial for all sufficiently large $h$. However, neither the polynomial nor what sufficiently large means are understood in general. We obtain an effective version of Khovanskii's theorem for any $A \subset \mathbb{Z}$ whose convex hull is a simplex; previously such results were only available for $d = 1$. Our approach also gives information about the structure of $hA$, answering a recent question posed by Granville and Shakan. The work is joint with Leo Goldmakher at Williams College.

The Dirichlet class number formula gives an expression for the residue at s=1 of the Dedekind zeta function of a number field K in terms of certain quantities associated to K. Among those is the regulator of K, a certain determinant involving logarithms of units in K. In the 1980s, Don Zagier gave a conjectural expression for the values at integers s $\geq$ 2 in terms of "higher regulators", with polylogarithms in place of logarithms. The goal of this talk is to give an algebraic-geometric interpretation of these polylogarithms. Time permitting, we will also discuss a similar picture for Hasse--Weil L-functions of elliptic curves.
 

The Riemann hypothesis (RH) is one of the great open problems in mathematics. It arose from the study of prime numbers in an analytic context, and—as often occurs in mathematics—developed analogies in an algebraic setting, leading to the influential Weil conjectures. RH for curves over finite fields was proven in the 1940’s by Weil using algebraic-geometric methods. In this talk, we discuss an alternate proof of this result by Stepanov (and Bombieri), using only elementary properties of polynomials. Over the decades, the proof has been whittled down to a 5 page gem! Time permitting, we also indicate connections to exponential sums and the original RH.
 

We will discuss some problems around independence of l in compatible systems of Galois representations, mostly focusing on the independence of l of algebraic monodromy groups. We will explain how these problems fit into the context of the Langlands program, and present results both in characteristic zero and in positive characteristic settings.

Understanding the size of the rational points on a curve of higher genus is one of the major open problems in the theory of Diophantine equations. In this talk I will discuss the related problem of understanding how close together rational points can get. I will also discuss the relation to the subject of (generalised) Wieferich primes.

The goal of this talk is to introduce a way to use the philosophy of Random Matrix Theory to understand, pose, and maybe even solve problems about p-adic matrices.

A long time ago, Grothendieck made some conjectures. This has resulted in some things.