During the last fifteen years, there has been a paradigm shift in the continuum modelling of granular materials; most notably with the development of rheological models, such as the μ(I)-rheology (where μ is the friction and I is the inertial number), but also with significant advances in theories for particle segregation. This talk details theoretical and numerical frameworks (based on OpenFOAM®) which unify these disconnected endeavours. Coupling the segregation with the flow, and vice versa, is not only vital for a complete theory of granular materials, but is also beneficial for developing numerical methods to handle evolving free surfaces. This general approach is based on the partially regularized incompressible μ(I)-rheology, which is coupled to a theory for gravity/shear-driven segregation (Gray & Ancey, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 678, 2011, pp. 353–588). These advection–diffusion–segregation equations describe the evolving concentrations of the constituents, which then couple back to the variable viscosity in the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. A novel feature of this approach is that any number of differently sized phases may be included, which may have disparate frictional properties. The model is used to simulate the complex particle-size segregation patterns that form in a partially filled triangular rotating drum. There are many other applications of the theory to industrial granular flows, which are the second most common material used after fluids. The same processes also occur in geophysical flows, such as snow avalanches, debris flows and dense pyroclastic flows. Depth-averaged models, that go beyond the μ(I)-rheology, will also be derived to capture spontaneous self-channelization and levee formation, as well as complex segregation-induced flow fingering effects, which enhance the run-out distance of these hazardous flows.

It was shown by Balasubramanya that any acylindrically hyperbolic group (a natural generalisation of a hyperbolic group) must act acylindrically and non-elementarily on some quasi-tree. It is therefore sensible to ask to what extent this is true for trees, i.e. given an acylindrically hyperbolic group, does it admit a non-elementary acylindrical action on some simplicial tree? In this talk I will introduce the concepts of acylindrically hyperbolic and acylindrically arboreal groups and discuss some particularly interesting examples of acylindrically hyperbolic groups which do and do not act acylindrically on trees.

This talk will present a new characterisation of rectifiable subsets of a complete metric space in terms of local approximation, with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, by finite dimensional Banach spaces. Time permitting, we will discuss recent joint work with Hyde and Schul that provides quantitative analogues of this statement.
 

to follow

to follow