Forthcoming events in this series


Wed, 27 Nov 2024

17:00 - 18:30
L5

Truth Be Told: How To Interpret Past Mathematicians

A.C. Paseau and Fabian Pregel
(Department of Philosophy, University of Oxford)
Abstract

How should we interpret past mathematicians who may use the same vocabulary as us but with different meanings, or whose philosophical outlooks differ from ours? Errors aside, it is often assumed that past mathematicians largely made true claims—but what exactly justifies that assumption?


In this talk, we will explore these questions through general philosophical considerations and three case studies: 19th-century analysis, 18th-century geometry, and 19th-century matricial algebra.  In each case, we encounter a significant challenge to supposing that the mathematicians in question made true claims. We will show how these challenges can be addressed and overcome.

Mon, 04 Nov 2024

14:30 - 15:30
L6

History and highlights of the Kerala school of mathematics

Aditya Kolachana
(IIT Madras)
Further Information

Dr. Aditya Kolachana is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai. He heads the Centre for Indian Knowledge Systems at IIT Madras where his research delves into India's scientific and cultural heritage. He is a recipient of the Young Historian of Science Award instituted by the Indian National Science Academy and the Best Teacher Award at IIT Madras. 

Abstract

During the 14th to the 16th centuries CE, a succession of Indian scholars, collectively referred to as the Kerala school, made remarkable contributions in the fields of mathematics and astronomy. Mādhava of Saṅgamagrāma, a gifted mathematician and astronomer, is considered the founder of this school, and is perhaps best known for discovering an infinite series for pi, among other achievements. Subsequently, Mādhava's lineage of disciples, consisting of illustrious names such as Parameśvara, Dāmodara, Nīlakaṇṭha, Jyeṣṭhadeva, Śaṅkara Vāriyar, Citrabhānu, Acyuta Piṣaraṭi etc., made numerous important contributions of their own in the fields of mathematics and astronomy. Later scholars of the Kerala school flourished up to the 19th century. This talk will provide a historical overview of the Kerala school and highlight its important contributions.

Wed, 29 May 2024

17:00 - 18:30
L4

More Pope-like than the Pope: modern mathematics movement in Czechoslovakia

Helena Durnová
(Masaryk University)
Abstract
Modern mathematics movement of the early 20th century found its way into the teaching of mathematics across the world in the early post-war period, with Georges Papy and André Lichnerowicz leading the way in Europe. In Czechoslovakia, this transformation of mathematics education is known as “set-theoretical approach”. Indeed set theory is at the core of Bourbakist transformation of the mathematical knowledge, as exemplified by their masterpiece Élements de Mathématique, which became mathematicians’ manifesto. In the educational setting, the adjectives “new” and “modern” were found more appropriate, but not so in Czechoslovakia. 
 
Dirk de Bock’s recent book on the topic (Modern Mathematics: An International Movement?, Springer 2023) covers a lot of Modern Math, but Czechoslovakia is missing, and here we are. Czechoslovakia is at the heart of Europe, perhaps the heart of Europe. Hence we connect to other countries: Poland, Hungary, Soviet Union, but also Belgium, France, Sweden (marginally), the Netherlands, and Yugoslavia as a very special case.
 
This seminar reports on a joint project of Helena Durnová, Petra Bušková (Masaryk University), Danny J. Beckers (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), and Snezana Lawrence (Middlesex University).
Wed, 06 Mar 2024
17:00
L5

The Conceptualization of Mathematics in Pharaonic Egypt

Annette Imhausen
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main)
Further Information

A joint History of Mathematics/Egyptology and Ancient Near Eastern Studies Seminar

Abstract

Ancient Egypt is credited (along with Mesopotamia) for providing the oldest extant mathematical texts. Since the 19th century, when the first edition of the Rhind mathematical papyrus was published, it has held an important role in the historiography of mathematics. One of the earliest researchers in the field of ancient Egyptian sciences was Otto Neugebauer who has been a major influence on the early development of the field. While research in Egyptian mathematics initially focused on those aspects that could be linked to its possible successors in modern mathematics, research has also revealed various characteristics that could not easily be transferred into a modern equivalent. In addition, research on other sciences, like medicine and astronomy, has yielded further evidence that a limitation on those aspects that have successors in modern sciences will at best give an incomplete picture of ancient scholarship. This will be explored in a new long-term project, which is briefly sketched. In the context of this project, Egyptian mathematics is also studied. The talk will present an example from the terminology used in Egyptian mathematical texts to describe this area of knowledge and explore its epistemological consequences for our studies of ancient Egyptian mathematics and aim to situate it in its ancient context.

Wed, 22 Nov 2023

17:15 - 18:30
Magrath Room, Queen's

Mathematising certainty in the 18th century. Jacob Bernoulli’s and Thomas Bayes’ redefinition of “absolute” and “moral” certainty through probability calculus

Dinh-Vinh Colomban
(Université Paris Nanterre)
Abstract

In the 17th century, certainty was still largely organized around heterogeneous categories such as “absolute certainty” and “moral certainty”. “Absolute certainty” was the highest kind of certainty rather than degree and it was limited to metaphysical and mathematical demonstrations. On the other hand, “moral certainty” was a high degree of assent which, even though it was subjective and always fallible, was regarded as sufficient for practical decisions based on empirical evidence. Although this duality between “moral” and “absolute” certainty remained in use well into the 18th century, its meaning shifted with the emergence of the calculus of probabilities. Probability calculus provided tools for attempts to mathematise “moral certainty” which would have been a contradiction in terms in their classical 17th-century sense.

Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi (1713) followed by Thomas Bayes and Richard Price's An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances (1763) reshuffled what was before mutually exclusive characteristics of those categories of certainty. Moral certainty became mathematizable and measurable, while absolute certainty would sit in continuity in degree with moral certainty rather than be different in kind. The concept of certainty as a whole is thus redefined as a quantitative continuum.

This transformation lays the conceptual foundations for a new approach to knowledge. Knowledge and even scientific knowledge are no longer defined by a binary model of an absolute exclusion of uncertainty, but rather by the accuracy of measurement of the irreducible uncertainty in all empirical-based knowledge. Such measurement becomes possible thanks to the new tools provided by the emergence of probability calculus.

Wed, 31 May 2023

16:00 - 17:00
L4

Mathematics and its history, through literature

Sarah Hart
(Birkbeck, University of London)
Abstract

Mathematics has always been part of the fabric of culture. References to mathematics in literature go back at least as far as Aristophanes, and encompass everyone from Dostoevsky to Oscar Wilde. In this talk I’ll explore some of the ways that literature has engaged with mathematical ideas, from the 17th and 18th century obsession with the cycloid (the “Helen of Geometry”) to the 19th century love of the fourth dimension.

Wed, 22 Feb 2023

17:00 - 18:30
L4

On the uses and abuses of the history of mathematics

Nicolas Michel
(Bergische Universitaet Wuppertal)
Abstract

Mathematicians frequently present their own work in a diachronic fashion, e.g. by comparing their "modern" methods to those supposedly of the "Ancients," or by situating their latest theories as an "abstract" counterpart to more "classical" ones. The construction of such contrasts entangle mathematical labour and cultural life writ large. Indeed, it involves on the part of mathematicians the shaping up of correspondences between their technical achievements and intellectual discussions taking place on a much broader stage, such as those surrounding the concept of modernity, its relation to an imagined ancient past, or the characterisation of scientific progress as an increase in abstraction. This talk will explore the creation and use of such mathematical diachronies, the focus being on the works of Felix Klein, Hieronymus Zeuthen, and Hermann Schubert.

Wed, 15 Feb 2023
17:00
L4

On Green’s theorem: a visual history through textbooks and other printed matter

Rogério Monteiro de Siqueira
(Universidade de São Paolo)
Abstract

Although Green's theorem, currently considered one of the cornerstones of multivariate calculus, was published in 1828, its widespread introduction into calculus textbooks can be traced back to the first decades of the twentieth century, when vector calculus emerged as a slightly autonomous discipline. In addition, its contemporary version (and its demonstration), currently found in several calculus textbooks, is the result of some adaptations during its almost 200 years of life. Comparing some books and articles from this long period, I would like to discuss in this lecture the didactic adaptations, the editorial strategies and visual representations that shaped the theorem in its current form.

Mon, 24 Oct 2022

14:00 - 15:30
L3

Going All Round the Houses: Mathematics, Horoscopes and History before 1600

Stephen Johnston
(History of Science Museum, Oxford)
Abstract

To be a mathematicus in 15th- and 16th-century Europe often meant practising as an astrologer. Far from being an unwelcome obligation, or simply a means of paying the rent, astrology frequently represented a genuine form of mathematical engagement. This is most clearly seen by examining changing definitions of one of the key elements of horoscope construction: the astrological houses. These twelve houses are divisions of the zodiac circle and their character fundamentally affects the significance of the planets which occupy them at any particular moment in time. While there were a number of competing systems for defining the houses, one system was standard throughout medieval Europe. However, the 16th-century witnessed what John North referred to as a “minor revolution”, as a different technique first developed in the Islamic world but adopted and promoted by Johannes Regiomontanus became increasingly prevalent. My paper reviews this shift in astrological practice and investigates the mathematical values it represents – from aesthetics and geometrical representation to efficiency and computational convenience.

Thu, 09 Jun 2022

16:00 - 18:00
Queen's College

“So Fair a Subterraneous City”: Mining, Maps, and the Politics of Geometry in the Seventeenth Century

Thomas Morel
(Bergische Universitaet Wuppertal)
Further Information

Venue: Shulman Auditorium, Queen's

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), the mining regions of Central Europe underwent numerous technical and political evolutions. In this context, the role of underground geometry expanded considerably: drawing mining maps and working on them became widespread in the second half of the seventeenth century. The new mathematics of subterranean surveyors finally realized the old dream of “seeing through stones,” gradually replacing alternative tools such as written reports of visitations, wood models, or commented sketches.

I argue that the development of new cartographic tools to visualize the underground was deeply linked to broad changes in the political structure of mining regions. In Saxony, arguably the leading mining region, captain-general Abraham von Schönberg (1640–1711) put his weight and reputation behind the new geometrical technology, hoping that its acceptance would in turn help him advance his reform agenda. At-scale representations were instrumental in justifying new investments, while offering technical road maps to implement them.

 

Tue, 31 May 2022

16:00 - 18:00
L5

'My avid fellow feeling' and 'Fleas': Playing with words on the computer

Troy Astarte
(Swansea University)
Abstract

Computers have been used to process natural language for many years. This talk considers two historical examples of computers used rather to play with human language, one well-known and the other a new archival discovery: Strachey’s 1952 love letters program, and a poetry programming competition held at Newcastle University in 1968. Strachey’s program used random number generation to pick words to fit into a template, resulting in letters of varying quality, and apparently much amusement for Strachey. The poetry competition required the entrants, mostly PhD students, to write programs whose output or source code was in some way poetic: the entries displayed remarkable ingenuity. Various analyses of Strachey’s work depict it as a parody of attitudes to love, an artistic endeavour, or as a technical exploration. In this talk I will consider how these apply to the Newcastle competition and add my own interpretations.

Wed, 11 May 2022

14:30 - 16:00
L4

Questions of collaboration and credit in D’Arcy Thompson’s 'On Growth and Form'

Deborah Kent
(University of St Andrews)
Abstract

The first edition of Thompson’s famous book On Growth and Form appeared in 1917. It has subsequently been regarded as a foundational work in mathematical biology and a revolutionary contribution to the field of morphology. Most existing literature credits Thompson as a lone genius who produced the 793 pages of the 1917 edition and 1116 pages of the 1942 edition. Thompson’s correspondence presents a very different picture of this tome as one arising from extensive and ongoing – perhaps sometimes unwitting? – collaboration.

Tue, 03 Dec 2019

11:00 - 12:00
L6

Babbage's mechanical notation

Adrian Johnstone
(Royal Holloway University of London)
Abstract

Charles Babbage (1791–1871) was Lucasian Professor of mathematics in Cambridge from 1828–1839. He displayed a fertile curiosity that led him to study many contemporary processes and problems in a way which emphasised an analytic, data driven view of life.

In popular culture Babbage has been celebrated as an anachronistic Victorian engineer. In reality, Babbage is best understood as a figure rooted in the enlightenment, who had substantially completed his core investigations into 'mechanisation of thought' by the mid 1830s: he is thus an anachronistic Georgian: the construction of his first difference engine design is contemporary with the earliest public railways in Britain.

A fundamental question that must strike anybody who examines Babbage's precocious designs is: how could one individual working alone have synthesised a workable computer design, designing an object whose complexity of behaviour so far exceeded that of contemporary machines that it would not be matched for over a hundred years?

We shall explore the extent to which the answer lies in the techniques Babbage developed to reason about complex systems. His Notation which shows the geometry, timing, causal chains and the abstract components of his machines, has a direct parallel in the Hardware Description Languages developed since 1975 to aid the design of large scale electronics. In this presentation, we shall provide a basic tutorial on Babbage's notation showing how his concepts of 'pieces' and 'working points' effectively build a graph in which both parts and their interactions are represented by nodes, with edges between part-nodes and interaction-nodes denoting ownership, and edges between interaction-nodes denoting the transmission of forces between individual assemblies within a machine. We shall give examples from Babbage's Difference Engine 2 for which a complete set of notations was drawn in 1849, and compare them to a design of similar complexity specified in 1987 using the Inmos HDL.

Mon, 25 Nov 2019

17:00 - 18:00
L4

Crossing the Pond: European Mathematicians in 1920s America

Karen Hunger Parshall
(University of Virginia)
Abstract

American mathematics was experiencing growing pains in the 1920s. It had looked to Europe at least since the 1890s when many Americans had gone abroad to pursue their advanced mathematical studies.  It was anxious to assert itself on the international—that is, at least at this moment in time, European—mathematical scene. How, though, could the Americans change the European perception from one of apprentice/master to one of mathematical equals? How could Europe, especially Germany but to a lesser extent France, Italy, England, and elsewhere, come fully to sense the development of the mathematical United States?  If such changes could be effected at all, they would likely involve American and European mathematicians in active dialogue, working shoulder to shoulder in Europe and in the United States, and publishing side by side in journals on both sides of the Atlantic. This talk will explore one side of this “equation”: European mathematicians and their experiences in the United States in the 1920s.

Tue, 12 Nov 2019

15:30 - 16:30
L5

Re-Engineering History: A Playful Demonstration

Tom Ritchie
(University of Kent)
Abstract

This session will discuss how Douglas Hartree and Arthur Porter used Meccano — a child’s toy and an engineer’s tool — to build an analogue computer, the Hartree Differential Analyser in 1934. It will explore the wider historical and social context in which this model computer was rooted, before providing an opportunity to engage with the experiential aspects of the 'Kent Machine,' a historically reproduced version of Hartree and Porter's original model, which is also made from Meccano.

The 'Kent Machine' sits at a unique intersection of historical research and educational engagement, providing an alternative way of teaching STEM subjects, via a historic hands-on method. The session builds on the work and ideas expressed in Otto Sibum's reconstruction of James Joule's 'Paddle Wheel' apparatus, inviting attendees to physically re-enact the mathematical processes of mechanical integration to see how this type of analogue computer functioned in reality. The session will provide an alternative context of the history of computing by exploring the tacit knowledge that is required to reproduce and demonstrate the machine, and how it sits at the intersection between amateur and professional science.

Tue, 25 Jun 2019

17:00 - 18:00
L4

On the circulation structures in traditional Chinese algorithms

GUO Shirong
(Institute for the History of Science and Technology,Inner Mongolia Normal University)
Abstract

It is unnecessary to emphasize important place of algorithms in computer science. Many efficient and convenient algorithms are designed by borrowing or revising ancient mathematical algorithms and methods. For example, recursive method, exhaustive search method, greedy method, “divide and conquer” method, dynamic programming method, reiteration algorithm, circulation algorithm, among others.

 

From the perspective of the history of computer science, it is necessary to study the history of algorithms used in the computer computations. The history of algorithms for computer science is naturally regarded as a sub-object of history of mathematics. But historians of mathematics, at least those who study history of mathematics in China, have not realized it is important in the history of mathematics. Historians of Chinese mathematics paid little attention to these studies, mainly having not considered from this research angle. Relevant research is therefore insufficient in the field of history of mathematics.

 

The mechanization thought and algorithmization characteristic of Chinese traditional (and therefore, East Asian) mathematics, however, are coincident with that of computer science. Traditional Chinese algorithms, therefore, show their importance historical significance in computer science. It is necessary and important to survey traditional algorithms again from the point of views of computer science. It is also another angle for understanding traditional Chinese mathematics.

 

There are many things in the field that need to be researched. For example, when and how were these algorithms designed? What was their mathematical background? How were they applied in ancient mathematical context? How are their complexity and efficiency of ancient algorithms?

 

In the present paper, we will study the circulation structure in traditional Chinese mathematical algorithms. Circulation structures have great importance in the computer science. Most algorithms are designed by means of one or more circulation structures. Ancient Chinese mathematicians were familiar them with the circulation structures and good at their applications. They designed a lot of circulation structures to obtain their desirable results in mathematical computations. Their circulation structures of dozen ancient algorithms will be analyzed. They are selected from mathematical and astronomical treatises, and also one from the Yijing (Book of Changes), the oldest of the Chinese classics.

Tue, 12 Mar 2019

14:00 - 15:00
C2

Jacob Bernoulli’s role in the history of elasticity: From a discussion with a craftsman to the discovery of the elasticity rules

Sepideh Alassi
(University of Basel)
Abstract

Jacob Bernoulli is known for his studies of the curves, infinitesimal math- ematics and statistics. However, before being a professor in mathematics, he taught experimental physics at the University of Basel. This explains his high interest in solving physical problems with newly developed Leibnizian calculus. In his scientific notebook, Meditationes, there are more than thirty notes about various mechanical problems for solving of which Bernoulli has applied Leibnizian calculus and has advanced this method along the way. A discussion with a craftsman brought Bernoulli’s attention to the problem of the strength of a beam early in his career and occupied his mind until his death. The craftsman’s narration based on his experience highlighted the flaws in Galilean-Leibnizian theory of the strength of a beam. This was the starting point of Bernoulli’s quest to mathematically find the profile of a bent beam (the Elastica Problem) and the physical laws governing it. He started a challenge to encourage other mathematicians of the time to study the problem, providing a hint hidden in an anagram. Although he published his solution of the Elastica Problem in 1694, that was not the end of the quest for him. Studying his unpublished notes in Meditationes reveals that over the last decade of his life, Bernoulli has reconsidered the problem. In my project, I demonstrate that he has found remarkable concepts such as mean tensile stress, and the notion of local stress-strain relation, etc.

Mon, 18 Feb 2019

17:00 - 18:00
L5

A Beautiful Game from the War: Piet Hein, John Nash, Martin Gardner and Hex

Ryan Hayward
(University of Alberta)
Abstract

Seeking income during World War II, Piet Hein created the game now called Hex, marketing it through the Danish newspaper Politiken.  The game was popular but disappeared in 1943 when Hein fled Denmark.

The game re-appeared in 1948 when John Nash introduced it to Princeton's game theory group, and became popular again in 1957 after Martin Gardner's column --- "Concerning the game of Hex, which may be played on the tiles of the bathroom floor" --- appeared in Scientific American.

I will survey the early history of Hex, highlighting the war's influence on Hein's design and marketing, Hein's mysterious puzzle-maker, and Nash's fascination with Hex's theoretical properties.

Tue, 04 Dec 2018

14:00 - 15:00
L6

The Oberwolfach Research Institute for Mathematics, 1944-1963

Volker Remmert
(Bergische Universitat Wuppertal)
Abstract

The Oberwolfach Research Institute for Mathematics (Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach/MFO) was founded in late 1944 by the Freiburg mathematician Wilhelm Süss (1895-1958) as the „National Institute for Mathematics“. In the 1950s and 1960s the MFO developed into an increasingly international conference centre.

The aim of my project is to analyse the history of the MFO as it institutionally changed from the National Institute for Mathematics with a wide, but standard range of responsibilities, to an international social infrastructure for research completely new in the framework of German academia. The project focusses on the evolvement of the institutional identity of the MFO between 1944 and the early 1960s, namely the development and importance of the MFO’s scientific programme (workshops, team work, Bourbaki) and the instruments of research employed (library, workshops) as well as the corresponding strategies to safeguard the MFO’s existence (for instance under the wings of the Max-Planck-Society). In particular, three aspects are key to the project, namely the analyses of the historical processes of (1) the development and shaping of the MFO’s workshop activities, (2) the (complex) institutional safeguarding of the MFO, and (3) the role the MFO played for the re-internationalisation of mathematics in Germany. Thus the project opens a window on topics of more general relevance in the history of science such as the complexity of science funding and the re-internationalisation of the sciences in the early years of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Fri, 09 Nov 2018

15:00 - 16:00
C1

Formulating a theory - mathematics in Thomson and Rutherford's collaboration on x-ray ionisation

Isobel Falconer
(University of St Andrews)
Abstract

In 1897 J.J. Thomson 'discovered' the electron. The previous year, he and his research student Ernest Rutherford (later to 'discover' theatomic nucleus), collaborated in experiments to work out why gases exposed to x-rays became conducting. 


This talk will discuss the very different mathematical educations of the two men, and the impact these differences had on their experimental investigation and the theory they arrived at. This theory formed the backdrop to Thomson's electron work the following year. 

Fri, 27 Jul 2018

16:30 - 17:15
L6

How did Chinese deal with a scientific problem: Building the solar eclipse theory in ancient China (the 7th-10th century AD)

Anjing Qu
(Xi'an)
Abstract

In the 6th century, the phenomena of irregularity of the solar motion and parallax of the moon were found by Chinese astronomers. This made the calculation of solar eclipse much more complex than before. The strategy that Chinese calendar-makers dealt with was different from the geometrical model system like Greek astronomers taken as. What Chinese astronomers chose is a numerical algorithm system which was widely taken as a thinking mode to construct the theory of mathematical astronomy in old China. 

Fri, 27 Jul 2018

16:00 - 16:30
L6

William Burnside and the Mystery Letter

Howard Emmens
Abstract

Relatively little is known about the correspondence of William Burnside, a pioneer of group theory in the UK. There are only a few dozen extant letters from or to him, though they are not without interest. However, one of the most noteworthy letters to or at least about him, in that it had a special mention in his obituary in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, has not been positively identified. It's not clear who it was from or when it was sent. We'll look at some possibilities.

Fri, 27 Jul 2018

15:00 - 15:30
L6

Meeting under the integral sign? The 1936 Oslo International Congress of Mathematicians

Christopher Hollings
(Oxford)
Abstract

The International Congresses of Mathematicians (ICMs) have taken place at (reasonably) regular intervals since 1897, and although their participants may have wanted to confine these events purely to mathematics, they could not help but be affected by wider world events.  This is particularly true of the 1936 ICM, held in Oslo.  In this talk, I will give a whistle-stop tour of the early ICMs, before discussing the circumstances of the Oslo meeting, with a particular focus on the activities of the Nazi-led German delegation.

Fri, 27 Jul 2018

14:30 - 15:00
L6

About the nature of π: Proofs and conjectures in Lambert's Mémoire (1768)

Eduardo Dorrego López
(Seville)
Abstract

The emergence of analytic methods in the 17th century opened a new way in order to tackle the elucidation of certain quantities. The strong presence of the circle-squaring problem, focused mainly the attention on π, on which besides the serious doubts about its rationality, it arises an awareness---boosted by the new algebraic approach---of the difficulty of framing it inside algebraic boundaries. The term ``transcendence'' emerges in this context but with a very ambiguous meaning.

The first great step towards its comprehension, took place in the 18th century and came from Johann Heinrich Lambert's hand, who using a new analytical machinery---continued fractions---gave the first proof of irrationality of π. The problem of keeping this number inside the algebraic limits, also receives an especial attention at the end of his Mémoires sur quelques propriétés remarquables des quantités transcendantes, circulaires et logarithmiques, published by the Berlin Academy of Science in 1768. In this work, Lambert after giving to the term ``transcendence'' its modern meaning, conjectures the transcendence of π and therefore the impossibility of squaring the circle.