Past History of Mathematics Seminar

How should we interpret past mathematicians who may use the same vocabulary as us but with different meanings, or whose philosophical outlooks differ from ours? Errors aside, it is often assumed that past mathematicians largely made true claims—but what exactly justifies that assumption?

In this talk, we will explore these questions through general philosophical considerations and three case studies: 19th-century analysis, 18th-century geometry, and 19th-century matricial algebra.  In each case, we encounter a significant challenge to supposing that the mathematicians in question made true claims. We will show how these challenges can be addressed and overcome.

During the 14th to the 16th centuries CE, a succession of Indian scholars, collectively referred to as the Kerala school, made remarkable contributions in the fields of mathematics and astronomy. Mādhava of Saṅgamagrāma, a gifted mathematician and astronomer, is considered the founder of this school, and is perhaps best known for discovering an infinite series for pi, among other achievements. Subsequently, Mādhava's lineage of disciples, consisting of illustrious names such as Parameśvara, Dāmodara, Nīlakaṇṭha, Jyeṣṭhadeva, Śaṅkara Vāriyar, Citrabhānu, Acyuta Piṣaraṭi etc., made numerous important contributions of their own in the fields of mathematics and astronomy. Later scholars of the Kerala school flourished up to the 19th century. This talk will provide a historical overview of the Kerala school and highlight its important contributions.

Ancient Egypt is credited (along with Mesopotamia) for providing the oldest extant mathematical texts. Since the 19th century, when the first edition of the Rhind mathematical papyrus was published, it has held an important role in the historiography of mathematics. One of the earliest researchers in the field of ancient Egyptian sciences was Otto Neugebauer who has been a major influence on the early development of the field. While research in Egyptian mathematics initially focused on those aspects that could be linked to its possible successors in modern mathematics, research has also revealed various characteristics that could not easily be transferred into a modern equivalent. In addition, research on other sciences, like medicine and astronomy, has yielded further evidence that a limitation on those aspects that have successors in modern sciences will at best give an incomplete picture of ancient scholarship. This will be explored in a new long-term project, which is briefly sketched. In the context of this project, Egyptian mathematics is also studied. The talk will present an example from the terminology used in Egyptian mathematical texts to describe this area of knowledge and explore its epistemological consequences for our studies of ancient Egyptian mathematics and aim to situate it in its ancient context.

In the 17^th century, certainty was still largely organized around heterogeneous categories such as “absolute certainty” and “moral certainty”. “Absolute certainty” was the highest kind of certainty rather than degree and it was limited to metaphysical and mathematical demonstrations. On the other hand, “moral certainty” was a high degree of assent which, even though it was subjective and always fallible, was regarded as sufficient for practical decisions based on empirical evidence. Although this duality between “moral” and “absolute” certainty remained in use well into the 18^th century, its meaning shifted with the emergence of the calculus of probabilities. Probability calculus provided tools for attempts to mathematise “moral certainty” which would have been a contradiction in terms in their classical 17th-century sense.

Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi (1713) followed by Thomas Bayes and Richard Price's An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances (1763) reshuffled what was before mutually exclusive characteristics of those categories of certainty. Moral certainty became mathematizable and measurable, while absolute certainty would sit in continuity in degree with moral certainty rather than be different in kind. The concept of certainty as a whole is thus redefined as a quantitative continuum.

This transformation lays the conceptual foundations for a new approach to knowledge. Knowledge and even scientific knowledge are no longer defined by a binary model of an absolute exclusion of uncertainty, but rather by the accuracy of measurement of the irreducible uncertainty in all empirical-based knowledge. Such measurement becomes possible thanks to the new tools provided by the emergence of probability calculus.

Mathematics has always been part of the fabric of culture. References to mathematics in literature go back at least as far as Aristophanes, and encompass everyone from Dostoevsky to Oscar Wilde. In this talk I’ll explore some of the ways that literature has engaged with mathematical ideas, from the 17^th and 18^th century obsession with the cycloid (the “Helen of Geometry”) to the 19^th century love of the fourth dimension.

Mathematicians frequently present their own work in a diachronic fashion, e.g. by comparing their "modern" methods to those supposedly of the "Ancients," or by situating their latest theories as an "abstract" counterpart to more "classical" ones. The construction of such contrasts entangle mathematical labour and cultural life writ large. Indeed, it involves on the part of mathematicians the shaping up of correspondences between their technical achievements and intellectual discussions taking place on a much broader stage, such as those surrounding the concept of modernity, its relation to an imagined ancient past, or the characterisation of scientific progress as an increase in abstraction. This talk will explore the creation and use of such mathematical diachronies, the focus being on the works of Felix Klein, Hieronymus Zeuthen, and Hermann Schubert.

Although Green's theorem, currently considered one of the cornerstones of multivariate calculus, was published in 1828, its widespread introduction into calculus textbooks can be traced back to the first decades of the twentieth century, when vector calculus emerged as a slightly autonomous discipline. In addition, its contemporary version (and its demonstration), currently found in several calculus textbooks, is the result of some adaptations during its almost 200 years of life. Comparing some books and articles from this long period, I would like to discuss in this lecture the didactic adaptations, the editorial strategies and visual representations that shaped the theorem in its current form.

To be a mathematicus in 15th- and 16th-century Europe often meant practising as an astrologer. Far from being an unwelcome obligation, or simply a means of paying the rent, astrology frequently represented a genuine form of mathematical engagement. This is most clearly seen by examining changing definitions of one of the key elements of horoscope construction: the astrological houses. These twelve houses are divisions of the zodiac circle and their character fundamentally affects the significance of the planets which occupy them at any particular moment in time. While there were a number of competing systems for defining the houses, one system was standard throughout medieval Europe. However, the 16th-century witnessed what John North referred to as a “minor revolution”, as a different technique first developed in the Islamic world but adopted and promoted by Johannes Regiomontanus became increasingly prevalent. My paper reviews this shift in astrological practice and investigates the mathematical values it represents – from aesthetics and geometrical representation to efficiency and computational convenience.

In the aftermath of the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), the mining regions of Central Europe underwent numerous technical and political evolutions. In this context, the role of underground geometry expanded considerably: drawing mining maps and working on them became widespread in the second half of the seventeenth century. The new mathematics of subterranean surveyors finally realized the old dream of “seeing through stones,” gradually replacing alternative tools such as written reports of visitations, wood models, or commented sketches.

I argue that the development of new cartographic tools to visualize the underground was deeply linked to broad changes in the political structure of mining regions. In Saxony, arguably the leading mining region, captain-general Abraham von Schönberg (1640–1711) put his weight and reputation behind the new geometrical technology, hoping that its acceptance would in turn help him advance his reform agenda. At-scale representations were instrumental in justifying new investments, while offering technical road maps to implement them.

Computers have been used to process natural language for many years. This talk considers two historical examples of computers used rather to play with human language, one well-known and the other a new archival discovery: Strachey’s 1952 love letters program, and a poetry programming competition held at Newcastle University in 1968. Strachey’s program used random number generation to pick words to fit into a template, resulting in letters of varying quality, and apparently much amusement for Strachey. The poetry competition required the entrants, mostly PhD students, to write programs whose output or source code was in some way poetic: the entries displayed remarkable ingenuity. Various analyses of Strachey’s work depict it as a parody of attitudes to love, an artistic endeavour, or as a technical exploration. In this talk I will consider how these apply to the Newcastle competition and add my own interpretations.

The first edition of Thompson’s famous book On Growth and Form appeared in 1917. It has subsequently been regarded as a foundational work in mathematical biology and a revolutionary contribution to the field of morphology. Most existing literature credits Thompson as a lone genius who produced the 793 pages of the 1917 edition and 1116 pages of the 1942 edition. Thompson’s correspondence presents a very different picture of this tome as one arising from extensive and ongoing – perhaps sometimes unwitting? – collaboration.