The trace formula
Abstract
In this talk I will explain the basic motivation behind the trace formula and give some simple examples. I will then discuss how it can be used to prove things about automorphic representations on general reductive groups.
Forthcoming events in this series
In this talk I will explain the basic motivation behind the trace formula and give some simple examples. I will then discuss how it can be used to prove things about automorphic representations on general reductive groups.
A finite set of elements in a connected real Lie group is "Diophantine" if non-identity short words in the set all lie far away from the identity. It has long been understood that in abelian groups, such sets are abundant. In this talk I will discuss recent work of Aka; Breuillard; Rosenzweig and de Saxce concerning this phenomenon (and its limitations) in the more general setting of nilpotent groups.
In 1997 V. Bentkus and F. Götze introduced a technique for estimating $L^p$ norms of certain exponential sums without needing an explicit estimate for the exponential sum itself. One uses instead a kind of estimate I call a "moat lemma". I explain this term, and discuss the implications for several kinds of point-counting problem which we all know and love.
In the first part of the talk we are going to build up some intuition about limit-periodic functions and I will explain why they are the 'simplest' class of arithmetic functions appearing in analytic number theory. In the second part, I will give an equivalent description of 'limit-periodicity' by using exponential sums and explain how this property allows us to solve 'twin-prime'-like problems by the circle method.
This talk will discuss the discovery of Heegner points from a historic perspective. They are a beautiful application of analytic techniques to the study of rational points on elliptic curves, which is now a ubiquitous theme in number theory. We will start with a historical account of elliptic curves in the 60's and 70's, and a correspondence between Birch and Gross, culminating in the Gross-Zagier formula in the 80's. Time permitting, we will discuss certain applications and ramifications of these ideas in modern number theory.
The 'pyjama stripe' is the subset of the plane consisting of a vertical
strip of width epsilon about every integer x-coordinate. The 'pyjama
problem' asks whether finitely many rotations of the pyjama stripe about
the origin can cover the plane.
I'll attempt to outline a solution to this problem. Although not a lot
of this is particularly representative of techniques frequently used in
additive combinatorics, I'll try to flag up whenever this happens -- in
particular ideas about 'limit objects'.
This talk will be a gentle introduction to the main ideas behind some of the obstructions to the Hasse principle. In particular, I'll focus on the Brauer-Manin obstruction and on the descent obstruction, and explain briefly how other types of obstructions could be constructed.
In the 1930's E. Artin conjectured that a form over a p-adic field of degree d has a non-trivial zero whenever n>d^2. In this talk we will discuss this relatively old conjecture, focusing on recent developments concerning quartic and quintic forms.
I will describe how a sieve method can be used to establish the Hasse principle for the variety
$$f(t)=N(x_1,\ldots,x_k),$$
where $f$ is an irreducible cubic and $N$ is a norm form for a number field satisfying certain hypotheses.
Mixed motives turn up in number theory in various guises. Rather than discuss the rather deep foundational questions involved, this talk will aim
to give several illustrations of the ubiquity of mixed motives and their realizations. Along the way I hope to mention some of: the Mordell-Weil
theorem, the theory of height pairings, special values of L-functions, the Mahler measure of a polynomial, Galois deformations and the motivic
fundamental group.
It is well known that one can attach Galois representations to certain modular forms, it is natural to ask how one might generalise this to produce more Galois representations. One such approach, due to Gross, defines objects called algebraic modular forms on certain types of reductive groups and then conjectures the existence of Galois representations attached to them. In this talk I will outline how for a particular choice of reductive group the conjectured Galois representations exist and are the classical modular Galois representations, thus providing some evidence that this is a good generalisation to consider.
We will discuss some geometric methods to study Diophantine equations. We focus on the case of elliptic curves and their natural generalisations: Abelian varieties, Calabi-Yau manifolds and hyperelliptic curves.
We'll present a proof of the basic Burgess bound for short character sums, following the simplified presentation of Gallagher and Montgomery.
A nice bed-time story to end the term. It is often said that ideas like the group law or isogenies on elliptic curves were 'known to Fermat' or are 'found
in Diophantus', but this is rarely properly explained. I will discuss the first work on rational points on curves from the point of view of modern number
theory, asking if it really did anticipate the methods we use today.
Given a form $F(x)$, the circle method is frequently used to provide an asymptotic for the number of representations of a fixed integer $N$ by $F(x)$. However, it can also be used to prove results of a different flavor, such as showing that almost every number (in a certain sense) has at least one representation by $F(x)$. In joint work with Roger Heath-Brown, we have recently considered a 2-dimensional version of such a problem. Given two quadratic forms $Q_1$ and $Q_2$, we ask whether almost every integer (in a certain sense) is simultaneously represented by $Q_1$ and $Q_2$. Under a modest geometric assumption, we are able to prove such a result if the forms are in $5$ variables or more. In particular, we show that any two such quadratic forms must simultaneously attain prime values infinitely often. In this seminar, we will review the circle method, introduce the idea of a Kloosterman refinement, and investigate how such "almost all" results may be proved.
Which positive integers are the area of a right angled triangle with rational sides? In this talk I will discuss this classical problem, its reformulation in terms of rational points on elliptic curves and Tunnell's theorem which gives a complete solution to this problem assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.
This talk will attempt to say something about the p-adic zeta function, a p-adic analytic object which encodes information about Galois cohomology of Tate twists in its special values. We first explain the construction of the p-adic zeta function, via p-adic Fourier theory. Then, after saying something about Coleman integration, we will explain the interpretation of special values of the p-adic zeta function as limiting values of p-adic polylogarithms, in analogy with the Archimedean case. Finally, we will explore the consequences for the de Rham and etale fundamental groupoids of the projective line minus three points.
Vinogradov's three prime theorem resolves the weak Goldbach conjecture for sufficiently large integers. We discuss some of the ideas behind the proof, and discuss some of the obstacles to completing a proof of the odd goldbach conjecture.
In this talk we will give an introduction to the theory of p-adic (or rigid) cohomology. We will first define the theory for smooth affine varieties, then sketch the definition in general, next compute a simple example, and finally discuss some applications.
The infamous inverse Galois problem asks whether or not every finite group can be realised as a Galois group over Q. We will see some techniques that have been developed to attack it, and will soon end up in the realms of class field theory, étale fundamental groups and modular representations. We will give some concrete examples and outline the so called 'rigidity method'.
I will discuss the structure of the Selberg class - in which certain expected properties of Dirichlet series and L-functions are axiomatised - along with the numerous interesting conjectures concerning the Dirichlet series in the Selberg class. Furthermore, results regarding the degree of the elements in the Selberg class shall be explored, culminating in the recent work of Kaczorowski and Perelli in which they prove the absence of elements with degree between one and two.
We consider the prime k-tuples conjecture, which predicts that a system of linear forms are simultaneously prime infinitely often, provided that there are no obvious obstructions. We discuss some motivations for this and some progress towards proving weakened forms of the conjecture.
This talk will begin by recalling classical facts about the relationship between values of the Riemann zeta function at negative integers and the arithmetic of cyclotomic extensions of the rational numbers. We will then consider a generalisation of this theory due to Iwasawa, and along the way we shall define the p-adic Riemann zeta function. Time permitting, I will also say something about what zeta values at positive integers have to do with the fundamental group of the projective line minus three points