Tue, 03 May 2016
14:00
L3

Modelling weakly coupled nonlinear oscillators: volcanism and glacial cycles

Jonathan Burley
(Department of Earth Science, University of Oxford)
Abstract

This talk will be a geophysicist's view on the emerging properties of a numerical model representing the Earth's climate and volcanic activity over the past million years.

The model contains a 2D ice sheet (Glen's Law solved with a semi-implicit scheme), an energy balance for the atmosphere and planet surface (explicit), and an ODE for the time evolution of CO2 (explicit).

The dependencies between these models generate behaviour similar to weakly coupled nonlinear oscillators.

Tue, 03 May 2016

13:00 - 13:30
C5

√T, or not √T, that is the question

Matthew Saxton
(Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford)
Abstract

We consider the motion of a thin liquid drop on a smooth substrate as the drop evaporates into an inert gas. Many experiments suggest that, at times close to the drop’s extinction, the drop radius scales as the square root of the time remaining until extinction. However, other experiments observe slightly different scaling laws. We use the method of matched asymptotic expansions to investigate whether this different behaviour is systematic or an artefact of experiment.

Mon, 02 May 2016
16:00
C3

Explicit Kummer coordinates for higher genus curves

Christopher Nicholls
((Oxford University))
Abstract

I will explain how to find an explicit embedding of the Kummer variety of a higher genus curve into projective space and discuss applications of such an embedding to the study of rational points on Jacobians of curves, as well as the original curves.

Mon, 02 May 2016
16:00
L3

What is the Value of Manuscript Sources and Resources?

Peter M. Neumann
((Oxford University))
Abstract

Part of the series 'What do historians of mathematics do?' 

" Over the last four centuries a huge amount of mathematics has been published.  Most of it has, however, had little or no influence.  By way of contrast, some mathematics, although unpublished in its time, has had great influence.  My hope is to illustrate this with discussion of manuscript sources and resources that have survived from Thomas Harriot (c.1560--1621), Isaac Newton (1642--1727) and Évariste Galois (1811--1832)."

Mon, 02 May 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L4

Square Functions and the Muckenhoupt Weight Classes of Elliptic Measures

Bernd Kirchheim
(Universität Leipzig)
Abstract

We give a new characterization of the property that the elliptic measure
belongs to the infinity weight Muckenhoupt class
in terms of a Carleson measure property of bounded solutions.
This is joint work with C.Kenig, J.Pipher and T.Toro

Mon, 02 May 2016
14:15
L4

Untwisted and twisted open de Rham spaces

Michael Lennox Wong
(Duisburg-Essen University)
Abstract

 An "open de Rham space" refers to a moduli space of meromorphic connections on the projective line with underlying trivial bundle.  In the case where the connections have simple poles, it is well-known that these spaces exhibit hyperkähler metrics and can be realized as quiver varieties.  This story can in fact be extended to the case of higher order poles, at least in the "untwisted" case.  The "twisted" spaces, introduced by Bremer and Sage, refer to those which have normal forms diagonalizable only after passing to a ramified cover.  These spaces often arise as quotients by unipotent groups and in some low-dimensional examples one finds some well-known hyperkähler manifolds, such as the moduli of magnetic monopoles.  This is a report on ongoing work with Tamás Hausel and Dimitri Wyss.

Mon, 02 May 2016

12:00 - 13:00
L3

Another look at the information paradox: Soft black hole hair

Malcolm Perry
(Cambridge)
Abstract

The black hole information paradox comes about because of the classical no-hair theorems for black holes. I will discuss soft black hole hair in electrodynamics and in gravitation. Then some speculations on its relevance to the in formation paradox are presented.

Fri, 29 Apr 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L1

InFoMM CDT Annual Lecture

Professor Chris Budd
(University of Bath)
Abstract

Some models for climate change, the good the bad and the ugly

Modelling climate presents huge challenges for mathematicians and scientists, and has a large effect on policy makers.  Climate models themselves vary from simple to complex with a huge range in between.  But how good and/or reliable are they?

In this talk I will describe some of the various mathematical models of climate that are both used to understand past climate and also to predict future climate.  I will also try to show that an understanding of non-smooth effects in dynamical systems can give us useful insights into the behaviour and analysis of these models.

Fri, 29 Apr 2016
12:00
L6

Prandtl equations in Sobolev Spaces

Tong Yang
(City University of Hong Kong)
Abstract
The classical result of Oleinik and her collaborators in 1960s on the Prandtl equations shows that in two space dimensions, the monotonicity condition on the tangential component of the velocity field in the normal direction yields local in time well-posedness of the system. Recently, the well-posedness of Prandtl equations in Sobolev spaces has also been obtained under the same monotonicity condition. Without this monotonicity condition, it is well expected that boundary separation will be developed. And the work of Gerard-Varet and Dormy gives the ill-posedness, in particular in Sobolev spaces, of the linearized systemaround a shear flow with a non-degenerate critical point under when the boundary layer tends to the Euler flow exponentially in the normal direction. In this talk, we will first show that this exponential decay condition is not necessary and then in some sense it shows that the monotonicity condition is sufficient and necessary for the well-posedness of the Prandtl equations in two space dimensions in Sobolev spaces. Finally, we will discuss the problem in three space dimensions.
Fri, 29 Apr 2016

11:00 - 13:00
C2

Introduction to Beilinson's approach to p-adic Hodge theory

Tamas Szamuely
(Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics)
Abstract

This is an introduction to the article 

A. Beilinson, p-adic periods and derived de Rham cohomology, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), no. 3, 715--738.

 

Thu, 28 Apr 2016
16:00
L6

From Sturm, Sylvester, Witt and Wall to the present day

Andrew Ranicki
(University of Edinburgh)
Abstract

The talk will be based on some of the material in the joint survey with Etienne Ghys

"Signatures in algebra, topology and dynamics"

http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.092582

In the 19th century Sturm's theorem on the number of roots of a real polynomial motivated Sylvester to define the signature of a quadratic form. In the 20th century the classification of quadratic forms over algebraic number fields motivated Witt to introduce the "Witt groups" of stable isomorphism classes of quadratic forms over arbitrary fields. Still in the 20th century the study of high-dimensional topological manifolds with nontrivial fundamental group motivated Wall to introduce the "Wall groups" of stable isomorphism classes of quadratic forms over arbitrary rings with involution. In our survey we interpreted Sturm's theorem in terms of the Witt-Wall groups of function fields. The talk will emphasize the common thread running through this developments, namely the notion of the localization of a ring inverting elements. More recently, the Cohn localization of inverting matrices over a noncommutative ring has been applied to topology in the 21st century, in the context of the speaker's algebraic theory of surgery.

 

Thu, 28 Apr 2016

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Branching diffusion representation of semilinear PDEs and Monte Carlo approximation

Xiaolu Tan
(Paris Dauphine University)
Abstract

We provide a representation result of parabolic semi-linear PDEs, with polynomial nonlinearity, by branching diffusion processes. We extend the classical representation for KPP equations, introduced by Skorokhod (1964), Watanabe (1965) and McKean (1975), by allowing for polynomial nonlinearity in the pair (u,Du), where u is the solution of the PDE with space gradient Du. Similar to the previous literature, our result requires a non-explosion condition which restrict to "small maturity" or "small nonlinearity" of the PDE. Our main ingredient is the automatic differentiation technique as in Henry Labordere, Tan and Touzi (2015), based on the Malliavin integration by parts, which allows to account for the nonlinearities in the gradient. As a consequence, the particles of our branching diffusion are marked by the nature of the nonlinearity. This new representation has very important numerical implications as it is suitable for Monte Carlo simulation.

Thu, 28 Apr 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L3

Mathematics and Molecular Biology: The Engineering Approach

Bob Eisenberg
(Rush University)
Abstract

Life is different because it is inherited. All life comes from a blueprint (genes) that can only make proteins. Proteins are studied by more than one hundred thousand scientists and physicians every day because they are so important in health and disease. The function of proteins is on the macroscopic scale, but atomic details control that function, as is shown in a multitude of experiments. The structure of proteins is so important that governments spend billions studying them. Structures are known in exquisite detail determined by crystallographic measurement of more than 105 different proteins. But the forces that govern the movement and function of proteins are not visible in the structure. Mathematics is needed to compute both function and forces so comparison with experiment can be made. Experiments report numbers, typically sets of numbers in the form of graphs. Verbal models, however beautifully written in the biological tradition, do not provide numerical outputs, and so it is difficult to tell which verbal model better fits data.

The mathematics of molecular biology must be multiscale because atomic details control macroscopic function. The device approach of the engineering and English physiological tradition provides the dimensional reduction needed to solve the multiscale problem. Mathematical analysis of hundreds of experiments (reported in some fifty papers) has been successful in showing how some properties of an important class of proteins—ion channels— work. Ion channels are natural nanovalves as important to animals as Field Effect Transistors (FETs) are to computers. I will present the Fermi Poisson approach started by Jinn Liang Liu. The Fermi distribution is used to describe the saturation of space produced by crowded spherical ions. The Poisson equation (and continuity of current) is used to describe long range electrodynamics. Short range correlations are approximated by the Santangelo equation. A fully consistent mathematical description reproduces macroscopic properties of bulk solutions of sodium and calcium chloride solutions. It also describes several different channels (with quite different atomic detailed structures) quite well in a wide range of conditions using a handful of parameters never changed. It is not clear why the model works as well it does, nor is it clear how well the model will work on other channels, transporters or proteins.

Thu, 28 Apr 2016

14:00 - 15:00
L5

Fast simplicial finite elements via Bernstein polynomials

Professor Rob Kirby
(Baylor University)
Abstract

For many years, sum-factored algorithms for finite elements in rectangular reference geometry have combined low complexity with the mathematical power of high-order approximation.  However, such algorithms rely heavily on the tensor product structure inherent in the geometry and basis functions, and similar algorithms for simplicial geometry have proven elusive.

Bernstein polynomials are totally nonnegative, rotationally symmetric, and geometrically decomposed bases with many other remarkable properties that lead to optimal-complexity algorithms for element wise finite element computations.  The also form natural building blocks for the finite element exterior calculus bases for the de Rham complex so that H(div) and H(curl) bases have efficient representations as well.  We will also their relevance for explicit discontinuous Galerkin methods, where the element mass matrix requires special attention.

Thu, 28 Apr 2016
11:00
C5

"p-adica nova"

Jochen Koenigsmann
(Oxford)
Abstract

This will be a little potpourri containing some of the recent developments on the model theory of F_p((t)) and of algebraic extensions of Q_p.

Wed, 27 Apr 2016

16:00 - 17:00
C1

Random walks, harmonic functions and Poisson boundary

Vigolo Federico
(Oxford)
Abstract

in this talk I will try to introduce some key ideas and concepts about random walks on discrete spaces, with special interest on random walks on Cayley graphs.

Wed, 27 Apr 2016
16:00
C2

A counterexample to the Ho-Zhao problem

Achim Jung
(Birmingham)
Abstract

It is quite easy to see that the sobrification of a
topological space is a dcpo with respect to its specialisation order
and that the topology is contained in the Scott topology wrt this
order. It is also known that many classes of dcpo's are sober when
considered as topological spaces via their Scott topology. In 1982,
Peter Johnstone showed that, however, not every dcpo has this
property in a delightful short note entitled "Scott is not always
sober".

Weng Kin Ho and Dongsheng Zhao observed in the early 2000s that the
Scott topology of the sobrification of a dcpo is typically different
from the Scott topology of the original dcpo, and they wondered
whether there is a way to recover the original dcpo from its
sobrification. They showed that for large classes of dcpos this is
possible but were not able to establish it for all of them. The
question became known as the Ho-Zhao Problem. In a recent
collaboration, Ho, Xiaoyong Xi, and I were able to construct a
counterexample.

In this talk I want to present the positive results that we have about
the Ho-Zhao problem as well as our counterexample. 

Wed, 27 Apr 2016

12:15 - 13:15
L4

From maximal to minimal supersymmetry in string loop amplitudes

Dr Marcus Berg
(Karlstadt University)
Abstract
I will summarize recent (arXiv:1603.05262) and upcoming work with Igor Buchberger and Oliver Schlotterer. We construct a map from n-point 1-loop string amplitudes in maximal supersymmetry to n-3-point 1-loop amplitudes in minimal supersymmetry. I will outline a few implications for the quantum string effective action.