Author
Paseau, A
Journal title
Philosophia Mathematica
DOI
10.1093/philmat/nkl017
Issue
1
Volume
15
Last updated
2025-04-09T10:41:58.633+01:00
Page
30-53
Abstract
George Boolos has argued that the iterative conception of set justifies most, but not all, the ZFC axioms, and that a second conception of set, the Frege-von Neumann conception (FN), justifies the remaining axioms. This article challenges Boolos's claim that FN does better than the iterative conception at justifying the axioms in question. © 2007 Oxford University Press.
Symplectic ID
148311
Favourite
Off
Publication type
Journal Article
Publication date
01 Feb 2007
Please contact us with feedback and comments about this page.