Abstraction Reconceived

Author: 

Studd, J

Publication Date: 

1 July 2016

Journal: 

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Last Updated: 

2019-08-13T08:25:46.57+01:00

Issue: 

2

Volume: 

67

DOI: 

10.1093/bjps/axu035

page: 

579-615

abstract: 

© 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.Neologicists have sought to ground mathematical knowledge in abstraction. One especially obstinate problem for this account is the bad company problem. The leading neologicist strategy for resolving this problem is to attempt to sift the good abstraction principles from the bad. This response faces a dilemma: the system of 'good' abstraction principles either falls foul of the Scylla of inconsistency or the Charybdis of being unable to recover a modest portion of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with its intended generality. This article argues that the bad company problem is due to the 'static' character of abstraction on the neologicist's account and develops a 'dynamic' account of abstraction that avoids both horns of the dilemma.

Symplectic id: 

629525

Submitted to ORA: 

Not Submitted

Publication Type: 

Journal Article