Fri, 04 Nov 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L1

North meets South Colloquium

Emilie Dufresne + Robert Van Gorder
(Mathematical Institute, Oxford)
Abstract

What is the minimal size of a separating set? -- Emilie Dufresne

[[{"fid":"23334","view_mode":"media_square","fields":{"format":"media_square","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"Emilie Dufresne","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":"Emilie Dufresne"},"type":"media","attributes":{"alt":"Emilie Dufresne","title":"Emilie Dufresne","height":"258","width":"258","class":"media-element file-media-square"}}]]

Abstract: The problem of classifying objects up to certain allowed transformations figures prominently in almost all branches of Mathematics, and Invariants are used to decide if two objects are equivalent. A separating set is a set of invariants which achieve the desired classification. In this talk we take the point of view of Invariant Theory, where the objects correspond to points on an affine variety (often a vector space) and equivalence is given by the action of an algebraic group on this affine variety. We explain how the geometry and combinatorics of the group action govern the minimal size of separating sets.

 

Predator-Prey-Subsidy Dynamics and the Paradox of Enrichment on Networks -- Robert Van Gorder

[[{"fid":"23335","view_mode":"media_square","fields":{"format":"media_square","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"Robert Van Gorder","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":"Robert Van Gorder"},"type":"media","attributes":{"alt":"Robert Van Gorder","title":"Robert Van Gorder","height":"258","width":"258","class":"media-element file-media-square"}}]]

Abstract: The phrase "paradox of enrichment" was coined by Rosenzweig (1971) to describe the observation that increasing the food available to prey participating in predator-prey interactions can destabilize the predator's population. Subsequent work demonstrated that food-web connectance on networks can stabilize the predator-prey dynamics, thereby dampening the paradox of enrichment in networked domains (such as those used in stepping-stone models). However, when a resource subsidy is available to predators which migrate between nodes on such a network (as is actually observed in some real systems), we may show that predator-prey systems can exhibit a paradox of enrichment - induced by the motion of predators between nodes - provided that such networks are sufficiently densely connected. 

Fri, 28 Oct 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L1

A short guide to research impact

Professor Mike Giles & Professor Ursula Martin
(Mathematical Institute, Oxford)
Abstract

Some relish the idea of working with users of research and having an impact on the outside world - some view it as a ridiculous government agenda which interferes with academic freedom.  We’ll give an overview of  the political and practical aspects of impact and identify things you might want to consider when deciding whether, and how, to get involved.

Fri, 21 Oct 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L1

Talking to your audience

Professor Jon Chapman
(Mathematical Institute, Oxford)
Abstract

How might you prepare talks for different audiences (specialised seminar, colloquium-style talk, talk to a non-mathematical audience, job interview)?  Join us for advice on this, and on how to connect with your audience and get them to feel involved.

Fri, 14 Oct 2016

16:00 - 17:00
L2

Engaging with the public

Abstract

There are many opportunities within Oxford to communicate your excitement about mathematics and your own research to a wider audience, whether adults or school students.  In this session we'll hear about some of those opportunities, and have some training on how to write a press release, so that you are well placed to share your next research paper with the public.

Featuring 
Rebecca Cotton-Barratt, Schools Liaison Officer and Admissions Coordinator in the Mathematical Institute
Mareli Grady, Schools Liaison Officer in the Statistics Department and Mathemagicians Coordinator in the Mathematical Institute
Stuart Gillespie, Media Relations Officer for the University of Oxford

Across the physical and biological sciences, mathematical models are formulated to capture experimental observations. Often, multiple models are developed to explore alternate hypotheses.  It then becomes necessary to choose between different models.

Tue, 08 Nov 2016

15:45 - 16:45
L4

Towards a compactification of the moduli space of K3 surfaces of degree 2

Alan Thompson
(Warwick)
Abstract

Ever since moduli spaces of polarised K3 surfaces were constructed in the 1980's, people have wondered about the question of compactification: can one make the moduli space of K3 surfaces compact by adding in some boundary components in a "nice" way? Ideally, one hopes to find a compactification that is both explicit and geometric (in the sense that the boundary components provide moduli for degenerate K3's). I will present on joint work in progress with V. Alexeev, which aims to solve the compactification problem for the moduli space of K3 surfaces of degree 2.

The Clinical Sciences Centre based at Imperial College in London has launched a new initiative to celebrate women in maths and computing. As a new branch of the existing Suffrage Science scheme, it will encourage women into science, and to reach senior leadership roles.

Mon, 10 Oct 2016
14:15
L4

Ricci Solitons

Andrew Dancer
(Oxford)
Abstract

We review the concept of solitons in the Ricci flow, and describe various methods for generating examples, including some where the equations

may be solved in closed form

Thu, 01 Dec 2016
17:30
L6

Pfaffian functions and elliptic functions

Gareth Jones
(Manchester)
Abstract

After giving some motivation, I will discuss work in progress with Harry Schmidt in which we give a pfaffian definition of Weierstrass elliptic functions, refining a result due to Macintyre. The complexity of our definition is bounded by an effective absolute constant. As an application we give an effective version of a result of Corvaja, Masser and Zannier on a sharpening of Manin-Mumford for non-split extensions of elliptic curves by the additive group. We also give a higher dimensional version of their result.

Subscribe to