Torsion homology growth of polynomially growing free-by-cyclic groups
Andrew, N Hughes, S Kudlinska, M Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics volume 54 issue 4 933-941 (25 Aug 2024)
Free-by-cyclic groups, automorphisms and actions on nearly canonical trees
Andrew, N Martino, A Journal of Algebra volume 604 451-495 (01 Aug 2022)
A Bass-Serre theoretic proof of a theorem of Romanovskii and Burns
Andrew, N Communications in Algebra volume 51 issue 5 2004-2013 (08 Dec 2022)
Identifying psychiatric diagnosis from missing mood data through the use of log-signature features
Wu, Y Goodwin, G Lyons, T Saunders, K PLoS ONE volume 17 issue 11 (17 Nov 2022)
Fri, 10 Feb 2023
16:00
L1

Departmental Colloquium

Dani Smith Bassett
(University of Pennsylvania)
Further Information

Title: “Mathematical models of curiosity”

Prof. Bassett is the J. Peter Skirkanich Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, with appointments in the Departments of Bioengineering, Electrical & Systems Engineering, Physics & Astronomy, Neurology, and Psychiatry. They are also an external professor of the Santa Fe Institute. Bassett is most well-known for blending neural and systems engineering to identify fundamental mechanisms of cognition and disease in human brain networks.

Abstract

What is curiosity? Is it an emotion? A behavior? A cognitive process? Curiosity seems to be an abstract concept—like love, perhaps, or justice—far from the realm of those bits of nature that mathematics can possibly address. However, contrary to intuition, it turns out that the leading theories of curiosity are surprisingly amenable to formalization in the mathematics of network science. In this talk, I will unpack some of those theories, and show how they can be formalized in the mathematics of networks. Then, I will describe relevant data from human behavior and linguistic corpora, and ask which theories that data supports. Throughout, I will make a case for the position that individual and collective curiosity are both network building processes, providing a connective counterpoint to the common acquisitional account of curiosity in humans.

Subscribe to