The notion of a superconformal structure on a supermanifold goes back some forty years. I will discuss some recent work that shows how these structures and their deformations govern supersymmetric and superconformal field theories in geometric fashion. A superconformal structure equips a supermanifold with a sheaf of dg commutative algebras; the tangent sheaf of this dg ringed space reproduces the Weyl multiplet of conformal supergravity (equivalently, the superconformal stress tensor multiplet), in any dimension and with any amount of supersymmetry. This construction is uniform under twists, and thus provides a classification of relations between superconformal theories, chiral algebras, higher Virasoro algebras, and more exotic examples.
 

Property (T) (respectively aTmenability) is equivalent to admitting only a trivial action (respectively, a proper action) on a median space, and is also equivalent to admitting only a trivial action (respectively, a proper action) on a Hilbert space (so some L2). For p>2 I will investigate an analogous equivalent characterisation.

The mapping class group a solid handlebody of genus g sits between mapping class groups of surfaces and Out(F_n), in the sense there is an injective map to the mapping class group of the boundary and a surjective map to Out(F_g) via the action on the fundamental group. Similar behaviour happens with actions on associated spaces, such curve complexes and Teichmuller space. I’ll give an expository talk on this, partly in the context of our proof with Petersen that handlebody groups are virtual duality groups, and partly in the context of a problem list on handlebody groups written with Andrew, Hensel, and Hughes.