More than seventy years after its publication, Turing’s article “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis” is still able to surprise its reader, in particular for the power and the depth of its vision. If we know from his biographer, Andrew Hodges, that Turing became interested in embryology and morphogenesis because he wanted to build or, better, to grow a brain, many questions still arise for the reader of the original article: why did Turing – a mathematician, a logician, a cryptographer, one of the fathers of computer science – not use any informational metaphor associated with the notion of “genetic program” in his work on morphogenesis, preferring instead to develop a modelling approach based on a system of partial differential equations ? Where did he draw his modelling inspiration from, both from the point of view of the mathematics and from the point of view of references to biology ? In my presentation I will address these questions by highlighting the morphological connotations of Turing’s work in biology, that can be related to Turing’s interest, in D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson’s classic On Growth and Form (1917). The 1952 article is rather sparse in indications in this regard, which are, however, provided by Turing’s other writings, unpublished during his lifetime, in which he situates his work in continuity with Thompson’s morphological questions. I will also suggest that, as in a virtuous circle, Turing masterfully brings to life a synergy between a morphological look at the living (that implies that his work has a connotation in theoretical biology) and a mathematical exploration of the non-linear, helped by an appropriate and meaningful use of numerical calculus.