16:00
Counting solutions to (some) homogeneous quadratic forms in eight prime variables
Abstract
16:00
On the largest $k$-product-free subsets of the Alternating Groups
Abstract
A subset $A$ of $A_n$ is $k$-product-free if for all $a_1,a_2,\dots,a_k\in A$, $a_1a_2\dots a_k$ $\notin A$.
We determine the largest $3$-product-free and $4$-product-free subsets of $A_n$ for sufficiently large $n$. We also obtain strong stability results and results on multiple sets with forbidden cross products. The principal technical ingredient in our approach is the theory of hypercontractivity in $S_n$. Joint work with Peter Keevash.
16:00
Large values of Dirichlet polynomials with characters
Abstract
Dirichlet polynomials are useful in the study of the Riemann zeta function & Dirichlet L functions, serving as approximations to them via the approximate functional equation. Understanding how often they can be large gives bounds on the number of zeroes of these functions in vertical strips - known as zero density estimates - which are relevant to the distribution of primes in short intervals. Based on Guth-Maynard, we study large values of Dirichlet polynomials with characters, relevant to Dirichlet L functions. Joint work with Yung Chi Li.
16:00
On derived deformations of Galois representations (after Galatius-Venkatesh)
Abstract
Given a mod $p$ Galois representation, one often wonders whether it arises by reducing a $p$-adic one, and whether these lifts are suitably 'well-behaved'. In this talk, we discuss how ideas from homotopy theory aid the study of Galois deformations, reviewing work of Galatius-Venkatesh.
16:00
The moduli space of Bohr sets in R^n
Abstract
The arithmetic regularity lemma says that any dense set A in F_p^n can be cut along cosets of some small codimension subspace H <= F_p^n such that on almost all cosets of H, A is either random or structured (in a precise quantitative manner). A standard example shows that one cannot hope to improve "almost all" to "all", nor to have a good quantitative dependency between the constants involved. Adding a further combinatorial assumption on A to the arithmetic regularity lemma makes its conclusion so strong that one can essentially classify such sets A. In this talk, I will use use the analogous problem with F_p^n replaced with R^n as a way the motivate the funny title.