Following Grothendieck, periods can be interpreted as numbers arising as coefficients of a comparison isomorphism between two cohomology theories. Due to the influence of the “yoga of motives” these numbers are omnipresent in arithmetic algebraic geometry. The first part of the talk will be a crash course on how to study periods, as well as the action of the motivic Galois group on them, via an elementary category of realizations. In the second part, we will see how one uses this framework to study Feynman integrals -- an interesting family of periods arising in quantum field theory. We will finish with a brief overview of some of the recent work in algebraic geometry inspired by the study of periods arising in physics.

We will show that minimally supersymmetric SU(N+2) SQCD models in the middle of the conformal window can be engineered by compactifying certain 6d SCFTs on three punctured spheres. The geometric construction of the 4d theories predicts numerous interesting strong coupling effects, such as IR symmetry enhancements and duality. We will discuss this interplay between simple geometric and group theoretic considerations and complicated field theoretic strong coupling phenomena. For example, one of the dualities arising geometrically from different pair-of-pants decompositions of a four punctured sphere  is an $SU(N+2)$ generalization of the Intriligator-Pouliot duality of $SU(2)$ SQCD with $N_f=4$, which is a degenerate, $N=0$, instance of our discussion.