We present two ways of obtaining hypercontractive inequalities for low-degree functions on compact Lie groups: one based on Ricci curvature bounds, the Bakry-Emery criterion and the representation theory of compact Lie groups, and another based on a (very different) probabilistic coupling approach. As applications we make progress on a question of Gowers concerning product-free subsets of the special unitary groups, and we also obtain 'mixing' inequalities for the special unitary groups, the special orthogonal groups, the spin groups and the compact symplectic groups. We expect that the latter inequalities will have applications in physics.

Based on joint work with Guy Kindler (HUJI), Noam Lifshitz (HUJI) and Dor Minzer (MIT).

The triangle removal lemma of Ruzsa and Szemerédi is a fundamental result in extremal graph theory; very roughly speaking, it says that if a graph is "far" from triangle-free, then it contains "many" triangles. Despite decades of research, there is still a lot that we don't understand about this simple statement; for example, our understanding of the quantitative dependencies is very poor.

In this talk, I will discuss asymmetric versions of the triangle removal lemma, where in some cases we can get almost optimal quantitative bounds. The proofs use a mix of ideas coming from graph theory, number theory, probabilistic combinatorics, and Ramsey theory.

Based on joint work with Lior Gishboliner and Asaf Shapira.

We consider a bond percolation on the hypercube in the supercritical regime. We derive vertex-expansion properties of the giant component. As a consequence we obtain upper bounds on the diameter of the giant component and the mixing time of the lazy random walk on the giant component. This talk is based on joint work with Joshua Erde and Michael Krivelevich.

What is curiosity? Is it an emotion? A behavior? A cognitive process? Curiosity seems to be an abstract concept—like love, perhaps, or justice—far from the realm of those bits of nature that mathematics can possibly address. However, contrary to intuition, it turns out that the leading theories of curiosity are surprisingly amenable to formalization in the mathematics of network science. In this talk, I will unpack some of those theories, and show how they can be formalized in the mathematics of networks. Then, I will describe relevant data from human behavior and linguistic corpora, and ask which theories that data supports. Throughout, I will make a case for the position that individual and collective curiosity are both network building processes, providing a connective counterpoint to the common acquisitional account of curiosity in humans.

We will discuss the pros and cons of targets vs quotas in increasing diversity in Mathematics.