Fri, 05 Feb 2016

14:00 - 15:00
L3

Qualitative behaviour of stochastic and deterministic models of biochemical reaction networks

Professor David Anderson
(Department of Mathematics Wisconsin University)
Abstract

If the abundances of the constituent molecules of a biochemical reaction system  are sufficiently high then their concentrations are typically modelled by a coupled set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs).  If, however, the abundances are low then the standard deterministic models do not provide a good representation of the behaviour of the system and stochastic models are used.  In this talk, I will first introduce both the stochastic and deterministic models.  I will then provide theorems that allow us to determine the qualitative behaviour of the underlying mathematical models from easily checked properties of the associated reaction network.  I will present results pertaining to so-called ``complex-balanced'' models and those satisfying ``absolute concentration robustness'' (ACR).  In particular, I will show how  ACR models, which are stable when modelled deterministically, necessarily undergo an extinction event in the stochastic setting.  I will then characterise the behaviour of these models prior to extinction.

Tue, 19 Jan 2016

15:45 - 16:45
L4

Symplectic categories in Derived Geometry

Lino Amorim
(Oxford)
Abstract

I will describe a construction of the Weinstein symplectic category of Lagrangian correspondences in the context of shifted symplectic geometry. I will then explain how one can linearize this category starting from a "quantization" of  (-1)-shifted symplectic derived stacks: we assign a perverse sheaf to each (-1)-shifted symplectic derived stack (already done by Joyce and his collaborators) and a map of perverse sheaves to each (-1)-shifted Lagrangian correspondence (still conjectural).

Mon, 18 Jan 2016
15:45
L6

Tight contact structures on connected sums need not be contact connected sums

Chris Wendl
(University College London)
Abstract

In dimension three, convex surface theory implies that every tight contact structure on a connected sum M # N can be constructed as a connected sum of tight contact structures on M and N. I will explain some examples showing that this is not true in any dimension greater than three.  The proof is based on a recent higher-dimensional version of a classic result of Eliashberg about the symplectic fillings of contact manifolds obtained by subcritical surgery. This is joint work with Paolo Ghiggini and Klaus Niederkrüger.

Subscribe to