A homogeneous space G/H is called a reductive symmetric space if G is a (real) reductive Lie group, and H is a symmetric subgroup of G, meaning that H is the subgroup fixed by some involution on G. The representation theory on reductive symmetric spaces was studied in depth in the 1990s by Erik van den Ban, Patrick Delorme, and Henrik Schlichtkrull, among many others. In particular, they obtained the Plancherel formula for the L^2 space of G/H. An important aspect is that this generalizes the group case, obtained by Harish-Chandra, which corresponds to the case when G = G' x G' and H is the diagonal subgroup.

In our collaborative efforts with A. Afgoustidis, N. Higson, P. Hochs, Y. Song, we are studying this subject from the perspective of noncommutative geometry. I will describe this exciting new development, with a particular emphasis on describing what is new and how this is different from the traditional group case, i.e. the reduced group C*-algebra of G.

In 1989, Mazur defined the deformation functor associated to a residual Galois representation, which played an important role in the proof by Wiles of the modularity theorem. This was used as a basis over which many mathematicians constructed variations both to further specify it or to expand the contexts where it can be applied. These variations proved to be powerful tools to obtain many strong theorems, in particular of modular nature. In this talk I will give an overview of the deformation theory of Galois representations and describe two variants of Mazur's functor that allow one to properly deform reducible residual representations (which is one of the shortcomings of Mazur's original functor). Namely, I will present the theory of determinant-laws initiated by Bellaïche-Chenevier on the one hand, and an idea developed by Calegari-Emerton on the other.
If time permits, I will also describe results that seem to indicate a possible comparison between the two seemingly unrelated constructions.