Coherence for elementary amenable groups
Hughes, S Kielak, D Kropholler, P Leary, I Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Thu, 23 Feb 2023
17:00
L3

On the shatter functions of semilinear families

Chieu-Minh Tran
(National University of Singapore)
Abstract

Toward a characterization of modularity using shatter functions, we show that an o-minimal expansion of the  real ordered additive group $(\mathbb{R}; 0, +,<)$ does not define restricted multiplication if and only if the shatter function of every definable family is asymptotic to a polynomial. Our result implies that vc-density can only take integer values in $(\mathbb{R}; 0, +,<)$ confirming a special case of a conjecture by Chernikov. (Joint with Abdul Basit.)

Volatility forecasting with machine learning and intraday commonality
Zhang, C Zhang, Y Cucuringu, M Qian, Z Journal of Financial Econometrics volume 22 issue 2 492-530 (20 Mar 2023)
MLMC techniques for discontinuous functions
Giles, M Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods: MCQMC 2022, Linz, Austria, July 17–22 33-47 (13 Jul 2024)
Pure pairs. IV. Trees in bipartite graphs
Scott, A Seymour, P Spirkl, S Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B volume 161 120-146 (01 Mar 2023)
Thu, 25 May 2023

14:00 - 15:00
Lecture Room 3

Balancing Inexactness in Matrix Computations

Erin Carson
(Charles University)
Abstract


On supercomputers that exist today, achieving even close to the peak performance is incredibly difficult if not impossible for many applications. Techniques designed to improve the performance of matrix computations - making computations less expensive by reorganizing an algorithm, making intentional approximations, and using lower precision - all introduce what we can generally call ``inexactness''. The questions to ask are then:

1. With all these various sources of inexactness involved, does a given algorithm still get close enough to the right answer?
2. Given a user constraint on required accuracy, how can we best exploit and balance different types of inexactness to improve performance?

Studying the combination of different sources of inexactness can thus reveal not only limitations, but also new opportunities for developing algorithms for matrix computations that are both fast and provably accurate. We present few recent results toward this goal, icluding mixed precision randomized decompositions and mixed precision sparse approximate inverse preconditioners.

CMS Monte Carlo production in the WLCG computing grid
Hernández, J Kreuzer, P Mohapatra, A De Filippis, N De Weirdt, S Hof, C Wakefield, S Guan, W Khomitch, A Fanfani, A Evans, D Flossdorf, A Maes, J Van Mulders, P Villella, I Pompili, A My, S Abbrescia, M Maggi, G Donvito, G Caballero, J Sanches, J Kavka, C Van Lingen, F Bacchi, W Codispoti, G Elmer, P Eulisse, G Lazaridis, C Kalini, S Sarkar, S Hammad, G Journal of Physics: Conference Series volume 119 issue 5 (01 Jul 2008)
Real-time dataflow and workflow with the CMS tracker data
De Filippis, N Bagliesi, G Bainbridge, R Boccali, T Ciulli, V Giordano, D Hufnagel, D Mason, D Mirabito, L Noeding, C Palla, F Piedra, J Sarkar, S Journal of Physics: Conference Series volume 119 issue 7 (01 Jul 2008)
CMS analysis operations
Andreeva, J Calloni, M Colling, D Fanzago, F D'Hondt, J Klem, J Maier, G Letts, J Maes, J Padhi, S Sarkar, S Spiga, D Van Mulders, P Villella, I Journal of Physics: Conference Series volume 219 issue 1 PART 7 (01 Jan 2010)
The CDF Analysis Farm
Casarsa, M Hsu, S Lipeles, E Neubauer, M Sarkar, S Sfiligoi, I Würthwein, F AIP Conference Proceedings volume 794 275-278 (12 Oct 2005)
Subscribe to