Tue, 22 Jan 2019

14:00 - 14:30
L5

Halley and Newton are one step apart

Trond Steihaug
(Bergen)
Abstract

In this talk, we consider solving nonlinear systems of equations and the unconstrained minimization problem using Newton’s method methods from the Halley class. The methods in this class have in general local and third order rate of convergence while Newton’s method has quadratic convergence. In the unconstrained optimization case, the Halley methods will require the second and third derivative. Third-order methods will, in most cases, use fewer iterations than a second-order method to reach the same accuracy. However, the number of arithmetic operations per iteration is higher for third-order methods than for a second-order method. We will demonstrate that for a large class of problems, the ratio of the number of arithmetic operations of Halley’s method and Newton’s method is constant per iteration (independent of the number of unknowns).

We say that the sparsity pattern of the third derivative (or tensor) is induced by the sparsity pattern of the Hessian matrix. We will discuss some datastructures for matrices where the indices of nonzero elements of the tensor can be computed. Historical notes will be merged into the talk.

Fri, 11 Jan 2019

09:30 - 17:00
L3

SIAM UKIE Annual Meeting 2019

Various
(University of Cambridge and others)
Abstract

The 23rd Annual Meeting of the SIAM UKIE Section will take place on Friday 11th January 2019 at the Mathematical Institute at the University of Oxford.

The meeting will feature five invited speakers covering a broad range of industrial and applied mathematics: 

- Lisa Fauci, Tulane University, Incoming SIAM President
- Des Higham, Strathclyde University 
- Carola-Bibiane Schoenlieb (IMA sponsored speaker), University of Cambridge 
- Kirk Soodhalter, Trinity College Dublin 
- Konstantinos Zygalakis, University of Edinburgh 

There will also be a poster session, open to PhD students and postdocs. Travel support will be available for PhD students with an accepted poster presentation, and Best Poster prizes will be awarded. 

All talks will take place in room L3 in the Andrew Wiles Building (Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford). 

Programme 
09:30 - 10:00 Registration, tea/coffee 
10:00 - 10:15 Welcome 
10:15 - 11:00 Des Higham: Our Friends are Cooler than Us 
11:00 - 11:45 Lisa Fauci: Complex dynamics of fibers in flow at the microscale 
11:45 - 12:15 Poster Blitz 
12:15 - 13:30 Lunch and Poster session 
13:30 - 14:00 SIAM UKIE Business Meeting, open to all 
14:00 - 14:45 Kirk Soodhalter: Augmented Arnoldi-Tikhonov Methods for Ill-posed Problems 
14:45 - 15:30 Konstantinos Zygalakis: Explicit stabilised Runge-Kutta methods and their application to Bayesian inverse problems 
15:30 - 16:00 Tea/coffee 
16:00 - 16:45 Carola-Bibiane Schoenlieb (IMA sponsored speaker): Variational models and partial differential equations for mathematical imaging 
16:45 - 17:00 Poster prize announcement

Thu, 07 Mar 2019
17:00
L5

Proving Lower Bounds on the Sizes of Proofs and Computations

Rahul Santhanam
(Oxford)
Abstract

The well known (and notoriously hard) P vs NP problem asks whether every Boolean function with polynomial-size proofs is also computable in
polynomial time.

The standard approach to the P vs NP problem is via circuit complexity. For progressively richer classes of Boolean circuits (networks of AND, OR and NOT
logic gates), one wishes to show super-polynomial lower bounds on the sizes of circuits (as a function of the size of the input) computing some Boolean
function known to be in NP, such as the Satisfiability problem.

However, there is a more logic-oriented approach initiated by Cook and Reckhow, going through proof complexity rather than circuit complexity. For
progressively richer proof systems, one wishes to show super-polynomial lower bounds on the sizes of proofs (as a function of the size of the tautology) of
some sequence of propositional tautologies.

I will give a brief overview on known results along these two directions, and on their limitations. Somewhat surprisingly, similar techniques have been found
to be useful for these seemingly different approaches. I will say something about known connections between the approaches, and pose the question of
whether there are deeper connections.

Finally, I will discuss how the perspective of proof complexity can be used to formalize the difficulty of proving lower bounds on the sizes of computations
(or of proofs).

 

When mathematicians solve a differential equation, they are usually converting unbounded operators (such as differentiation) which are represented in the equation into bounded operators (such as integration) which represent the solutions.  It is rarely possible to give a solution explicitly, but general theory can often show whether a solution exists, whether it is unique, and what properties it has.  For this, one often needs to apply suitable (bounded) functions $f$ to unbounded operators $A$ and obtain bounded operators $f(A)$ with good properties.&

Fri, 08 Mar 2019

14:00 - 15:00
C2

Generation of large-scale flows in mixed turbulent and stably stratified fluids

Louis Couston
(British Antarctic Survey)
Abstract

Energy transfers from small-scale turbulence and waves to large-scale flows are ubiquituous in oceans, atmospheres, planetary cores and stars.

Therefore, turbulence and waves have a direct effect on the large-scale organization of geophysical and astrophysical fluids and can affect their long-term dynamics.

In this talk I will discuss recent direct numerical simulation (DNS) results of two upscale energy transfer mechanisms that emerge from the dynamics of a fluid that is self-organized in a turbulent layer next to a stably-stratified one. This self-organization in an adjacent "two-layer" turbulent-stratified system is ubiquituous in nature and is representative of e.g. Earth's troposphere-stratosphere system, the oceans' surface mixed layer-thermocline system, and stars' convective-radiative interiors. The first set of DNS results will demonstrate how turbulent motions can generate internal waves, which then force a slowly-reversing large-scale flow, akin to Earth's Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). The second set of DNS results will show how the stratified layer regulates the emergence of large-scale vortices (LSV) in the turbulent layer under rapid rotation in the regime known as geostrophic turbulence. I will demonstrate why it is important to resolve both the turbulence and the waves, as otherwise the natural variability of the QBO is lost and LSV cannot form. I will discuss future works and highlight how the results may guide the implementation of upscale energy transfers in global earth system models.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
C2

The viscosities of partially molten materials undergoing diffusion creep

John Rudge
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract

Partially molten materials resist shearing and compaction. This resistance

is described by a fourth-rank effective viscosity tensor. When the tensor

is isotropic, two scalars determine the resistance: an effective shear and

an effective bulk viscosity. In this seminar, calculations are presented of

the effective viscosity tensor during diffusion creep for a 3D tessellation of

tetrakaidecahedrons (truncated octahedrons). The geometry of the melt is

determined by assuming textural equilibrium.  Two parameters

control the effect of melt on the viscosity tensor: the porosity and the

dihedral angle. Calculations for both Nabarro-Herring (volume diffusion)

and Coble (surface diffusion) creep are presented. For Nabarro-Herring

creep the bulk viscosity becomes singular as the porosity vanishes. This

singularity is logarithmic, a weaker singularity than typically assumed in

geodynamic models. The presence of a small amount of melt (0.1% porosity)

causes the effective shear viscosity to approximately halve. For Coble creep,

previous modelling work has argued that a very small amount of melt may

lead to a substantial, factor of 5, drop in the shear viscosity. Here, a

much smaller, factor of 1.4, drop is obtained.

Fri, 08 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
C2

The mechanism of formation of grounding zone wedges in three dynamical regimes

Katarzyna Kowal
(DAMTP University of Cambridge)
Abstract

Ice streams are fast flowing regions of ice that generally slide over a layer of unconsolidated, water-saturated subglacial sediment known as till.  A striking feature that has been observed geophysically is that subglacial till has been found to accumulate distinctively into sedimentary wedges at the grounding zones (regions where ice sheets begin to detach from the bedrock to form freely floating ice shelves) of both past and present-day ice sheets. These grounding-zone wedges have important implications for ice-sheet stability against grounding zone retreat in response to rising sea levels, and their origins have remained a long-standing question. Using a combination of mathematical modelling, a series of laboratory experiments, field data and numerical simulations, we develop a fluid-mechanical model that explains the mechanism of the formation of these sedimentary wedges in terms of the loading and unloading of deformable till in three dynamical regimes. We also undertake a series of analogue laboratory experiments, which reveal that a similar wedge of underlying fluid accumulates spontaneously in experimental grounding zones, we formulate local conditions relating wedge slopes in each of the scenarios and compare them to available geophysical radargram data at the well lubricated, fast-flowing Whillans Ice Stream.

Thu, 07 Mar 2019

13:00 - 14:00
L4

Optimal execution with rough path signatures

Imanol Perez
(Oxford University)
Further Information


 

Abstract

We consider a well-studied optimal execution problem under little assumptions on the underlying midprice process. We do so by using signatures from rough path theory, that allows converting the original problem into a more computationally tractable problem. We include a few numerical experiments where we show that our methodology is able to retrieve the theoretical optimal execution speed for several problems studied in the literature, as well as some cases not included in the literatture. We also study some estensions of our framework to other settings.
 

Thu, 14 Feb 2019

13:00 - 14:00
L4

Pathwise functional portfolio generation and optimal transport

Micheal Monoyios
(Oxford University)
Further Information

We make precise a remarkable connection, first observed by Pal and Wong (2016) and further analysed in the doctoral thesis of Vervuurt (2016), between functionally generated investments and optimal transport, in a model-free discrete-time financial market. A functionally generated portfolio (FGP) computes the investment in each stock through the prism of the super-differential of the logarithm of a concave function (the generating function of the FGP) of the market weight vector. Such portfolios have been shown to outperform the market under suitable conditions. Here, in our pathwise discrete-time scenario, we equate the convex-analytic cyclical monotonicity property characterising super-differentials, with a $c$-cyclical monotonicity property of the unique Monge solution of an appropriately constructed optimal transport problem with cost function $c$, which transfers the market portfolio distribution to the FGP distribution. Using the super-differential characterisation of functional investments, we construct optimal transport problems for both traditional (multiplicative) FGPs, and an ``additive'' modification introduced by Karatzas and Ruf (2017), featuring the same cost function in both cases, which characterise the functional investment. In the multiplicative case, the construction differs from Pal and Wong (2016) and Vervuurt (2016), who used a ``multiplicative'' cyclical monotonicity property, as opposed to the classical cyclical monotonicity property used here.
  
We establish uniqueness of the solution to the relevant optimal transport problem, elevating the connection observed by Pal and Wong (2016) to an exact equivalence between optimal transport and functional generation. We explore ramifications, including pathwise discrete-time master equations for the evolution of the relative wealth of the investment when using the market portfolio as numeraire. We take the pathwise continuous time limit, assuming continuous paths which admit well-defined quadratic variation, to establish model-free continuous-time master equations for both types of functionally generated investment, providing an alternative derivation to the recent proof of Schied et al (2018) of the master equation for multiplicative FGPs, as well as an extension to the case of additive functionally generated trading strategies.

Fri, 01 Mar 2019
16:00
L1

Maths meets Computer Vision

Further Information

Speaker 1: Pawan Kumar
Title: Neural Network Verification
Abstract: In recent years, deep neural networks have started to find their way into safety critical application domains such as autonomous cars and personalised medicine. As the risk of an error in such applications is very high, a key step in the deployment of neural networks is their formal verification: proving that a network satisfies a desirable property, or providing a counter-example to show that it does not. In this talk, I will formulate neural network verification as an optimization problem, briefly present the existing branch-and-bound style algorithms to compute a globally optimal solution, and highlight the outstanding mathematical challenges that limit the size of problems we can currently solve.

Speaker 2: Samuel Albanie
Title: The Design of Deep Neural Network Architectures: Exploration in a High-Dimensional Search Space
Abstract: Deep Neural Networks now represent the dominant family of function approximators for tackling machine perception tasks. In this talk, I will discuss the challenges of working with the high-dimensional design space of these networks. I will describe several competing approaches that seek to fully automate the network design process and the open mathematical questions for this problem.

Subscribe to