Welcome to the Week 9 Bulletin! See below for all relevant news and announcements.

To suggest an item for a future bulletin, please email @email.

undefined

Frequency synchronization induced by frequency detuning
Ocampo-Espindola, J Bick, C Motter, A Kiss, I Science Advances volume 11 issue 24 eadu4114 (13 Jun 2025)
Community detection on directed networks with missing edges
Pedreschi, N Lambiotte, R Bovet, A Journal of Physics: Complexity volume 6 issue 2 (26 Jun 2025)
Lifting couplings in Wasserstein spaces
Perrone, P Compositionality volume Volume 7 (2025) (07 May 2025)
Wed, 25 Jun 2025
15:00

Boundary cubulation is a pathway to residual finiteness

Thomas Ng
(Brandeis University)
Abstract

Actions on CAT(0) cube complexes are powerful geometric tool for both algebraically decomposing groups and establishing subgroup separability results.  I will describe boundaries associated to hyperbolic and relatively hyperbolic groups. With a focus on (quotients of) free products, I will discuss variations on a boundary criteria of Bergeron—Wise for exhibiting cocompact actions on CAT(0) cube complexes.  I will explain some ideas on how to use these tools to show that most (small-cancellation or random density) quotients of free products preserve residual finiteness. This is based on multiple joint works with subsets of Einstein, Krishna MS, Montee, and Steenbock.

Optimal execution and speculation with trade signals
Bank, P Cartea, A Koerber, L Finance and Stochastics
Thu, 27 Nov 2025

14:00 - 15:00
Lecture Room 3

The Role of Inexactness in Krylov Subspace Regularization for Inverse Problems

Malena Sabate Landman
((Mathematical Institute University of Oxford))
Abstract

Linear discrete inverse problems arise in many areas of science and engineering, from medical imaging and geophysics to atmospheric modelling. Their numerical solution often relies on iterative algorithms, particularly Krylov subspace methods, that can efficiently handle large-scale, ill-posed systems. In many practical settings, however, exact computations of matrix–vector products, preconditioners, or right-hand sides are either infeasible or unnecessary, leading to inexact iterations. This talk explores the interplay between inexactness and the regularizing behaviour of Krylov subspace methods for inverse problems. We discuss how approximate computations influence the regularization effect inherent in early iterations, as well as  semiconvergence, and how controlled inexactness may be exploited to improve computational efficiency. The aim is to provide a broad perspective on recent insights and open questions at the interface of inverse problems, iterative solvers, and computational inexactness.

Subscribe to