Thu, 12 Mar 2015
16:00
L4

Implied Volatility of Leveraged ETF Options: Consistency and Scaling​

Tim Siu-Tang Leung
(Colombia University)
Abstract

The growth of the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry has given rise to the trading of options written on ETFs and their leveraged counterparts (LETFs). Motivated by a number of empirical market observations, we study the relationship between the ETF and LETF implied volatility surfaces under general stochastic volatility models. Analytic approximations for prices and implied volatilities are derived for LETF ​options, along with rigorous error bounds. In these price and IV expressions, we identify their non-trivial dependence on the leverage ratio. Moreover, we introduce a "moneyness scaling" procedure to enhance the comparison of implied volatilities across leverage ratios, and test it with empirical price data.

Thu, 05 Mar 2015
16:00
L4

Measures of Systemic Risk

Stefan Weber
(Leibniz Universität Hannover)
Abstract
Systemic risk refers to the risk that the financial system is susceptible to failures due to the characteristics of the system itself. The tremendous cost of this type of risk requires the design and implementation of tools for the efficient macroprudential regulation of financial institutions. We propose a novel approach to measuring systemic risk.

Key to our construction is a rigorous derivation of systemic risk measures from the structure of the underlying system and the objectives of a financial regulator. The suggested systemic risk measures express systemic risk in terms of capital endowments of the financial firms. Their definition requires two ingredients: first, a random field that assigns to the capital allocations of the entities in the system a relevant stochastic outcome. The second ingredient is an acceptability criterion, i.e. a set of random variables that identifies those outcomes that are acceptable from the point of view of a regulatory authority. Systemic risk is measured by the set of allocations of additional capital that lead to acceptable outcomes. The resulting systemic risk measures are set-valued and can be studied using methods from set-valued convex analysis. At the same time, they can easily be applied to the regulation of financial institutions in practice.
 
We explain the conceptual framework and the definition of systemic risk measures, provide an algorithm for their computation, and illustrate their application in numerical case studies. We apply our methodology to systemic risk aggregation as described in Chen, Iyengar & Moallemi (2013) and to network models as suggested in the seminal paper of Eisenberg & Noe (2001), see also Cifuentes, Shin & Ferrucci (2005), Rogers & Veraart (2013), and Awiszus & Weber (2015). This is joint work with Zachary G. Feinstein and Birgit Rudloff
Tue, 24 Feb 2015
12:30
Oxford-Man Institute

Measuring and predicting human behaviour using online data

Tobias Preis
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

In this talk, I will outline some recent highlights of our research, addressing two questions. Firstly, can big data resources provide insights into crises in financial markets? By analysing Google query volumes for search terms related to finance and views of Wikipedia articles, we find patterns which may be interpreted as early warning signs of stock market moves. Secondly, can we provide insight into international differences in economic wellbeing by comparing patterns of interaction with the Internet? To answer this question, we introduce a future-orientation index to quantify the degree to which Internet users seek more information about years in the future than years in the past. We analyse Google logs and find a striking correlation between the country's GDP and the predisposition of its inhabitants to look forward. Our results illustrate the potential that combining extensive behavioural data sets offers for a better understanding of large scale human economic behaviour.
Subscribe to