Thu, 03 Feb 2011

16:00 - 17:00
L3

Constructing Abelian Varieties over $\overline{\mbthbb{Q}}$ Not Isogenous to a Jacobian

Jacob Tsimerman
(Princeton University)
Abstract

We discuss the following question of Nick Katz and Frans Oort: Given an

Algebraically closed field K , is there an Abelian variety over K of

dimension g which is not isogenous to a Jacobian? For K the complex

numbers

its easy to see that the answer is yes for g>3 using measure theory, but

over a countable field like $\overline{\mbthbb{Q}}$ new methods are required. Building on

work

of Chai-Oort, we show that, as expected, such Abelian varieties exist for

$K=\overline{\mbthbb{Q}}$ and g>3 . We will explain the proof as well as its connection to

the

Andre Oort conjecture.

Fri, 22 Oct 2010
14:15
DH 1st floor SR

Optimal Static-Dynamic Hedging under Convex Risk Measures

Ronnie Sircar
(Princeton University)
Abstract

The theory and computation of convex measures of financial risk has been a very active area of Financial Mathematics, with a rich history in a short number of years. The axioms specify sensible properties that measures of risk should possess (and which the industry's favourite, value-at-risk, does not). The most common example is related to the expectation of an exponential utility function.

A basic application is hedging, that is taking off-setting positions, to optimally reduce the risk measure of a portfolio. In standard continuous-time models with dynamic hedging, this leads to nonlinear PDE problems of HJB type. We discuss so-called static-dynamic hedging of exotic options under convex risk measures, and specifically the existence and uniqueness of an optimal position. We illustrate the computational challenge when we move away from the risk measure associated with exponential utility.

Joint work with Aytac Ilhan (Goldman Sachs) and Mattias Jonsson (University of Michigan).

Fri, 05 Feb 2010

11:00 - 12:00
Oxford-Man Institute

Rollover Risk and Credit Risk

Wei Xiong
(Princeton University)
Abstract

This paper models a firm’s rollover risk generated by con.ict of interest between debt and equity holders. When the firm faces losses in rolling over its maturing debt, its equity holders are willing to absorb the losses only if the option value of keeping the firm alive justifies the cost of paying off the maturing debt. Our model shows that both deteriorating market liquidity and shorter debt maturity can exacerbate this externality and cause costly firm bankruptcy at higher fundamental thresholds. Our model provides implications on liquidity- spillover effects, the flight-to-quality phenomenon, and optimal debt maturity structures.

Subscribe to Princeton University