C5

In this talk, I will discuss the important Grothendieck conjecture which originated Grothendieck-Teichmuller Theory, a bridge between Topology and Number Theory. On the geometric side, there is the study of automorphisms of mapping class groups that satisfy compatibility conditions with respect to subsurface inclusions. On the other side, there is the study of the absolute Galois group of the rationals, one of the most important objects in Number Theory today.
In my talk, I will introduce these objects and discuss the recent progress that has been made in understanding such automorphisms of mapping class groups. No background in Number Theory or Galois Theory is required.

Finiteness properties of groups provide various generalisations of the properties "finitely generated" and "finitely presented." We will define different types of finiteness properties and discuss Bestvina-Brady groups as they provide examples of groups with interesting combinations of finiteness properties.

Given a group G acting on a CAT(0) polygonal complex, X, it is natural to ask whether the structure of X allows us to deduce properties of G. We discuss some recent work on local properties that X may possess which allow us to answer these questions - in many cases we can in fact deduce that the group is a linear group over Z.

Given an arbitrary group presentation, often very little can be deduced about the underlying group. It is thus something of a miracle that many properties of one-relator groups can be simply read-off from the defining relator. In this talk, I will discuss some of the classical results in the theory of one-relator groups, as well as the key trick used in many of their proofs. Time-permitting, I'll also discuss more recent work on this subject, including some open problems.

“The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has today decided to award the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics for ground-breaking contributions to our understanding of complex physical systems”

Last Tuesday this announcement got many in our community very excited: never before had the Nobel prize been awarded to a topic so closely related to Network Science. We will try to understand the contributions that have led to this Nobel Prize announcement and their ties with networks science. The presentation will be held by Erik Hörmann, who has been lucky enough to have had the honour and pleasure of studying and working with one of the awardees, Professor Giorgio Parisi, before joining the Mathematical Institute.

Twisted K-theory is an enrichment of topological K-theory that allows local coefficient systems called twists. For spaces and twists equipped with an action by a group, equivariant twisted K-theory provides an even finer invariant. Equivariant twists over Lie groups gained increasing importance in the subject due to a result by Freed, Hopkins and Teleman that relates the corresponding K-groups to the Verlinde ring of the associated loop group. From the point of view of homotopy theory only a small subgroup of all possible twists is considered in classical treatments. In this talk I will discuss a construction that is joint work with David Evans and produces interesting examples of non-classical twists over the Lie groups SU(n) and over tori constructed from exponential functors. They arise naturally as Fell bundles and are equivariant with respect to the conjugation action of the group on itself. For the determinant functor our construction reproduces the basic gerbe over SU(n) used by Freed, Hopkins and Teleman.

This talk aims to provide a simple introduction on how to probe the
explicit geometry of certain moduli schemes arising in enumerative
geometry. Stable pairs, introduced by Pandharipande and Thomas in 2009, offer a curve-counting theory which is tamer than the Hilbert scheme of
curves used in Donaldson-Thomas theory. In particular, they exclude
curves with zero-dimensional or embedded components.

Ribbons are non-reduced schemes of dimension one, whose non-reduced
structure has multiplicity two in a precise sense. Following Ferrand, Banica, and Forster, there are several results on how to construct
ribbons (and higher non-reduced structures) from the data of line
bundles on a reduced scheme. With this approach, we can consider stable
pairs whose underlying curve is a ribbon: the remaining data is
determined by allowing devenerations of the line bundle defining the
double structure.

In 2013, Bhargava-Shankar proved that (in a suitable sense) the average rank of elliptic curves over Q is bounded above by 1.5, a landmark result which earned Bhargava the Fields medal. Later Bhargava-Gross proved similar results for hyperelliptic curves, and Poonen-Stoll deduced that most hyperelliptic curves of genus g>1 have very few rational points. The goal of my talk is to explain how simple curve singularities and simple Lie algebras come into the picture, via a modified Grothendieck-Brieskorn correspondence.

Moreover, I’ll explain how this viewpoint leads to new results on the arithmetic of curves in families, specifically for certain families of non-hyperelliptic genus 3 curves.

Topology optimisation finds the optimal material distribution of a fluid or solid in a domain, subject to PDE and volume constraints. There are many formulations and we opt for the density approach which results in a PDE, volume and inequality constrained, non-convex, infinite-dimensional optimisation problem without a priori knowledge of a good initial guess. Such problems can exhibit many local minima or even no minima. In practice, heuristics are used to obtain the global minimum, but these can fail even in the simplest of cases. In this talk, we will present an algorithm that solves such problems and systematically discovers as many of these local minima as possible along the way.