Evolution by natural selection has resulted in a remarkable diversity of organism
morphologies. But is it possible for developmental processes to create “any
possible shape?” Or are there intrinsic constraints? I will discuss our recent
exploration into the shapes of bird beaks. Initially, inspired by the discovery of
genes controlling the shapes of beaks of Darwin's finches, we showed that the
morphological diversity in the beaks of Darwin’s Finches is quantitatively
accounted for by the mathematical group of affine transformations. We have
extended this to show that the space of shapes of bird beaks is not large, and
that a large phylogeny (including finches, cardinals, sparrows, etc.) are
accurately spanned by only three independent parameters -- the shapes of these
bird beaks are all pieces of conic sections. After summarizing the evidence for
these conclusions, I will delve into our efforts to create mathematical models that
connect these patterns to the developmental mechanism leading to a beak. It
turns out that there are simple (but precise) constraints on any mathematical
model that leads to the observed phenomenology, leading to explicit predictions
for the time dynamics of beak development in song birds. Experiments testing
these predictions for the development of zebra finch beaks will be presented.
Based on the following papers:
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/8/3356.short
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140416/ncomms4700/full/ncomms4700.html