Thu, 20 Feb 2020

16:00 - 17:30
L3

The brain's waterscape

Marie Elisabeth Rognes
(Simula Research Laboratory)
Abstract

Your brain has its own waterscape: whether you are reading or sleeping, fluid flows around or through the brain tissue and clears waste in the process. These physiological processes are crucial for the well-being of the brain. In spite of their importance we understand them but little. Mathematics and numerics could play a crucial role in gaining new insight. Indeed, medical doctors express an urgent need for modeling of water transport through the brain, to overcome limitations in traditional techniques. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to the numerics of the brain’s waterscape however, and fundamental knowledge is missing. In this talk, I will discuss mathematical models and numerical methods for the brain's waterscape across scales - from viewing the brain as a poroelastic medium at the macroscale and zooming in to studying electrical, chemical and mechanical interactions between brain cells at the microscale.
 

Further Information

Short bio:

Marie E. Rognes is Chief Research Scientist and Research Professor in Scientific Computing and Numerical Analysis at Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway. She received her Ph.D from the University of Oslo in 2009 with an extended stay at the University of Minneapolis, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, US. She has been at Simula Research Laboratory since 2009, led its Department for Biomedical Computing from 2012-2016 and currently leads a number of research projects focusing on mathematical modelling and numerical methods for brain mechanics including an ERC Starting Grant in Mathematics. She won the 2015 Wilkinson Prize for Numerical Software, the 2018 Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters Prize for Young Researchers within the Natural Sciences, and was a Founding Member of the Young Academy of Norway.

A Search for MeV to TeV Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts with IceCube
Sullivan, G Stürwald, T Tollefson, K Stuttard, T Tomankova, L Terliuk, A Tenholt, F Taboada, I Tilav, S Tselengidou, M Toscano, S Turley, C Turcati, A Turcotte, R Tönnis, C Trettin, A Tung, C Tosi, D Vandenbroucke, J Elorrieta, M Eijndhoven, N Driessche, W Vanheule, S Unger, E Usner, M The Astrophysical Journal: an international review of astronomy and astronomical physics (18 Feb 2020)
Modelling our Galaxy
Binney, J (05 Sep 2019)
Experimental estimation of tungsten impurity sputtering due to Type I ELMs in JET-ITER-like wall using pedestal electron cyclotron emission and target Langmuir probe measurements
Guillemaut, C Jardin, A Horacek, J Borodkina, I Autricque, A Arnoux, G Boom, J Brezinsek, S Coenen, J De La Luna, E Devaux, S Eich, T Harting, D Kirschner, A Lipschultz, B Matthews, G Meigs, A Moulton, D O’Mullane, M Stamp, M Physica Scripta volume T167 014005 (20 Feb 2016)
Application of modeling approaches to explore vaccine adjuvant mode-of-action
Buckley, P Alden, K Coccia, M Chalon, A Collignon, C Temmerman, S Didierlaurent, A Van Der Most, R Timmis, J Andersen, C Coles, M Frontiers in Immunology (12 Sep 2019)
Wed, 27 Nov 2019
16:00
C1

Hierarchies in one-relator groups

Marco Linton
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

A group splits as an HNN-extension if and only if the rank of its abelianisation is strictly positive. If we fix a class of groups one may ask a few questions about these splittings: How distorted are the vertex and edge groups? What form can the vertex and edge groups take? If they remain in our fixed class, do they also split? If so, under iteration will we terminate at something nice? In this talk we will answer all these questions for the class of one-relator groups and go through an example or two. Time permitting, we will also discuss possible generalisations to groups with staggered presentations.

Wed, 30 Oct 2019
16:00
C1

Equivariant Simplicial Reconstruction

Naya Yerolemou
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will answer the following question: given a finite simplicial complex X acted on by a finite group G, which object stores the minimal amount of information about the symmetries of X in such a way that we can reconstruct both X and the group action? The natural first guess would be the quotient X/G, which remembers one representative from each orbit. However, it does not tell us the size of each orbit or how to glue together simplices to recover X. Our desired object is, in fact, a complex of groups. We will understand two processes: compression and reconstruction and see primarily through an example how to answer our initial question.

Wed, 23 Oct 2019
16:00
C1

Surfaces via subsurfaces: an introduction to Masur-Minsky

Harry Petyt
(University of Bristol)
Abstract

The mapping class group of a surface is a group of homeomorphisms of that surface, and these groups have been very well studied in the last 50 years. The talk will be focused on a way to understand such a group by looking at the subsurfaces of the corresponding surface; this is the so-called "Masur-Minsky hierarchy machinery". We'll finish with a non-technical discussion of hierarchically hyperbolic groups, which are a popular area of current research, and of which mapping class groups are important motivating examples. No prior knowledge of the objects involved will be assumed.

Wed, 16 Oct 2019
16:00
C1

What Does a Cayley Graph Look Like?

Alice Kerr
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Every Cayley graph of a finitely generated group has some basic properties: they are locally finite, connected, and vertex-transitive. These are not sufficient conditions, there are some well known examples of graphs that have all these properties but are non-Cayley. These examples do however "look like" Cayley graphs, which leads to the natural question of if there exist any vertex-transitive graphs that are completely unlike any Cayley graph. I plan to give some of the history of this question, as well as the construction of the example that finally answered it.

 

Tue, 04 Feb 2020

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Genus one mirror symmetry

Dennis Eriksson
(Chalmers University)
Abstract

Mirror symmetry, in a crude formulation, is usually presented as a correspondence between curve counting on a Calabi-Yau variety X, and some invariants extracted from a mirror family of Calabi-Yau varieties. After the physicists Bershadsky-Cecotti-Ooguri-Vafa (henceforth BCOV), this is organised according to the genus of the curves in X we wish to enumerate, and gives rise to an infinite recurrence of differential equations. In this talk, I will give a general introduction to these problems, and present a rigorous mathematical formulation of the BCOV conjecture at genus one, in terms of a lifting of the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch. I will explain the main ideas of the proof of the conjecture for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in projective space, based on the Riemann-Roch theorem in Arakelov geometry. Our results generalise from dimension 3 to arbitrary dimensions previous work of Fang-Lu-Yoshikawa.
 

This is joint work with G. Freixas and C. Mourougane.

Subscribe to