Motivated by the study of supersymmetric backgrounds with non-trivial fluxes, we provide a formulation of supergravity in the language of generalised geometry, as first introduced by Hitchin, and its extensions. This description both dramatically simplifies the equations of the theory by making the hidden symmetries manifest, and writes the bosonic sector geometrically as a direct analogue of Einstein gravity. Further, a natural analogue of special holonomy manifolds emerges and coincides with the conditions for supersymmetric backgrounds with flux, thus formulating these systems as integrable geometric structures.
 

Dellamonica, Kohayakawa, Rödl and Ruciński showed that for $p=C(\log n/n)^{1/d}$ the random graph $G(n,p)$ contains asymptotically almost surely all spanning graphs $H$ with maximum degree $d$ as subgraphs. In this talk I will discuss a resilience version of this result, which shows that for the same edge density, even if a $(1/k-\epsilon)$-fraction of the edges at every vertex is deleted adversarially from $G(n,p)$, the resulting graph continues to contain asymptotically almost surely all spanning $H$ with maximum degree $d$, with sublinear bandwidth and with at least $C \max\{p^{-2},p^{-1}\log n\}$ vertices not in triangles. Neither the restriction on the bandwidth, nor the condition that not all vertices are allowed to be in triangles can be removed. The proof uses a sparse version of the Blow-Up Lemma. Joint work with Peter Allen, Julia Ehrenmüller, Anusch Taraz.

Erdős asked the following question: given a positive integer $n$, what is the largest integer $k$ such that any set of $n$ points in a plane, with no $4$ on a line, contains $k$ points no $3$ of which are collinear? Füredi proved that $k = o(n)$. Cardinal, Toth and Wood extended this result to $\mathbb{R}^3$, finding sets of $n$ points with no $5$ on a plane whose subsets with no $4$ points on a plane have size $o(n)$, and asked the question for the higher dimensions. For given $n$, let $k$ be largest integer such that any set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with no more than $d + 1$ cohyperplanar points, has $k$ points with no $d + 1$ on a hyperplane. Is $k = o(n)$? We prove that $k = o(n)$ for any fixed $d \geq 3$.

The chiral scalar superfield has interesting BRST cohomology, but the relevant cohomology objects all  have spinor indices. So they cannot occur in an action. They need to be coupled to a chiral dotted spinor superfield. Until now, this has been very problematic, since no sensible action for a chiral dotted spinor superfield was known.  The most obvious such action contains higher derivatives and tachyons.

Now,  a sensible  action has been found. When coupled to the cohomology, this action removes the supersymmetry charge from the theory while maintaining the rigidity and power of supersymmetry.The simplest example of this phenomenon has exactly the fermion content of the Leptons or the Quarks.  The mechanism has the potential to get around the cosmological constant problem, and also the problem of the sum rules of spontaneously broken supersymmetry.

I shall demonstrate, under some mild assumptions, that the symmetry group of  extreme, Killing, supergravity horzions contains an sl(2, R) subalgebra.  The proof requires a generalization of the  Lichnerowicz theorem for non-metric connections. The techniques developed can also be applied in the classification
of AdS and Minkowski flux backgrounds.
 

I will speak about weak Fano 3-folds, K3 surfaces and their Picard lattices, and explain how to solve the matching problem in various situations.