Fri, 05 Mar 2021

14:00 - 15:00
Virtual

Graduated orders and their lattices

Miriam Norris
(King's College London)
Abstract

For $G$ a finite group, $p$ a prime and $(K, \mathcal{O}_K, k)$ a $p$-modular system the group ring $\mathcal{O}_K G$ is an $\mathcal{O}_k$-order in the $K$-algebra $KG.$ Graduated $\mathcal{O}_K$-orders are a particularly nice class of $\mathcal{O}_K$-orders first introduced by Zassenhaus. In this talk will see that an $\mathcal{O}_K$-order $\Lambda$ in a split $K$-algebra $A$ is graduated if the decomposition numbers for the regular $A$-module are no greater than $1$. Furthermore will see that graduated orders can be described (not uniquely) by a tuple $n$ and a matrix $M$ called the exponant matrix. Finding a suitable $n$ and $M$ for a graduated order $\Lambda$ in the $K$-algebra $A$ provides a parameterisation of the $\Lambda$-lattices inside the regular $A$-module. Understanding the $\mathcal{O}_K G$-lattices inside representations of certain groups $G$ is of interest to those involved in the Langlands programme as well as of independent interest to algebraists.

Take a piece of rope and knot it as you wish. When you are done, glue the two extremities together and you will obtain a physical realisation of what mathematicians also call a knot: a simple closed curve in 3-dimensional space. Now, put the knotted rope on a table and take a picture of it from above. It is now a planar projection of your knot. The mathematical equivalent of it is a knot diagram with multiple crossings as shown in the figure.

Wed, 10 Feb 2021

16:00 - 17:00

Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces

Ivan Solonenko
Abstract

Totally geodesic submanifolds are perhaps one of the easiest types of submanifolds of Riemannian manifolds one can study, since a maximal totally geodesic submanifold is completely determined by any one of its points and the tangent space at that point. It comes as a bit of a surprise then that classification of such submanifolds — up to an ambient isometry — is a nightmarish and widely open question, even on such a manageable and well-understood class of Riemannian manifolds as symmetric spaces.

We will discuss the theory of totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces and see that any maximal such submanifold is homogeneous and thus can be completely encoded by some Lie algebraic data called a 'Lie triple'. We will then talk about the duality between symmetric spaces of compact and noncompact type and discover that there is a one-to-one correspondence between totally geodesic submanifolds of a symmetric space and its dual. Finally, we will touch on the known classification in rank one symmetric spaces, namely in spheres and projective/hyperbolic spaces over real normed division algebras. Time permitting, I will demonstrate how all this business comes in handy in other geometric problems on symmetric spaces, e. g. in classification of isometric cohomogeneity one actions.

Link: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZGRiMTM1ZjQtZWNi…

Mon, 08 Feb 2021
12:45
Virtual

Confinement in 4d N=1 from 6d N=(2,0)

Lakshya Bhardwaj
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will discuss confinement in 4d N=1 theories obtained after soft supersymmetry breaking deformations of 4d N=2 Class S theories. Confinement is characterised by a subgroup of the 1-form symmetry group of the theory that is left unbroken in a massive vacuum of the theory. The 1-form symmetry group is encoded in the Gaiotto curve associated to the Class S theory, and its spontaneous breaking in a vacuum is encoded in the N=1 curve (which plays the role of Seiberg-Witten curve for N=1) associated to that vacuum. Using this proposal, we will recover the expected properties of confinement in N=1 SYM theories, and the theories studied by Cachazo, Douglas, Seiberg and Witten. We will also recover the dependence of confinement on the choice of gauge group and discrete theta parameters in these theories.

Thu, 11 Feb 2021

16:00 - 17:00

Bayesian Inference for Economic Agent-Based Models using Tools from Machine Learning

DONOVAN PLATT
((Oxford University))
Abstract

Recent advances in computing power and the potential to make more realistic assumptions due to increased flexibility have led to the increased prevalence of simulation models in economics. While models of this class, and particularly agent-based models, are able to replicate a number of empirically-observed stylised facts not easily recovered by more traditional alternatives, such models remain notoriously difficult to estimate due to their lack of tractable likelihood functions. While the estimation literature continues to grow, existing attempts have approached the problem primarily from a frequentist perspective, with the Bayesian estimation literature remaining comparatively less developed. For this reason, we introduce a widely-applicable Bayesian estimation protocol that makes use of deep neural networks to construct an approximation to the likelihood, which we then benchmark against a prominent alternative from the existing literature.
 

Thu, 25 Feb 2021

16:00 - 17:00

Large–scale Principal-agent Problems in Continuous–time

EMMA HUBERT
(Imperial College London)
Abstract

In this talk, we will introduce two problems of contract theory, in continuous–time, with a multitude of agents. First, we will study a model of optimal contracting in a hierarchy, which generalises the one–period framework of Sung (2015). The hierarchy is modeled by a series of interlinked principal–agent problems, leading to a sequence of Stackelberg equilibria. More precisely, the principal (she) can contract with a manager (he), to incentivise him to act in her best interest, despite only observing the net benefits of the total hierarchy. The manager in turn subcontracts the agents below him. Both agents and the manager each independently control a stochastic process representing their outcome. We will see through a simple example that even if the agents only control the drift of their outcome, the manager controls the volatility of the Agents’ continuation utility. Even this first simple example justifies the use of recent results on optimal contracting for drift and volatility control, and therefore the theory on 2BSDEs. We will also discuss some possible extensions of this model. In particular, one extension consists in the elaboration of more general contracts, indexing the compensation of one worker on the result of the others. This increase in the complexity of contracts is beneficial for the principal, and constitutes a first approach to even more complex contracts, in the case, for example, of a continuum of workers with mean–field interactions. This will lead us to introduce the second problem, namely optimal contracting for demand–response management, which consists in extending the model by Aïd, Possamaï, and Touzi (2019) to a mean–field of consumers. Finally, we will conclude by mentioning that this principal-agent approach with a multitude of agents can be used to address many situations, for example to model incentives for
lockdown in the current epidemic context.
 

Thu, 04 Mar 2021

16:00 - 17:00

Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulator

HUINING YANG
((Oxford University))
Abstract

We explore reinforcement learning methods for finding the optimal policy in the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem. In particular, we consider the convergence of policy gradient methods in the setting of known and unknown parameters. We are able to produce a global linear convergence guarantee for this approach in the setting of finite time horizon and stochastic state dynamics under weak assumptions. The convergence of a projected policy gradient method is also established in order to handle problems with constraints. We illustrate the performance of the algorithm with two examples. The first example is the optimal liquidation of a holding in an asset. We show results for the case where we assume a model for the underlying dynamics and where we apply the method to the data directly. The empirical evidence suggests that the policy gradient method can learn the global optimal solution for a larger class of stochastic systems containing the LQR framework and that it is more robust with respect to model mis-specification when compared to a model-based approach. The second example is an LQR system in a higher-dimensional setting with synthetic data.

Subscribe to