Given a Shimura variety, I will show how to define a corresponding two-sorted structure. Based on work of Chris Daw and Adam Harris, we will study what is needed for the class of this structures to be categorical. Of course, an introduction to Shimura varieties will be given.
In an interview with Rolling Stone Magazine in 1965, Bob Dylan was pushed to define himself: Do you think of yourself primarily as a singer or a poet? To which, Dylan famously replied: Oh, I think of myself more as a song and dance man, y’know. Dylan’s attitude to pigeonholing resonates with many applied mathematicians. I lack the coolness factor of Dylan, but if pushed about defining what kind of mathematician I am, I would say: Oh, I think myself more as an equation and matrix guy, y’know.
We give a construction of a boundary (the Morse boundary) which can be assigned to any proper geodesic metric space and which is rigid, in the sense that a quasi-isometry of spaces induces a homeomorphism of boundaries. To obtain a more workable invariant than the homeomorphism type, I will introduce the metric Morse boundary and discuss notions of capacity and conformal dimensions of the metric Morse boundary. I will then demonstrate that these dimensions give useful invariants of relatively hyperbolic and mapping class groups. This is joint work with Matthew Cordes (Technion).
Inspired by the theory of JSJ decomposition for 3-manifolds, one can define the JSJ decomposition of a group as a maximal canonical way of cutting it up into simpler pieces using amalgamated products and HNN extensions. If the group in question has some sort of non-positive curvature property then one can define a boundary at infinity for the group, which captures its large scale geometry. The JSJ decomposition of the group is then reflected in the treelike structure of the boundary. In this talk I will discuss this connection in the case of hyperbolic groups and explain some of the ideas used in its proof by Brian Bowditch.
Asymptotic dimension is a large-scale analogue of Lebesgue covering dimension. I will give a gentle introduction to asymptotic dimension, prove some basic propeties and give some applications to group theory. I will then define coarse homology and explain how when defined, virtual cohomological dimension gives a lower bound on asymptotic dimension.
For a smooth projective scheme Y over W(k) we consider an element in the motivic Chow group of the reduction Y_m over the truncated Witt ring W_m(k) and give a "Hodge" criterion - using the crystalline cycle class in relative crystalline cohomology - for the element to the lift to the continuous Chow group of Y. The result extends previous work of Bloch-Esnault-Kerz on the p-adic variational Hodge conjecture to a relative setting. In the course of the proof we derive two new results on the relative de Rham-Witt complex and its Nygaard filtration, and work with relative syntomic complexes to define relative motivic complexes for a smooth, formal lifting of Y_m over W(W_m(k)).
to come
Oxford Mathematics Public Lectures
The Law of the Few - Sanjeev Goyal
The study of networks offers a fruitful approach to understanding human behaviour. Sanjeev Goyal is one of its pioneers. In this lecture Sanjeev presents a puzzle:
In social communities, the vast majority of individuals get their information from a very small subset of the group – the influencers, connectors, and opinion leaders. But empirical research suggests that there are only minor differences between the influencers and the others. Using mathematical modelling of individual activity and networking and experiments with human subjects, Sanjeev helps explain the puzzle and the economic trade-offs it contains.
Professor Sanjeev Goyal FBA is the Chair of the Economics Faculty at the University of Cambridge and was the founding Director of the Cambridge-INET Institute.
28 June 2017, 5.00-6.00pm, Lecture Theatre 1, Mathematical Institute Oxford.
Please email @email to register
From the tobacco companies in the fifties to the arguments of the Brexit campaign, Economist and BBC Radio 4 Presenter Tim Harford takes us on a tour of truths, facts and the weapon that is doubt. Surely fact-checking websites and rational thinking are the best weapons to convince people of the truth? Or is in fact the truth simply not good enough. Do we have time or any inclination to hear it? Maybe we need to start with something simpler. Perhaps arousing people's curiosity might be just as important.
