Mathematical Institute

Motivated by the work of K.R. Rajagopal, the objective of the talk is to discuss the construction and analysis of numerical approximations to a class of models that fall outside the realm of classical Cauchy elasticity. The models under consideration are implicit and nonlinear, and are referred to as strain-limiting, because the linearised strain remains bounded even when the stress is very large, a property that cannot be guaranteed within the framework of classical elastic or nonlinear elastic models. Strain-limiting models can be used to describe, for example, the behavior of brittle materials in the vicinity of fracture tips, or elastic materials in the neighborhood of concentrated loads where there is concentration of stress even though the magnitude of the strain tensor is limited.

We construct a finite element approximation of a strain-limiting elastic model and discuss the theoretical difficulties that arise in proving the convergence of the numerical method. The analytical results are illustrated by numerical experiments.

The talk is based on joint work with Andrea Bonito (Texas A&M University) and Vivette Girault (Sorbonne Université, Paris).

--

A link for this talk will be sent to our mailing list a day or two in advance.  If you are not on the list and wish to be sent a link, please contact @email.

Often in scattering applications it is advantageous to reformulate the problem as an integral equation, discretize, and then solve the resulting linear system using a fast direct solver. The computational cost of this approach is typically dominated by the work needed to compress the coefficient matrix into a rank-structured format. In this talk, we present a novel technique which exploits the bandlimited-nature of solutions to the Helmholtz equation in order to accelerate this procedure in environments where multiple frequencies are of interest.

This talk is based on joint work with Gunnar Martinsson (UT Austin).

-

A link for this talk will be sent to our mailing list a day or two in advance.  If you are not on the list and wish to be sent a link, please contact @email.

Here we propose a new method to compare the modular structure of a pair of node-aligned networks. The majority of current methods, such as normalized mutual information, compare two node partitions derived from a community detection algorithm yet ignore the respective underlying network topologies. Addressing this gap, our method deploys a community detection quality function to assess the fit of each node partition with respect to the other network's connectivity structure. Specifically, for two networks A and B, we project the node partition of B onto the connectivity structure of A. By evaluating the fit of B's partition relative to A's own partition on network A (using a standard quality function), we quantify how well network A describes the modular structure of B. Repeating this in the other direction, we obtain a two-dimensional distance measure, the bi-directional (BiDir) distance. The advantages of our methodology are three-fold. First, it is adaptable to a wide class of community detection algorithms that seek to optimize an objective function. Second, it takes into account the network structure, specifically the strength of the connections within and between communities, and can thus capture differences between networks with similar partitions but where one of them might have a more defined or robust community structure. Third, it can also identify cases in which dissimilar optimal partitions hide the fact that the underlying community structure of both networks is relatively similar. We illustrate our method for a variety of community detection algorithms, including multi-resolution approaches, and a range of both simulated and real world networks.