Oxford

Let p>0 be a prime number. We shall describe a short Frobenius-theoretic proof of the Adams-Riemann-Roch theorem for the p-th Adams operation, when the involved schemes live in characteristic p and the morphism is smooth. This result implies the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem for smooth morphisms in positive characteristic and the Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch theorem in any characteristic. This is joint work with R. Pink.

New ambitwistor string models are presented for a variety of theories and older models are shown to work at 1 loop and perhaps higher using a simpler formulation on the Riemann sphere.

Many people talk about properties that you would expect of a group. When they say this they are considering random groups, I will define what it means to pick a random group in one of many models and will give some properties that these groups will have with overwhelming probability. I will look at the proof of some of these results although the talk will mainly avoid proving things rigorously.

In 1964 Golod and Shafarevich discovered a powerful tool that gives a criteria for when a certain presentation defines an infinite dimensional algebra. In my talk I will assume the main machinery of the Golod-Shafarevich inequality for graded algebras and use it to provide counter examples to certain analogues of the Burnside problem in infinite dimensional algebras and infinite groups. Then, time dependent, I will define the Tarski number for groups relating to the Banach-Tarski paradox and show that we can using the G-S inequality show that the set of Tarski numbers is unbounded. Despite the fact we can only find groups of Tarski number 4, 5 and 6.

The study of rational points on K3 surfaces has recently seen a lot of activity. We discuss how to compute the Picard rank of a K3 surface over a number field, and the implications for the Brauer-Manin obstruction.

I will introduce classical results on finiteness theorem with a way of connecting them to idea of covering spaces. I will talk about the proof of FLT under this connection.

In this talk I will define algebraic automorphic forms, first defined by Gross, which are objects that are conjectured to have Galois representations attached to them. I will explain how this fits into the general picture of the Langlands program and, giving some examples, briefly describe one method of proving certain cases of the conjecture. 

This talk will be an easy introduction to some CAT(0) geometry. Among other things, we'll see why centralizers in groups acting geometrically on CAT(0) spaces split (at least virtually). Time permitting, we'll see why having a geometric action on a CAT(0) space is not a quasi-isometry invariant.