Mon, 09 Dec 2019

14:15 - 15:45
L3

Low-dimensional quantum Yang-Mills measures

ILYA CHEVYREV
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Yang-Mills theory plays an important role in the Standard Model and is behind many mathematical developments in geometric analysis. In this talk, I will present several recent results on the problem of constructing quantum Yang-Mills measures in 2 and 3 dimensions. I will particularly speak about a representation of the 2D measure as a random distributional connection and as the invariant measure of a Markov process arising from stochastic quantisation. I will also discuss the relationship with previous constructions of Driver, Sengupta, and Lévy based on random holonomies, and the difficulties in passing from 2 to 3 dimensions. Partly based on joint work with Ajay Chandra, Martin Hairer, and Hao Shen.

Tue, 29 Oct 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L6

Covering random graphs by monochromatic subgraphs, and related results

Daniel Korandi
(University of Oxford)
Further Information

How many monochromatic paths, cycles or general trees does one need to cover all vertices of a given r-edge-colored graph G? Such questions go back to the 1960's and have been studied intensively in the past 50 years. In this talk, I will discuss what we know when G is the random graph G(n,p). The problem turns out to be related to the following question of Erdős, Hajnal and Tuza: What is the largest possible cover number of an r-uniform hypergraph where any k edges have a cover of size l.

The results I mention give new bounds for these problems, and answer some questions by Bal and DeBiasio, and others. The talk is based on collaborations with Bucić, Mousset, Nenadov, Škorić and Sudakov.

Wed, 04 Dec 2019
16:00
C1

Double branched cover of knotoids, f-distance and entanglement in proteins.

Agnese Barbensi
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Knotoids are a generalisation of knots that deals with open curves. In the past few years, they’ve been extensively used to classify entanglement in proteins. Through a double branched cover construction, we prove a 1-1 correspondence between knotoids and strongly invertible knots. We characterise forbidden moves between knotoids in terms of equivariant band attachments between strongly invertible knots, and in terms of crossing changes between theta-curves. Finally, we present some applications to the study of the topology of proteins. This is based on joint works with D.Buck, H.A.Harrington, M.Lackenby and with D. Goundaroulis.

Thu, 10 Oct 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L4

Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networks

Patrick Kidger
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

The classical Universal Approximation Theorem certifies that the universal approximation property holds for the class of neural networks of arbitrary width. Here we consider the natural `dual' theorem for width-bounded networks of arbitrary depth, for a broad class of activation functions. In particular we show that such a result holds for polynomial activation functions, making this genuinely different to the classical case. We will then discuss some natural extensions of this result, e.g. for nowhere differentiable activation functions, or for noncompact domains.
 

Wed, 20 Nov 2019
16:00
C1

The homology of the mapping class group

Luciana Bonatto
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will discuss what it means to study the homology of a group via the construction of the classifying space. We will look at some examples of this construction and some of its main properties. We then use this to define and study the homology of the mapping class group of oriented surfaces, focusing on the approach used by Harer to prove his Homology Stability Theorem.

Wed, 13 Nov 2019
16:00
C1

Immersed surfaces in cubed three manifolds: a prescient vision.

Daniel Woodhouse
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

When Gromov defined non-positively curved cube complexes no one knew what they would be useful for.
Decades latex they played a key role in the resolution of the Virtual Haken conjecture.
In one of the early forays into experimenting with cube complexes, Aitchison, Matsumoto, and Rubinstein produced some nice results about certain "cubed" manifolds, that in retrospect look very prescient.
I will define non-positively curved cube complexes, what it means for a 3-manifold to be cubed, and discuss what all this Haken business is about.
 

Wed, 06 Nov 2019
16:00
C1

JSJ Decompositions of Groups

Sam Shepherd
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

A graph of groups decomposition is a way of splitting a group into smaller and hopefully simpler groups. A natural thing to try and do is to keep splitting until you can't split anymore, and then argue that this decomposition is unique. This is the idea behind JSJ decompositions, although, as we shall see, the strength of the uniqueness statement for such a decomposition varies depending on the class of groups that we restrict our edge groups to

Mon, 28 Oct 2019

15:45 - 16:45
L3

Tail universality of Gaussian multiplicative chaos

MO DICK WONG
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Abstract: Gaussian multiplicative chaos (GMC) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to its applications in many areas such as Liouville CFT and random matrix theory, but despite its importance not much has been known about its distributional properties. In this talk I shall explain the study of the tail probability of subcritical GMC and establish a precise formula for the leading order asymptotics, resolving a conjecture of Rhodes and Vargas.

Wed, 30 Oct 2019
16:00
C1

Equivariant Simplicial Reconstruction

Naya Yerolemou
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We will answer the following question: given a finite simplicial complex X acted on by a finite group G, which object stores the minimal amount of information about the symmetries of X in such a way that we can reconstruct both X and the group action? The natural first guess would be the quotient X/G, which remembers one representative from each orbit. However, it does not tell us the size of each orbit or how to glue together simplices to recover X. Our desired object is, in fact, a complex of groups. We will understand two processes: compression and reconstruction and see primarily through an example how to answer our initial question.

Wed, 16 Oct 2019
16:00
C1

What Does a Cayley Graph Look Like?

Alice Kerr
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Every Cayley graph of a finitely generated group has some basic properties: they are locally finite, connected, and vertex-transitive. These are not sufficient conditions, there are some well known examples of graphs that have all these properties but are non-Cayley. These examples do however "look like" Cayley graphs, which leads to the natural question of if there exist any vertex-transitive graphs that are completely unlike any Cayley graph. I plan to give some of the history of this question, as well as the construction of the example that finally answered it.

 

Subscribe to University of Oxford