Thu, 06 May 2021
14:00
Virtual

A proximal quasi-Newton trust-region method for nonsmooth regularized optimization

Dominique Orban
(École Polytechnique Montréal)
Abstract

We develop a trust-region method for minimizing the sum of a smooth term f and a nonsmooth term h, both of which can be nonconvex. Each iteration of our method minimizes a possibly nonconvex model of f+h in a trust region. The model coincides with f+h in value and subdifferential at the center. We establish global convergence to a first-order stationary point when f satisfies a smoothness condition that holds, in particular, when it has Lipschitz-continuous gradient, and h is proper and lower semi-continuous. The model of h is required to be proper, lower-semi-continuous and prox-bounded. Under these weak assumptions, we establish a worst-case O(1/ε^2) iteration complexity bound that matches the best known complexity bound of standard trust-region methods for smooth optimization. We detail a special instance in which we use a limited-memory quasi-Newton model of f and compute a step with the proximal gradient method, resulting in a practical proximal quasi-Newton method. We describe our Julia implementations and report numerical results on inverse problems from sparse optimization and signal processing. Our trust-region algorithm exhibits promising performance and compares favorably with linesearch proximal quasi-Newton methods based on convex models.

This is joint work with Aleksandr Aravkin and Robert Baraldi.

-

A link for this talk will be sent to our mailing list a day or two in advance.  If you are not on the list and wish to be sent a link, please contact @email.

Mon, 29 Mar 2021

16:00 - 17:00
Virtual

Intro to Lawrence-Venkatesh's proof of Mordell-Faltings

Jay Swar
Abstract

This talk will be the first in a spin-off series on the Lawrence-Venkatesh approach to showing that every hyperbolic curve$/K$ has finitely many $K$-points. In this talk, we will give the overall outline of the approach and prove several of  the preliminary results, such as Faltings' finiteness theorem for semisimple Galois representations.

Fri, 11 Jun 2021

16:00 - 17:00
Virtual

North Meets South

Jaclyn Lang and Jan Sbierski
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Jaclyn Lang
Explicit Class Field Theory
Class field theory was a major achievement in number theory
about a century ago that presaged many deep connections in mathematics
that today are known as the Langlands Program.  Class field theory
associates to each number field an special extension field, called the
Hilbert class field, whose ring of integers satisfies unique
factorization, mimicking the arithmetic in the usual integers.  While
the existence of this field is always guaranteed, it is a difficult
problem to find explicit generators for the Hilbert class field in
general.  The theory of complex multiplication of elliptic curves is
essentially the only setting where there is an explicit version of class
field theory.  We will briefly introduce class field theory, highlight
what is known in the theory of complex multiplication, and end with an
example for the field given by a fifth root of 19.  There will be many
examples!

 

Jan Sbierski
The strength of singularities in general relativity
One of the many curious features of Einstein’s theory of general relativity is that the theory predicts its own breakdown at so-called gravitational singularities. The gravitational field in general relativity is modelled by a Lorentzian manifold — and thus a gravitational singularity is signalled by the geometry of the Lorentzian manifold becoming singular. In this talk I will first review the classical definition of a gravitational singularity along with a classification of their strengths. I will conclude with outlining newly developed techniques which capture the singularity at the level of the connection of Lorentzian manifolds.

 

 

Fri, 28 May 2021

16:00 - 17:00
Virtual

North Meets South

Clemens Koppensteiner and David Gómez-Castro
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Clemens Koppensteiner
Categorifying Heisenberg algebras

Categorification replaces set-theoretic structures with category-theoretic analogues. We discuss what this means and why it is useful. We then discuss recent work on categorifying Heisenberg algebras and their Fock space representations. In particular this gives a satisfying answer to an observation about equivariant K-theory made by Ian Grojnowski in 1996.

 

Aggregation-Diffusion Equations
David Gómez-Castro

The aim of this talk is to discuss an evolution problem modelling particles systems exhibiting aggregation and diffusion phenomena, and we will focus mostly on the so-called Aggregation-Diffusion Equation: ∂ρ ∂t = ∇ · (ρ ∇(U′ (ρ) + V + W ∗ ρ)) (ADE)

First, we will discuss the modelling. The famous case U′ (ρ) = log ρ and W = 0 is the famous Heat Equation. In the classical literature, the term U′(ρ) is typically deduced from Darcy’s law and models an internal energy of the system. We will show through particle systems how the term V models a confinement energy and W ∗ ρ an aggregation energy. The complete model covers many famous examples from different disciplines: Porous Media, Fokker-Plank, Keller-Segel and others. After this modelling, we discuss the mathematical treatment of (ADE). As in the case of the Heat Equation, the diffusion cases where W = V = 0 are typically studied in the Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces. However, as in the Keller-Segel problem, a Dirac measures may appear in finite time. We present the Wasserstein distance between measures, which is a natural framework for these equations, connecting with the theory of Optimal Transport. In fact, when U, V and W are convex, (ADE) can be studied as the gradient-flow of a free-energy functional (i.e. curves minimising this energy) in this Wasserstein distance, applying Calculus of Variations techniques. We will discuss the minimisation problem associated to F, with an interest to the existence of Dirac measures. Finally, we will present new results showing that indeed, in some cases besides Keller-Segel, states with a Delta can be achieved through solutions of the evolution problem

Fri, 18 Jun 2021

16:00 - 17:00
Virtual

Ethics and responsible innovation - what is it and how does it affect our research in mathematics?

Helena Webb
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

How aware should we be of letting AI make decisions on prison sentences? Or what is our responsibility in ensuring that mathematics does not predict another global stock crash?

In this talk, Helena will outline how we can view ethics and responsibility as central to processes of innovation and describe her experiences applying this perspective to teaching in the Department of Computer Science. There will be a chance to open up discussion about how this same approach can be applied in other Departments here in Oxford.

Helena is an interdisciplinary researcher working in the Department of Computer Science. She works on projects that involve examining the social impacts of computer-based innovations and identifying the ways in which these innovations can better meet societal needs and empower users. Helena is very passionate about the need to embed ethics and responsibility into processes of learning and research in order to foster technologies for the social good.

Mon, 26 Apr 2021

15:45 - 16:45
Virtual

Classifying simple amenable C*-algebras

Stuart White
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

C*-algebras provide non commutative analogues of locally compact Hausdorff spaces. In this talk I’ll provide a survey of the large scale project to classify simple amenable C*-algebras, indicating the role played by non commutative versions of topological ideas. No prior knowledge of C*-algebras will be assumed.

Mon, 31 May 2021

15:45 - 16:45
Virtual

Classifying spaces of low-dimensional bordism categories

Jan Steinebrunner
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

The d-dimensional bordism category Cob_d has as objects closed (d-1)-manifolds and as morphisms diffeomorphism classes of d-dimensional bordisms. For d=1 and d=2 this category is well understood because we have a complete list of all 1 or 2-manifolds with boundary. In this talk I will argue that the categories Cob_1 and Cob_2 nevertheless carry a lot of interesting structure. 

I will show that the classifying spaces B(Cob_1) and B(Cob_2) contain interesting moduli spaces coming from the combinatorics of how 1 or 2 manifolds can be glued along their boundary. In particular, I will introduce the notion of a "factorisation category" and explain how it relates to Connes' cyclic category for d=1 and to the moduli space of tropical curves for d=2. If time permits, I will sketch how this relates to the curve complex and moduli spaces of complex curves.

Mon, 17 May 2021

15:45 - 16:45
Virtual

Tail equivalence of unicorn paths

Piotr Przytycki
(McGill University)
Abstract

Let S be an orientable surface of finite type. Using Pho-On's infinite unicorn paths, we prove the hyperfiniteness of the orbit equivalence relation coming from the action of the mapping class group of S on the Gromov boundary of the arc graph of S. This is joint work with Marcin Sabok.

Mon, 10 May 2021

15:45 - 16:45
Virtual

Exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds

Samuel Edwards
(Yale University)
Abstract

The geodesic flow on hyperbolic finite-volume hyperbolic manifolds is a particularly well-studied dynamical system; this is in part due to its connection to other important dynamical systems on the manifold, as well as orbital counting and other number-theoretic problems related to discrete subgroups of orthogonal groups. In recent years, there has been some interest in generalizing many of the properties of the geodesic flow on finite-volume manifolds to the infinite-volume setting. I will discuss joint work with Hee Oh in which we establish exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on infinite-volume geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds with large enough critical exponent. Patterson-Sullivan densities and Burger-Roblin measures, the Lax-Phillips spectral gap for the Laplace operator on infinite volume geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds, and complementary series representations are all involved in both the statement and proof of our result, and I will try to explain how these different objects are related in this setting.

Subscribe to Virtual