Wed, 14 Mar 2012

15:45 - 16:45
L2

(HoRSe seminar) Defining the refined vertex using equivariant K-theory II

Nikita Nekrasov
(IHES)
Abstract

String theory derives the features of the quantum field theory describing the gauge interactions between the elementary particles in four spacetime dimensions from the physics of strings propagating on the internal manifold, e.g. a Calabi-Yau threefold. A simplified version of this correspondence relates the SU(2)-equivariant generalization of the Donaldson theory (and its further generalizations involving the non-abelian monopole equations) to the Gromov-Witten (GW) theory of the so-called local Calabi-Yau threefolds, for the SU(2) subgroup of the rotation symmetry group SO(4). In recent years the GW theory was related to the Donaldson-Thomas (DT) theory enumerating the ideal sheaves of curves and points. On the toric local Calabi-Yau manifolds the latter theory is studied using localization, producing the so-called topological vertex formalism (which was originally based on more sophisticated open-closed topological string dualities).

In order to accomodate the full SO(4)-equivariant version of the four dimensional Donaldson theory, the so-called "refined topological vertex" was proposed. Unlike that of the ordinary topological vertex, its relation to the DT theory remained unclear.

In these talks, based on joint work with Andrei Okounkov, this gap will be partially filled by showing that the equivariant K-theoretic version of the DT theory reproduces both the SO(4)-equivariant Donaldson theory in four dimensions, and the refined topologica vertex formalism, for all toric Calabi-Yau's admitting the latter.

Wed, 14 Mar 2012

14:00 - 15:00
L2

(HoRSe seminar) Defining the refined vertex using equivariant K-theory I

Nikita Nekrasov
(Paris)
Abstract

String theory derives the features of the quantum field theory describing the gauge interactions between the elementary particles in four spacetime dimensions from the physics of strings propagating on the internal manifold, e.g. a Calabi-Yau threefold. A simplified version of this correspondence relates the SU(2)-equivariant generalization of the Donaldson theory (and its further generalizations involving the non-abelian monopole equations) to the Gromov-Witten (GW) theory of the so-called local Calabi-Yau threefolds, for the SU(2) subgroup of the rotation symmetry group SO(4). In recent years the GW theory was related to the Donaldson-Thomas (DT) theory enumerating the ideal sheaves of curves and points. On the toric local Calabi-Yau manifolds the latter theory is studied using localization, producing the so-called topological vertex formalism (which was originally based on more sophisticated open-closed topological string dualities).

In order to accomodate the full SO(4)-equivariant version of the four dimensional Donaldson theory, the so-called "refined topological vertex" was proposed. Unlike that of the ordinary topological vertex, its relation to the DT theory remained unclear.

In these talks, based on joint work with Andrei Okounkov, this gap will be partially filled by showing that the equivariant K-theoretic version of the DT theory reproduces both the SO(4)-equivariant Donaldson theory in four dimensions, and the refined topological vertex formalism, for all toric Calabi-Yau's admitting the latter.

Tue, 06 Mar 2012
17:00
L2

Type theories and algebraic theories.

Dr Kobi Kremnitzer
(Oxford)
Abstract

By recent work of Voevodsky and others, type theories are now considered as a candidate

for a homotopical foundations of mathematics. I will explain what are type theories using the language

of (essentially) algebraic theories. This shows that type theories are in the same "family" of algebraic

concepts such as groups and categories. I will also explain what is homotopic in (intensional) type theories.

Tue, 28 Feb 2012
17:00
L2

"Tits alternatives for graph products of groups".

Ashot Minasyan
(University of Southampton)
Abstract

 Graph products of groups naturally generalize direct and free products and have a rich subgroup structure. Basic examples of graph products are right angled Coxeter and Artin groups. I will discuss various forms of Tits Alternative for subgroups and
their stability under graph products. The talk will be based on a joint work with Yago Antolin Pichel.

Tue, 31 Jan 2012
17:00
L2

"On the undecidability of profinite triviality"

Professor Martin Bridson
(Oxford)
Abstract

In this talk I'll describe recent work with Henry Wilton (UCL) in which

we prove that there does not exist an algorithm that can determine which

finitely presented groups have a non-trivial finite quotient.

Tue, 17 Jan 2012
17:00
L2

Representation Theoretic Patterns in Digital Signal Processing I: Computing the Matched Filter in Linear Time

Professor S Gurevich
(Wisconsin)
Abstract

In the digital radar problem we design a function (waveform) S(t) in the Hilbert space H=C(Z/p) of complex valued functions on Z/p={0,...,p-1}, the integers modulo a prime number p>>0. We transmit the function S(t) using the radar to the object that we want to detect. The wave S(t) hits the object, and is reflected back via the echo wave R(t) in H, which has the form

R(t) = exp{2πiωt/p}⋅S(t+τ) + W(t),

where W(t) in H is a white noise, and τ,ω in ℤ/p, encode the distance from, and velocity of, the object.

Problem (digital radar problem) Extract τ,ω from R and S.

I first introduce the classical matched filter (MF) algorithm that suggests the 'traditional' way (using fast Fourier transform) to solve the digital radar problem in order of p^2⋅log(p) operations. I will then explain how to use techniques from group representation theory to design (construct) waveforms S(t) which enable us to introduce a fast matched filter (FMF) algorithm, that we call the "flag algorithm", which solves the digital radar problem in a much faster way of order of p⋅log(p) operations. I will demonstrate additional applications to mobile communication, and global positioning system (GPS).

This is a joint work with A. Fish (Math, Madison), R. Hadani (Math, Austin), A. Sayeed (Electrical Engineering, Madison), and O. Schwartz (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berkeley).

Fri, 02 Mar 2012
16:30
L2

Mathematics of Phase Transitions From pde' s to many particle systems and back?

Stephan Luckhaus
Abstract

What is a phase transition?

The first thing that comes to mind is boiling and freezing of water. The material clearly changes its behaviour without any chemical reaction. One way to arrive at a mathematical model is to associate different material behavior, ie., constitutive laws, to different phases. This is a continuum physics viewpoint, and when a law for the switching between phases is specified, we arrive at pde problems. The oldest paper on such a problem by Clapeyron and Lame is nearly 200 years old; it is basically on what has later been called the Stefan problem for the heat equation.

The law for switching is given e.g. by the melting temperature. This can be taken to be a phenomenological law or thermodynamically justified as an equilibrium condition.

The theory does not explain delayed switching (undercooling) and it does not give insight in structural differences between the phases.

To some extent the first can be explained with the help of a free energy associated with the interface between different phases. This was proposed by Gibbs, is relevant on small space scales, and leads to mean curvature equations for the interface – the so-called Gibbs Thompson condition.

The equations do not by themselves lead to a unique evolution. Indeed to close the resulting pde’s with a reasonable switching or nucleation law is an open problem.

Based on atomistic concepts, making use of surface energy in a purely phenomenological way, Becker and Döring developed a model for nucleation as a kinetic theory for size distributions of nuclei. The internal structure of each phase is still not considered in this ansatz.

An easier problem concerns solid-solid phase transitions. The theory is furthest developped in the context of equilibrium statistical mechanics on lattices, starting with the Ising model for ferromagnets. In this context phases correspond to (extremal) equilibrium Gibbs measures in infinite volume. Interfacial free energy appears as a finite volume correction to free energy.

The drawback is that the theory is still basically equilibrium and isothermal. There is no satisfactory theory of metastable states and of local kinetic energy in this framework.

Fri, 10 Feb 2012
16:30
L2

The topology and geometry of automorphism groups of free groups

Professor Karen Vogtmann
(Cornell University)
Abstract

Free groups, free abelian groups and fundamental groups of

closed orientable surfaces are the most basic and well-understood examples

of infinite discrete groups. The automorphism groups of these groups, in

contrast, are some of the most complex and intriguing groups in all of

mathematics. I will give some general comments about geometric group

theory and then describe the basic geometric object, called Outer space,

associated to automorphism groups of free groups.

This Colloquium talk is the first of a series of three lectures given by

Professor Vogtmann, who is the European Mathematical Society Lecturer. In

this series of three lectures, she will discuss groups of automorphisms

of free groups, while drawing analogies with the general linear group over

the integers and surface mapping class groups. She will explain modern

techniques for studying automorphism groups of free groups, which include

a mixture of topological, algebraic and geometric methods.

Subscribe to L2