17:00
The extensive correspondence of John Wallis (1616–1703)
Abstract
What do historians of mathematics do? What sort of questions do they ask? What kinds of sources do they use? This series of four informal lectures will demonstrate some of the research on history of mathematics currently being done in Oxford. The subjects range from the late Renaissance mathematician Thomas Harriot (who studied at Oriel in 1577) to the varied and rapidly developing mathematics of the seventeenth century (as seen through the eyes of Savilian Professor John Wallis, and others) to the emergence of a new kind of algebra in Paris around 1830 in the work of the twenty-year old Évariste Galois.
Each lecture will last about 40 minutes, leaving time for questions and discussion. No previous knowledge is required: the lectures are open to anyone from the department or elsewhere, from undergraduates upwards.
17:00
The life, work, and reputation of Thomas Harriot (1560–1621)
Abstract
What do historians of mathematics do? What sort of questions do they ask? What kinds of sources do they use? This series of four informal lectures will demonstrate some of the research on history of mathematics currently being done in Oxford. The subjects range from the late Renaissance mathematician Thomas Harriot (who studied at Oriel in 1577) to the varied and rapidly developing mathematics of the seventeenth century (as seen through the eyes of Savilian Professor John Wallis, and others) to the emergence of a new kind of algebra in Paris around 1830 in the work of the twenty-year old Évariste Galois.
Each lecture will last about 40 minutes, leaving time for questions and discussion. No previous knowledge is required: the lectures are open to anyone from the department or elsewhere, from undergraduates upwards.
(HoRSe seminar) Motivic sheaves over excellent schemes
Abstract
Starting from Morel and Voevodsky's stable homotopy theory of schemes, one defines, for each noetherian scheme of finite dimension $X$, the triangulated category $DM(X)$ of motives over $X$ (with rational coefficients). These categories satisfy all the the expected functorialities (Grothendieck's six operations), from
which one deduces that $DM$ also satisfies cohomological proper
descent. Together with Gabber's weak local uniformisation theorem,
this allows to prove other expected properties (e.g. finiteness
theorems, duality theorems), at least for motivic sheaves over
excellent schemes.
Bilinear Forms and Differential Forms under Field Extensions
Abstract
An important problem in algebra is the study of algebraic objects
defined over fields and how they behave under field extensions,
for example the Brauer group of a field, Galois cohomology groups
over fields, Milnor K-theory of a field, or the Witt ring of bilinear
forms over
a field. Of particular interest is the determination
of the kernel of the restriction map when passing to a field extension.
We will give an overview over some known results concerning the
kernel of the restriction map from the Witt ring of a field to the
Witt ring of an extension field. Over fields of characteristic
not two, general results are rather sparse. In characteristic two,
we have a much more complete picture. In this talk, I will
explain the full solution to this problem for extensions that are
given by function fields of hypersurfaces over fields of
characteristic two. An important tool is the study of the
behaviour of differential forms over fields of positive
characteristic under field extensions. The result for
Witt rings in characteristic two then follows by applying earlier
results by Kato, Aravire-Baeza, and Laghribi. This is joint
work with Andrew Dolphin.
16:30
Tanagawa Numbers via Nonabelian Poincare Duality
Abstract
Let L be a positive definite lattice. There are only finitely many positive definite lattices
L' which are isomorphic to L modulo N for every N > 0: in fact, there is a formula for the number of such lattices, called the Siegel mass formula. In this talk, I'll review the Siegel mass formula and how it can be deduced from a conjecture of Weil on volumes of adelic points of algebraic groups. This conjecture was proven for number fields by Kottwitz, building on earlier work of Langlands and Lai. I will conclude by sketching joint work (in progress) with Dennis Gaitsgory, which uses topological ideas to attack Weil's conjecture in the case of function fields.
16:30
Convergence of renormalization
Abstract
Since the work of Feigenbaum and Coullet-Tresser on universality in the period doubling bifurcation, it is been understood that crucial features of unimodal (one-dimensional) dynamics depend on the behavior of a renormalization (and infinite dimensional) dynamical system. While the initial analysis of renormalization was mostly focused on the proof of existence of hyperbolic fixed points, Sullivan was the first to address more global aspects, starting a program to prove that the renormalization operator has a uniformly hyperbolic (hence chaotic) attractor. Key to this program is the proof of exponential convergence of renormalization along suitable ``deformation classes'' of the complexified dynamical system. Subsequent works of McMullen and Lyubich have addressed many important cases, mostly by showing that some fine geometric characteristics of the complex dynamics imply exponential convergence.
We will describe recent work (joint with Lyubich) which moves the focus to the abstract analysis of holomorphic iteration in deformation spaces. It shows that exponential convergence does follow from rougher aspects of the complex dynamics (corresponding to precompactness features of the renormalization dynamics), which enables us to conclude exponential convergence in all cases.
Hopf-Galois extensions and an exact sequence for H-Picard groups
Abstract
The topic of this talk is the representation theory of Hopf-Galois extensions. We consider the following questions.
Let H be a Hopf algebra, and A, B right H-comodule algebras. Assume that A and B are faithfully flat H-Galois extensions.
1. If A and B are Morita equivalent, does it follow that the subalgebras A^coH and B^coH of H-coinvariant elements are also Morita equivalent?
2. Conversely, if A^coH and B^coH are Morita equivalent, when does it follow that A and B are Morita equivalent?
As an application, we investigate H-Morita autoequivalences of the H-Galois extension A, introduce the concept of H-Picard group, and we establish an exact sequence linking the H-Picard group of A and
the Picard group of A^coH.(joint work with Stefaan Caenepeel)