L3

This is a sequel to Lecture I (given in the algebra seminar, Tuesday). It will be slightly more specialized. The finite Weil representation is the algebra object that governs the symmetries of the Hilbert space H =C(Z/p): The main objective of this talk is to introduce the geometric Weil representation which is an algebra-geometric (l-adic perverse

Weil sheaf) counterpart of the finite Weil representation. Then, I will explain how the geometric Weil representation is used to prove the main technical results stated in Lecture I. In the course, I will explain the Grothendieck geometrization procedure by which sets are replaced by algebraic varieties and functions by sheaf theoretic objects. This is a joint work with R. Hadani (Austin).

There is a beautiful classification of full (rational) CFT due to

Fuchs, Runkel and Schweigert. The classification says roughly the

following. Fix a chiral algebra A (= vertex algebra). Then the set of

full CFT whose left and right chiral algebras agree with A is

classified by Frobenius algebras internal to Rep(A). A famous example

to which one can successfully apply this is the case when the chiral

algebra A is affine su(2): in that case, the Frobenius algebras in

Rep(A) are classified by A_n, D_n, E_6, E_7, E_8, and so are the

corresponding CFTs.

Recently, Kapustin and Saulina gave a conceptual interpretation of the

FRS classification in terms of 3-dimentional Chern-Simons theory with

defects. Those defects are also given by Frobenius algebras in Rep(A).

Inspired by the proposal of Kapustin and Saulina, we will (partially)

construct the three-tier CFT associated to a given Frobenius algebra.

I will present a two-parameter family of Wilson loop operators in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory which interpolates smoothly between the 1/2 BPS line or circle and a pair of antiparallel lines. These observables capture a natural generalization of the quark-antiquark potential. These loops are calculated on the gauge theory side to second order in perturbation theory and in a semiclassical expansion in string theory to one-loop order. The resulting determinants are given in integral form and can be evaluated numerically for general values of the parameters or analytically in a systematic expansion around the 1/2 BPS configuration. I will comment about the feasibility of deriving all-loop results for these Wilson loops.

This is the first of two talks about Derived Algebraic Geometry. Due to the vastity of the theory, the talks are conceived more as a kind of advertisement on this theory and some of its interesting new features one should contemplate and try to understand, as it might reveal interesting new insights also on classical objects, rather than a detailed and precise exposition. We will start with an introduction on the very basic idea of this theory, and we will expose some motivations for introducing it. After a brief review on the existing literature and a speculation about homotopy theories and higher categorical structures, we will review the theory of dg-categories, model categories, S-categories and Segal categories. This is the technical part of the seminar and it will give us the tools to understand the basic setting of Topos theory and Homotopical Algebraic Geometry, whose applications will be exploited in the next talk.

I will give a brief introduction into how Elliptic curves can be used to define complex oriented

cohomology theories. I will start by introducing complex oriented cohomology theories, and then move onto

formal group laws and a theorem of Quillen. I will then end by showing how the formal group law associated

to an elliptic curve can, in many cases, allow one to define a complex oriented cohomology theory.

I will discuss some of new concepts and objects of two-dimensional number theory: 

how the same object can be studied via low dimensional noncommutative theories or higher dimensional commutative ones, 

what is higher Haar measure and harmonic analysis and how they can be used in representation theory of non locally compact groups such as loop groups and Kac-Moody groups, 

how classical notions split into two different notions on surfaces on the example of adelic structures, 

what is the analogue of the double quotient of adeles on surfaces and how one

could approach automorphic functions in geometric dimension two.

Translation actions appear all over geometry, so it is not surprising that there are many cases of moduli problems which involve non-reductive group actions, where Mumford’s geometric invariant theory does not apply. One example is that of jets of holomorphic map germs from the complex line to a projective variety, which is a central object in global singularity theory. I will explain how to construct this moduli space using the test curve model of Morin singularities and how this can be generalized to study the quotient of projective varieties by a wide class of non-reductive groups. In particular, this gives information about the invariant ring. This is joint work with Frances Kirwan.

I'll present the work of Gaitsgory arXiv:1108.1741. In it he uses Beilinson-Drinfeld factorization techniques in order to uniformize the moduli stack of G-bundles on a curve. The main difference with the gauge theoretic technique is that the the affine Grassmannian is far from being contractible but the fibers of the map to Bun(G) are contractible.