L4

We find exact solutions of Maxwell's equations that are the precise analog of plane waves, but in the case that the translation group is replaced by the Abelian helical group. These waves display constructive/destructive interference with helical atomic structures, in the same way that plane waves interact with crystals. We show how the resulting far-field pattern can be used for structure determination. We test the method by doing theoretical structure determination on the Pf1 virus from the Protein Data Bank. The underlying mathematical idea is that the structure is the orbit of a group, and this group is a subgroup of the invariance group of the differential equations. Joint work with Dominik Juestel and Gero Friesecke. (Acta Crystallographica A72 and SIAM J. Appl Math).

The talk will review the origins
of ambitwistor strings, and  recent progress in extending them to a
wider variety of theories and loop amplitudes.

An essential ingredient of AdS/CFT, dS/CFT and other dualities is a geometric notion of scattering that refers to asymptotics rather than, say, infinite time limits. Though one expects non-perturbative versions to exist in the case of linear quantum fields (and non-linear classical fields), this has been rigorously implemented in Lorentzian settings only relatively recently. The goal of this talk will be to give an overview in different geometrical setups, including asymptotically Minkowski, de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter spacetimes. In particular I will discuss recent results on classical scattering and particle interpretations, compare them with the setup of conformal scattering and explain how they can be used to construct "in-out" Feynman propagators (based on joint works with Christian Gérard and András Vasy).

Amplitudes in planar N=4 SYM are dual to light-like polygonal Wilson-loop expectation values. In many cases their perturbative expansion can be expressed in terms of multiple polylogarithms which also obey certain single-valuedness conditions or branch cut restrictions. The rigidity of this function space, together with a few other conditions, allows one to construct the six-point amplitude -- or hexagonal Wilson loop -- through at least five loops, and the seven-point amplitude through 3.5 loops. Then one can "fold" the polygonal Wilson loops into multiple degenerate configurations, expressing the limiting behavior in terms of simpler function spaces, and learning in the process about how amplitudes factorize.
 

I will define the notion of "sheaf of categories with a local action of Hochschild cochains" over a stack. (This notion is analogous to D-modules, in the same way as the notion of "sheaf of categories" is analogous to quasi-coherent sheaves.) I will prove that both categories appearing in geometric Langlands carry this structure over the stack of de Rham {\check{G}}-local systems. Using this, I will explain how to glue D-mod(Bun_G) out of *tempered* D-modules associated to smaller Levi subgroups of G.

The study of separating invariants is a new trend in Invariant Theory and a return to its roots: invariants as a classification tool. For a finite group acting linearly on a vector space, a separating set is simply a set of invariants whose elements separate the orbits o the action. Such a set need not generate the ring of invariants. In this talk, we give lower bounds on the size of separating sets based on the geometry of the action. These results are obtained via the study of the local cohomology with support at an arrangement of linear subspaces naturally arising from the action.

(Joint with Jack Jeffries)

The local Langlands correspondence for classical groups gives a natural finite-to-one map between certain representations of p-adic classical groups and certain self-dual representations of the absolute Weil group of a p-adic field (and more). On both sides of the correspondence, the description of the representations involves a ``wild part'' of more arithmetic nature and a ``tame part'' of more geometric nature, and the notion of endo-parameter (due to Bushnell--Henniart for general linear groups) is designed to describe the ``wild part'' of the Langlands correspondence. I will explain what this means and the connection with representations of affine Hecke algebras. This is joint work with Blondel--Henniart, with Lust, and with Kurinczuk--Skodlerack.