Tue, 11 Feb 2020

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Ranks of cubic surfaces

Anna Seigal
(Oxford)
Abstract

There are various notions of rank, which measure the complexity of a tensor or polynomial. Cubic surfaces can be viewed as symmetric tensors.  We consider the non-symmetric tensor rank and the symmetric Waring rank of cubic surfaces, and show that the two notions coincide over the complex numbers. The results extend to order three tensors of all sizes, implying the equality of rank and symmetric rank when the symmetric rank is at most seven. We then explore the connection between the rank of a polynomial and the singularities of its vanishing locus, and we find the possible singular loci of a cubic surface of given rank. This talk is based on joint work with Eunice Sukarto.
 

Tue, 04 Feb 2020

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Genus one mirror symmetry

Dennis Eriksson
(Chalmers University)
Abstract

Mirror symmetry, in a crude formulation, is usually presented as a correspondence between curve counting on a Calabi-Yau variety X, and some invariants extracted from a mirror family of Calabi-Yau varieties. After the physicists Bershadsky-Cecotti-Ooguri-Vafa (henceforth BCOV), this is organised according to the genus of the curves in X we wish to enumerate, and gives rise to an infinite recurrence of differential equations. In this talk, I will give a general introduction to these problems, and present a rigorous mathematical formulation of the BCOV conjecture at genus one, in terms of a lifting of the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch. I will explain the main ideas of the proof of the conjecture for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in projective space, based on the Riemann-Roch theorem in Arakelov geometry. Our results generalise from dimension 3 to arbitrary dimensions previous work of Fang-Lu-Yoshikawa.
 

This is joint work with G. Freixas and C. Mourougane.

Tue, 05 Nov 2019

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Axiomatizability and profinite groups

Dan Segal
(Oxford University)
Abstract

A mathematical structure is `axiomatizable' if it is completely determined by some family of sentences in a suitable first-order language. This idea has been explored for various kinds of structure, but I will concentrate on groups. There are some general results (not many) about which groups are or are not axiomatizable; recently there has been some interest in the sharper concept of 'finitely axiomatizable' or FA - that is, when only a finite set of sentences (equivalently, a single sentence) is allowed.

While an infinite group cannot be FA, every finite group is so, obviously. A profinite group is kind of in between: it is infinite (indeed, uncountable), but compact as a topological group; and these groups share many properties of finite groups, though sometimes for rather subtle reasons. I will discuss some recent work with Andre Nies and Katrin Tent where we prove that certain kinds of profinite group are FA among profinite groups. The methods involve a little model theory, and quite a lot of group theory.

 

Tue, 22 Oct 2019
14:15
L4

Representations associated to gradations of colour Lie algebras

Philippe Meyer
(Oxford University)
Abstract

The notion of colour Lie algebra, introduced by Ree (1960), generalises notions of Lie algebra and Lie superalgebra. From an orthogonal representation V of a quadratic colour Lie algebra g, we give various ways of constructing a colour Lie algebra g’ whose bracket extends the bracket of g and the action of g on V. A first possibility is to consider g’=g⊕V and requires the cancellation of an invariant studied by Kostant (1999). Another construction is possible when the representation is ``special’’ and in this case the extension is of the form g’=g⊕sl(2,k)⊕V⊗k^2. Covariants are associated to special representations and satisfy to particular identities generalising properties studied by Mathews (1911) on binary cubics. The 7-dimensional fundamental representation of a Lie algebra of type G_2 and the 8-dimensional spinor representation of a Lie algebra of type so(7) are examples of special representations.

Tue, 24 Sep 2019
14:15
L4

Contravariant forms on Whittaker modules

Adam Brown
(IST Austria)
Abstract

In 1985, McDowell introduced a family of parabolically induced Whittaker modules over a complex semisimple Lie algebra, which includes both Verma modules and the nondegenerate Whittaker modules studied by Kostant. Many classical results for Verma modules and the Bernstein--Gelfand--Gelfand category O have been generalized to the category of Whittaker modules introduced by Milicic--Soergel, including the classification of irreducible objects and the Kazhdan--Lusztig conjectures. Contravariant forms on Verma modules are unique up to scaling and play a key role in the definition of the Jantzen filtration. In this talk I will discuss a classification of contravariant forms on parabolically induced Whittaker modules. In a recent result, joint with Anna Romanov, we show that the dimension of the space of contravariant forms on a parabolically induced Whittaker module is given by the cardinality of a Weyl group. This result illustrates a divergence from classical results for Verma modules, and gives insight to two significant open problems in the theory of Whittaker modules: the Jantzen conjecture and the absence of an algebraic definition of duality.

Tue, 29 Oct 2019

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Isotropic motives

Alexander Vishik
(Nottingham)
Abstract

The idea of isotropic localization is to substitute an algebro-geometric object (motive)
by its “local” versions, parametrized by finitely generated extensions of the ground field k. In the case of the so-called “flexible” ground field, the complexity of the respective “isotropic motivic categories” is similar to that of their topological counterpart. At the same time, new features appear: the isotropic motivic cohomology of a point encode Milnor’s cohomological operations, while isotropic Chow motives (hypothetically) coincide with Chow motives modulo numerical equivalence (with finite coefficients). Extended versions of the isotropic category permit to access numerical Chow motives with rational coefficients providing a new approach to the old questions related to them. The same localization can be applied to the stable homotopic category of Morel- Voevodsky producing “isotropic” versions of the topological world. The respective isotropic stable homotopy groups of spheres exhibit interesting features.

Fri, 13 Dec 2019

11:45 - 13:15
L4

InFoMM CDT Group Meeting

Jonathan Grant Peters, Victor Wang, James Morrill, Lingyi Yang
(Mathematical Institute)
Mon, 02 Dec 2019

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Cohomology of non-reductive GIT quotients and hyperbolicity

Frances Kirwan
(Oxford)
Abstract

The aim of this talk is to describe joint work with Gergely Berczi using a recent extension to non-reductive actions of geometric invariant theory, and its links with moment maps in symplectic geometry, to study hyperbolicity of generic hypersurfaces in a projective space. Using intersection theory for non-reductive GIT quotients applied to  compactifications of bundles of invariant jet differentials over complex manifolds leads to a proof of the Green-Griffiths-Lang conjecture for a generic projective hypersurface of dimension n whose degree is greater than n^6. A recent result of Riedl and Yang then implies the Kobayashi conjecture for generic hypersurfaces of degree greater than (2n-1)^6.

Tue, 27 Aug 2019
12:00
L4

Aspects of Scattering Amplitudes and Moduli Space Localization

Sebastian Mizera
(Perimeter/IAS Princeton)
Abstract

 It has been long known that intersection theory on the moduli space of punctured Riemann surfaces encodes observables in two-dimensional quantum gravity. It is natural to ask whether interacting theories could also admit a similar description. In the genus-zero case we put forward a twisted version of intersection theory on the moduli space and propose that it computes tree-level scattering amplitudes in a range of quantum field theories with a finite spectrum of particles. The resulting intersection numbers exhibit two alternative kinds of localization formulae. The first one receives contributions only from boundaries of the moduli space, thus leading to a Feynman diagram expansion, while the second one localizes on critical points of a certain Morse function.

 

Subscribe to L4