N3.12

We will talk about set theory, and, more specifically, forcing. Forcing is powerful. It is the go-to method for proving the independence of the continuum hypothesis or for understanding the (lack of) fine structure of the real numbers. However, forcing is hard. Keen to export their theorems to more mainstream areas of mathematics, set theorists have tackled this issue by inventing forcing axioms, (relatively) simple mathematical statements which describe sophisticated forcing extensions. In my talk, I will present the basics of forcing, I will introduce some interesting forcing axioms and I will show how these might be used to obtain surprising independence results.

This will be the final mathematrix meeting for the term and we will be discussing Implicit Bias. In short, Implicit Bias is to do with perceptions and judgements we unconsciously make about people based on preconceptions we have about certain appearances, background or other characteristics. Even if we are not aware of making these judgements, they can affect our actions and decisions none-the-less. For a slightly longer introduction about this topic and how it can relate to academia, we suggest reading the following article: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6289/1067.full

In this session we hope to explain more about what implicit bias is, how it might affect us, and discuss ways to avoid implicit bias and make ourselves and others more aware of it.

Everyone is welcome! Monday, 1300-1400, Quillen Room (N3.12), with lunch provided.

What does abstract nonsense (category theory) have to do with the apparently opposite proverbial concreteness of physics? In this talk I will try to convey the importance of understanding physical theories from a compositional and structural perspective, where the fundamental logic of interaction between systems becomes the real protagonist. Firstly, we will see how different classes of symmetric monoidal categories can be used to model physical processes in a very natural and intuitive way. We will then explore the claim that category theory is not only useful in providing a unified framework, but it can be also used to perfect and modify preexistent models. In this direction, I will show how the introduction of a trace in the symmetric monoidal category describing QIT can be used to talk about quantum interactions induced by cyclic causal relationships.

Nets of lines are line arrangements satisfying very strict intersection conditions. We will see that nets can be defined in a very natural way in algebraic geometry, and, thanks to the strict intersection properties they satisfy, we will see that a lot can be said about classifying them over the complex numbers. Despite this, there are still basic unanswered questions about nets, which we will discuss. 
 

This week is a women's only week in which we are joined by the Mirzakhani society, the society for undergraduate women in maths, for lunch.

We are very excited to have another session with invited speakers joining us for the lunch next week. Annika Heckel, Frances Kirwan and Marc Lackenby will all be joining us for a panel discussion on balancing family with academia. All are welcome to join us and to ask questions. 

We hope to see many of you at the lunch - Monday 1-2pm Quillen Room (N3.12).

The core idea behind metric spaces is the triangular inequality. Metrics have been generalized in many ways, but the most tempting way to alter them would be to "flip" the triangular inequality, obtaining an "anti-metric". This, however, only allows for trivial spaces where the distance between any two points is 0. However, if we intertwine the concept of antimetrics with the structures of partial linear--and cyclic--orders, we can define a structure where the anti-triangular inequality holds conditionally. We define this structure, give examples, and show an interesting result involving metrics and antimetrics.

In this talk we will introduce quantifier elimination and give various examples of theories with this property. We will see some very useful applications of quantifier elimination to algebra and geometry that will hopefully convince you how practical this property is to other areas of mathematics.

In this talk, we shall introduce various identities among partitions of integers, and how these can be expressed via formal power series. In particular, we shall look at the Rogers Ramanujan identities of power series, and discuss possible combinatorial proofs using partitions and Durfree squares.

Gathering for women and non-binary mathematicians