N3.12

There are many natural questions one can ask about presentations of finite groups- for instance, given two presentations of the same group with the same number of generators, must the number of relations also be equal? This question, and closely related ones, are unsolved. However if one asks the same question in the category of profinite groups, surprisingly strong properties hold- including a positive answer to the above question. I will make this statement precise and give the proof of this and similar results due to Alex Lubotzky.

In my talk I will give a basic introduction to the finiteness properties of groups and their relation to subgroups of direct products of groups. I will explain the relation between such subgroups and fibre products of groups, and then proceed with a discussion of the n-(n+1)-(n+2)-Conjecture and the Virtual Surjections Conjecture. While both conjectures are still open in general, they are known to hold in special cases. I will explain how these results can be applied to prove that there are groups with arbitrary (non-)finiteness properties.

For every $\epsilon>0$ does there exist some $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and a bijection $f:\mathbb{Z}_n\to\mathbb{Z}_n$ such that $f(x+1)=2f(x)$ for at least $(1-\epsilon)n$ elements of $\mathbb{Z}_n$ and $f(f(f(f(x))))=(x)$ for all $x\in\mathbb{Z}_n$? I will discuss this question and its relation to an important open problem in the theory of countable discrete groups.

The Robin-Schensted-Knuth insertion algorithm provides a bijection between non-negative integer matrices and pairs of semistandard Young tableau. However, by relaxing the conditions on the correspondence, it allows us to define the Poirer-Reutenauer bialgebra, which exactly describes the algebra of symmetric functions viewed as generated by the Schur polynomials. This gives an interesting combinatorial decomposition of symmetric products of Schur polynomials, called a Littlewood Richardson rule, which we will discuss. We will then power through as many generalisations as I have time for: Hecke insertion and stable Grothendieck polynomials, shifted insertion and Schur P-functions, and shifted Hecke insertion and weak shifted stable Grothendieck polynomials

Deficiency is a measure of how complicated the presentations of a particular group need to be; it is defined as the maximum of the number of generators minus the number of relators (over all finite presentations of the group). This talk will introduce the basics of deficiency, give a deft example of Swan which illustrates why our understanding of deficiency is deficient, and conclude with some new examples that defy this defeatism: finite $p$-groups can have any deficiency you could (reasonably) wish for.

For a prime number p, we will consider completed group algebras, or Iwasawa algebras, of the form kG, for G a complete p-valued group of finite rank, k a field of characteristic p. Classifying the ideal structure of Iwasawa algebras has been an ongoing project within non-commutative algebra and representation theory, and we will discuss ideas related to this topic based on previous work and try to extend it. An important concept in studying ideals of group algebras is the notion of controlling ideals, where we say a closed subgroup H of G controls a right ideal I of kG if I is generated by a subset of kH. It was proved by Konstantin Ardakov in 2012 that for G nilpotent, every faithful prime ideal of kG is controlled by the centre of G, and it follows that the prime spectrum of kG can be realised as the disjoint union of commutative strata. I am hoping to extend this to a more general case, perhaps to when G is solvable. A key step in the proof is to consider a faithful prime ideal P in kG, and an automorphism of G, trivial mod centre, that fixes P. By considering the Mahler expansion of the automorphism, and approximating the coefficients, we can examine sequences of bounded k-linear functions of kG, and study their convergence. If we find that they converge to an appropriate quantized divided power, we can find proper open subgroups of G that control P. I have extended this notion to larger classes of automorphisms, not necessarily trivial mod centre, using which this proof can be replicated, and in some cases extended to when G is abelian-by-procyclic. I will give some examples, for G with small rank, for which these ideas yield results.

A variety of groups is an equationally defined class of groups, namely the class of groups in which each of a set of "laws" (or "identical relations") holds. Examples include the abelian groups (defined by the law $xy = yx$), the groups of exponent dividing $d$ (defined by the law $x^d$), the nilpotent groups of class at most some fixed integer, and the solvable groups of derived length at most some fixed integer. This talk will give an introduction to varieties of groups, and then conclude with recent work on determining for certain varieties whether, for fixed coprime $m$ and $n$, a group $G$ is in the variety if and only if the power subgroups $G^m$ and $G^n$ (generated by the $m$-th and $n$-th powers) are in the variety.