Past Junior Algebra and Representation Theory Seminar

It is well-known that the set of irreducible (finite-dimensional) representations of a semisimiple complex Lie algebra g can be indexed by the dominant weights. The Borel-Weil theorem asserts that they can be seen geometrically as the global sections of line bundles over the flag variety. The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem computes the higher sheaf cohomology groups. There are several ways to prove the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem, which we will discuss. The classical idea is to study how the Casimir operator acts on the sheaf of sections of line bundles. Instead of this, the geometric idea is trying to compute the Doubeault cohomology, transferring the sheaf cohomology to the Lie algebra cohomology. The algebraic idea is to realize that the sheaf cohomology group can be computed by the derived functor of the induction, by using the Peter-Weyl the Borel-Weil theorem can be shown immediately.

Choose your favourite connected graph $\Delta$ and shade a subset $J$ of its vertices. The intersection arrangement associated to the data $(\Delta, J)$ is a collection of real hyperplanes in dimension $|Jc|$, first defined by Iyama and Wemyss. This construction involves taking the classical Coxeter arrangement coming from $\Delta$ and then setting all variables indexed by $J$ to be zero. It turns out that for many choices of $J$ the chambers of the intersection arrangement admit a nice combinatorial description, along with a wall crossing rule to pass between them. I will start by making all this precise before discussing my work to classify tilings of the hyperbolic plane arising as intersection arrangements. This has applications to local notions of stability conditions using the tilting theory of contracted preprojective algebras.

The Hecke category first rose to prominence through the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. Since then, the Hecke category has proven to be a fundamental object in representation theory with many interesting applications to modular representation theory, quantum groups, knot theory, categorification and diagrammatic algebra. This talk aims to give a gentle introduction to the Hecke category. We will first discuss the geometric incarnation of the Hecke category and how it was used to prove the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. Then, we move on to a more modern approach due to Soergel and Elias-Williamson which is purely algebraic, and we will discuss some recent advances in representation theory based on this approach.

Kashiwara’s theory of crystal bases provides a powerful tool for studying representations of quantum groups. Crystal bases retain much of the structural information of their corresponding representations, whilst being far more straightforward and ‘stripped-back’ objects (coloured digraphs). Their combinatorial description often enables us to obtain concrete realizations which shed light on the representations, and moreover turn challenging questions in representation theory into far more tractable problems.

After reviewing the construction and basic theory regarding quantum groups, I will introduce and motivate crystal bases as ‘nice q=0 bases’ for their representations. I shall then present (in both finite and affine types) the construction of Young wall models in the important case of highest weight representations. Time permitting, I will finish by discussing some applications across algebra and geometry.

In this talk I will discuss the representation theory of truncated current Lie algebras in prime characteristic. I will first give an introduction to modular representation theory for general restricted Lie algebras and introduce the Kac-Weisfeiler conjectures. Then I will introduce a family of Lie algebras known as truncated current Lie algebras, and discuss their representation theory and its relationship with the representation theory of reductive Lie algebras in positive characteristic.

The orbit method is a fundamental tool to study a finite dimensional solvable Lie algebra g. It relates the annihilators of simple U(g)-module to the coadjoint orbits of the adjoint group on g^* . In my talk, I will extend this story to the Witt algebra – a simple (non-solvable) infinite dimensional Lie algebra which is important in physics and representation theory. I will construct an induced module from an element of W^* and show that its annihilator is a primitive ideal. I will also construct an algebra homomorphism that allows one to relate the orbit method for W to that of a finite dimensional solvable algebra.

Associated to a complex admissible representation of a p-adic group is an invariant known is the "canonical dimension". It is closely related to the more well-studied invariant called the "wavefront set". The advantage of the canonical dimension over the wavefront set is that it allows for a completely different approach in computing it compared to the known computational methods for the wavefront set. In this talk we illustrate this point by finding a lower bound for the canonical dimension of any depth-zero supercuspidal representation, which depends only on the group and so is independent of the representation itself. To compute this lower bound, we consider the geometry of the associated Bruhat-Tits building.

The Junior Algebra and Representation Theory Seminar will kick-off the start of Trinity term with a social event in the common room. Come to catch up with your fellow students and maybe play a board game or two. Afterwards we'll have lunch together.

String topology is an umbrella under which lives a family of algebraic structures on the homology of the (compact-open) loop space of a closed smooth manifold, M. Of great interest are the string product and coproduct, in view of the failure of the latter to be a homotopy invariant. We will discuss some existing algebraic and geometric perspectives on these operations, and give some examples that probe the extent to which the string coproduct fails to be a homotopy invariant. We will sketch an alternative point of view on string topology as the study of the derived bornological smooth loop stack and explain why this is a promising model for the observed phenomena of string topology.

Questions in algebra, while deep and interesting, can be incredibly difficult. Thankfully, when studying the representation theory of the symmetric groups, one can often take algebraic properties and results and write them in the language of combinatorics; where one has a wide variety of tools and techniques to use. In this talk, we will look at the specific example of the submodule structure of 2-part Specht modules in characteristic 2, and answer which hook Specht modules are uniserial in characteristic 2. We will not need to assume the Riemann hypothesis for this talk.

Perverse equivalences, introduced by Chuang and Rouquier, are derived equivalences with a particularly nice combinatorial description. This generalised an earlier construction, with which they proved Broué’s abelian defect group conjecture for blocks of the symmetric groups. Perverse equivalences are of much wider significance in the representation theory of finite dimensional symmetric algebras. Grant has shown that periodic algebras admit perverse autoequivalences. In a similar vein, I will present some perverse equivalences arising from certain periodic modules, with an application to the setting of the symmetric groups.

In this possibly speculative talk I will try to outline a way to define analytic D-modules, using (higher) category theory and the ``six operations" on quasicoherent sheaves as the main tools. The aim is to follow the successful approach of Andy Jiang in the algebraic setting, who obtained such a theory without using stacks or formal schemes (as in Gaitsgory-Rozenblyum's approach). By using local cohomology, Jiang was able to avoid enlarging the category of algebras beyond the usual ones. We believe that an analytic variant of local cohomology can be used to recover the Ardakov-Wadsley theory of D-cap modules ``on the nose". (Work in progress).

The Monster group M is the largest sporadic simple group. It is also the group of automorphisms of 196, 884-dimensional Fischer-Norton-Griess algebra V_M. In 2009, A. A. Ivanov offered an axiomatic approach to studying the structure of V_M by introducing the notions of Majorana algebra and Majorana representation. Later, the theory developed, and Majorana representations of several groups were constructed. Our talk is dedicated to the existence of standard Majorana representations of 3-transposition groups for the Fischer list. The main result is that the groups from the Fischer list which admit a standard Majorana representation can be embedded into the Monster group.

Let K be a non-archimedean field of mixed characteristic (0,p), and let L be a finite extension of
the p-adic numbers contained in K. The speaker is interested in the continuous representations of a
given L-analytic group G in locally convex (usually infinite dimensional) topological vector spaces over K.
This is, up to technicalities, equivalent to studying certain topological modules over the locally
analytic distribution algebra D(G,K) of G. But doing algebra with topological objects is hard!
In this talk, we present an excellent remedy, found by Schneider and Teitelbaum in the early 2000s.

The Junior Algebra and Representation Theory Seminar will kick-off the start of Hilary term with a social event in the common room. Come to catch up with your fellow students and maybe play a board game or two. Afterwards we'll have lunch together.

Roughly speaking, class field theory for a number field K describes the abelianization of its absolute Galois group in terms of the idele class group of K. Geometric class field theory is what we get when K is instead the function field of a smooth projective geometrically connected curve X over a finite field. In this talk, I give a precise statement of geometric class field theory in the unramified case and describe how one can prove it by showing the Picard stack of X is the “free dualizable commutative group stack on X”. A key part is to show that the usual “divisor class group exact sequence“ can be done in families to give the adelic uniformization of the Picard stack by the moduli space of Cartier divisors on X. 

In the context of categorical Langlands, there are many ways in which one could define the notion of n-finitely presented smooth representation. We will explore and compare two different definitions, relating them with the notion of n-coherence for the corresponding Iwasawa ring.

The Hecke algebra is an algebraic gadget for studying the smooth complex representations of locally profinite groups. We demonstrate the spherical Hecke algebra of GL(n,F) is commutative and present a combinatorial proof of the Satake isomorphism. We apply this to the classification of spherical representations of GL(2,F).

The affine and periodic Temperley–Lieb algebras are families of infinite-dimensional algebras with a diagrammatic presentation. They have been studied in the last 30 years, mostly for their physical applications in statistical mechanics, where the diagrammatic presentation encodes the connectivity property of the models. Most of the relevant representations for physics are finite-dimensional. In this work, we define finite-dimensional quotients of these algebras, which we name uncoiled algebras in reference to the diagrammatic interpretation of the quotient, and construct a family of Wenzl–Jones idempotents, each of which projects onto one of the one-dimensional modules these algebras admit. We also prove that the uncoiled algebras are sandwich cellular and sketch some of the applications of the objects we defined. This is joint work with Alexi Morin-Duchesne.

Cluster algebras and their quantum counterparts were invented in the early 2000s in an attempt to construct elements of dual canonical bases. This turned out to be a harder goal than first realised. In this talk I will aim to give an introduction and overview of the theory and display the wide range of interesting maths which has gone into making steps in this area. I will try to assume as little possible prior knowledge and instead focus on interesting questions which remain open in this area.

Kaplansky's Zerodivisor Conjecture predicts that the group algebra kG is a domain, where k is a field and G is a torsion-free group. Though the general sentiment is that the conjecture is false, it still remains wide open after more than 70 years. In this talk we will survey known positive results surrounding the Zerodivisor Conjecture, with a focus on the technique of embedding group algebras into division rings. We will also present some new results in this direction, which are joint with Pablo Sánchez Peralta.

Typically, the algebraic closure of a non-algebraically closed field F is an infinite extension of F. However, this doesn't always have to happen: for example consider $\mathbb{R}$ inside $\mathbb{C}$. Are there any other examples? Yes: for example you can consider the index two subfield of the algebraic numbers, defined by intersecting with $\mathbb{R}$. However this is still similar to the first example: the degree of the extension is two, and we extract a square root of $-1$ to obtain the algebraic closure. The Artin-Schreier Theorem tells us that amazingly this is always the case: if $F$ is a field for which the algebraic closure is a non trivial finite extension $L$, then this forces F to have characteristic 0, L is degree two over $F$, and $L = F(i)$ for some $i$ with $i^2 = -1$. I.e. all such extensions "look like" $\mathbb{C} / \mathbb{R}$. In this expository talk we will give an overview of the proof of this theorem, and try to get some feeling for why this result is true.

We will kick off the start of the academic year and the Junior Algebra and Representation Theory seminar (JART) with a fun social event in the common room. Come catch up with your fellow students about what happened over the summer, meet the new students and play some board games. We'll go for lunch together afterwards.