Past Combinatorial Theory Seminar

Rado introduced the following `lion and man' game in the 1930's: two players (the lion and the man) are in the closed unit disc and they can run at the same speed. The lion would like to catch the man and the man would like to avoid being captured.

This game has a chequered history with several false `winning strategies' before Besicovitch finally gave a genuine winning strategy.

We ask the surprising question: can both players win?

A dot product representation of a graph assigns to each vertex $s$ a vector $v(s)$ in ${\bf R}^k$ in such a way that $v(s)^T v(t)$ is greater than $1$ if and only $st$ is an edge. Similarly, in a distance representation $|v(s)-v(t)|$ is less than $1$ if and only if $st$ is an edge.

I will discuss the solution of some open problems by Spinrad, Breu and Kirkpatrick and others on these and related geometric representations of graphs. The proofs make use of a connection to oriented pseudoline arrangements.

(Joint work with Colin McDiarmid and Ross Kang)

If $A$ is a set of $n$ positive integers, how small can the set

$\{ x/(x,y) : x,y \in A \}$ be? Here, as usual, $(x,y)$ denotes the highest common factor of

$x$ and $y$. This elegant question was raised by Granville and Roesler, who

also reformulated it in the following way: given a set $A$ of $n$ points in

the integer grid ${\bf Z}^d$, how small can $(A-A)^+$, the projection of the difference

set of $A$ onto the positive orthant, be?

Freiman and Lev gave an example to show that (in any dimension) the size can

be as small as $n^{2/3}$ (up to a constant factor). Granville and Roesler

proved that in two dimensions this bound is correct, i.e. that the size is

always at least $n^{2/3}$, and they asked if this holds in any dimension.

After some background material, the talk will focus on recent developments.

Joint work with B\'ela Bollob\'as.

In Achlioptas processes, starting from an empty graph, in each step two potential edges are chosen uniformly at random, and using some rule one of them is selected and added to the evolving graph. Although the evolution of such `local' modifications of the Erdös-Rényi random graph processes has received considerable attention during the last decade, so far only rather `simple' rules are well-understood. Indeed, the main focus has been on bounded size rules (where all component sizes larger than some constant B are treated the same way), and for more complex rules hardly any rigorous results are known. In this talk we will discuss a new approach that applies to many involved Achlioptas processes: it allows us to prove that certain key statistics are tightly concentrated during the early evolution of e.g. the sum and product rule.

Joint work with Oliver Riordan.

The phase transition deals with sudden global changes and is observed in many fundamental random discrete structures arising from statistical physics, mathematics and theoretical computer science, for example, Potts models, random graphs and random $k$-SAT. The phase transition in random graphs refers to the phenomenon that there is a critical edge density, to which adding a small amount results in a drastic change of the size and structure of the largest component. In the Erdős--R\'enyi random graph process, which begins with an empty graph on $n$ vertices and edges are added randomly one at a time to a graph, a phase transition takes place when the number of edges reaches $n/2$ and a giant component emerges. Since this seminal work of Erdős and R\'enyi, various random graph processes have been introduced and studied. In this talk we will discuss new approaches to study the size and structure of components near the critical point of random graph processes: key techniques are the classical ordinary differential equations method, a quasi-linear partial differential equation that tracks key statistics of the process, and singularity analysis.

We shall discuss how the algebra norm can be used to identify structure in groups. No prior familiarity with the area will be assumed.

We say that a hypergraph is \emph{stable} if each sufficiently large subset of its vertices either spans many hyperedges or is very structured. Hypergraphs that arise naturally in many classical settings posses the above property. For example, the famous stability theorem of Erdos and Simonovits and the triangle removal lemma of Ruzsa and Szemeredi imply that the hypergraph on the vertex set $E(K_n)$ whose hyperedges are the edge sets of all triangles in $K_n$ is stable. In the talk, we will present the following general theorem: If $(H_n)_n$ is a sequence of stable hypergraphs satisfying certain technical conditions, then a typical (i.e., uniform random) $m$-element independent set of $H_n$ is very structured, provided that $m$ is sufficiently large. The above abstract theorem has many interesting corollaries, some of which we will discuss. Among other things, it implies sharp bounds on the number of sum-free sets in a large class of finite Abelian groups and gives an alternate proof of Szemeredi’s theorem on arithmetic progressions in random subsets of integers.

Joint work with Noga Alon, Jozsef Balogh, and Robert Morris.

An embedding of a graph H in a graph G is an injective mapping of the vertices of H to the vertices of G such that edges of H are mapped to edges of G. Embedding problems have been extensively studied. A very powerful tool in this area is Szemeredi's Regularity Temma. It approximates the host graph G by a quasirandom graph which inherits many of the properties of G. Unfortunately the direct use of Szemeredi's Regularity Lemma is useless if the host graph G is sparse.

During the talk I shall expose a technique to deal with embedding trees in sparse graphs. This technique has been developed by Ajtai, Komlos,Simonovits and Szemeredi to solve the Erdos-Sos conjecture. Presently the author together with Hladky, Komlos, Simonovits, Stein and Szemeredi apply this method to solve the related conjecture of Loebl, Komlos and Sos (approximate version).

Hex was discovered independently by Piet Hein in Copenhagen in 1942 and byJohn Nash in Princeton in 1948.  The game is interesting because its rules are very simple, yet it is not known how to play best possible.  For example, a winning first move for the first player (who does have  a winning strategy) is still unknown. The talk will tell the history of the game and give simple proofs for basic results about it. Also the reverse game of HEX,sometimes called REX, will be discussed. New results about REX are under publication in Discrete Mathematics in a paper:  How to play Reverse Hex (joint work with Ryan Hayward and Phillip Henderson).

The induced graph removal lemma states that for any fixed graph $H$ on $h$ vertices and any $e\textgreater 0$ there exists $d\textgreater0$ such that any graph $G$ with at most $d n^h$ induced copies of $H$ may be made $H$-free by adding or removing atmost $e n^2$ edges. This fact was originally proven by Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich and Szegedy. In this talk, we discuss a new proof and itsrelation to various regularity lemmas. This is joint work with Jacob Fox.

It is known that generic and universal structures and Ramsey classes are related. We explain this connection and complement it by some new examples. Particularly we disscuss universal and Ramsey classes defined by existence and non-existence of homomorphisms.

The 2-dimensional assignment problem (minimum cost matching) is solvable in polynomial time, and it is known that a random instance of size n, with entries chosen independently and uniformly at random from [0,1], has expected cost tending to π^2/6.  In dimensions 3 and higher, the "planar" assignment problem is NP-complete, but what is the expected cost for a random instance, and how well can a heuristic do?  In d dimensions, the expected cost is of order at least n^{2-d} and at most ln n times larger, but the upper bound is non-constructive.  For 3 dimensions, we show a heuristic capable of producing a solution within a factor n^ε of the lower bound, for any constant ε, in time of order roughly n^{1/ε}.  In dimensions 4 and higher, the question is wide open: we don't know any reasonable average-case assignment heuristic.

We consider random walks on two classes of random graphs and explore the likely structure of the the set of unvisited vertices or vacant set. In both cases, the size of the vacant set $N(t)$ can be obtained explicitly as a function of $t$. Let $\Gamma(t)$ be the subgraph induced by the vacant set. We show that, for random graphs $G_{n,p}$ above the connectivity threshold, and for random regular graphs $G_r$, for constant $r\geq 3$, there is a phase transition in the sense of the well-known Erdos-Renyi phase transition. Thus for $t\leq (1-\epsilon)t^*$ we have a unique giant plus components of  size $O(\log n)$ and for $t\geq (1+\epsilon)t^*$ we have only components of  size $O(\log n)$.

In the case of $G_r$ we describe the likely degree sequence, size of the giant component and structure of the small ($O(\log n)$) size components.

A random planar graph $P_n$ is a graph drawn uniformly at random from the class of all (labelled) planar graphs on $n$ vertices. In this talk we show that with probability $1-o(1)$ the number of vertices of degree $k$ in $P_n$ is very close to a quantity $d_k n$ that we determine explicitly. Here $k=k(n) \le c \log n$. In the talk our main emphasis will be on the techniques for proving such results. (Joint work with Kosta Panagiotou.)

We highlight a technique for studying edge colourings of multigraphs, due to Tashkinov. This method is a sophisticated generalisation of the method of alternating paths, and builds upon earlier work by Kierstead and Goldberg. In particular we show how to apply it to a number of edge colouring problems, including the question of whether the class of multigraphs that attain equality in Vizing's classical bound can be characterised.

This talk represents joint work with Jessica McDonald.

In 1961 Hajos conjectured that if a graph contains no subdivsion of a clique of order t then its chromatic number is less than t. In 1981, Erdos and Fajtlowicz showed that the conjecture is almost always false. We show it is almost always true. This is joint work with Keevash, Mohar, and McDiarmid.

I shall describe some recent results about the asymptotic behaviour of matroids.

Specifically almost all matroids are simple and have probability at least 1/2 of being connected.

Also, various quantitative results about rank, number of bases and number and size of circuits of almost all matroids are given. There are many open problems and I shall not assume any previous knowledge of matroids. This is joint work, see below.

1 D. Mayhew, M. Newman, D. Welsh and G. Whittle,

On the asymptotic properties of connected matroids, European J. Combin. to appear

2 J. Oxley, C. Semple, L. Wasrshauer and D. Welsh,

On properties of almost all matroids, (2011) submitted

The $C_\ell$-free process starts with the empty graph on $n$ vertices and adds edges chosen uniformly at random, one at a time, subject to the condition that no copy of $C_\ell$ is created. For every $\ell \geq 4$ we show that, with high probability as $n \to \infty$, the maximum degree is $O((n \log n)^{1/(\ell-1)})$, which confirms a conjecture of Bohman and Keevash and improves on bounds of Osthus and Taraz. Combined with previous results this implies that the $C_\ell$-free process typically terminates with $\Theta(n^{\ell/(\ell-1)}(\log n)^{1/(\ell-1)})$ edges, which answers a question of Erd\H{o}s, Suen and Winkler. This is the first result that determines the final number of edges of the more general $H$-free process for a non-trivial \emph{class} of graphs $H$. We also verify a conjecture of Osthus and Taraz concerning the average degree, and obtain a new lower bound on the independence number. Our proof combines the differential equation method with a tool that might be of independent interest: we establish a rigorous way to `transfer' certain decreasing properties from the binomial random graph to the $H$-free process.

How many triangles must a graph of density d contain? This old question due to Erdos was recently answered by Razborov, after many decades of progress by numerous authors.

We will consider the analogous question for tripartite graphs. Given a tripartite graph with prescribed edges densities between each

pair of classes how many triangles must it contain?

A family of graphs F on a fixed set of n vertices is said to be triangle-intersecting if for any two graphs G,H in F, the intersection of G and H contains a triangle. Simonovits and Sos conjectured that such a family has size at most (1/8)2^{\binom{n}{2}}, and that equality holds only if F
consists of all graphs containing some fixed triangle. Recently, the author, Yuval Filmus and Ehud Friedgut proved a strengthening of this conjecture, namely that if F is an odd-cycle-intersecting family of graphs, then |F| \leq (1/8) 2^{\binom{n}{2}}. Equality holds only if F consists of all graphs containing some fixed triangle. A stability result also holds: an odd-cycle-intersecting family with size close to the maximum must be close to a family of the above form. We will outline proofs of these results, which use Fourier analysis, together with an analysis of the properties of random cuts in graphs, and some results in the theory of Boolean functions. We will then discuss some related open questions.

All will be based on joint work with Yuval Filmus (University of Toronto) and Ehud Friedgut (Hebrew University of Jerusalem).